Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2015 Ford F250 Xl on 2040-cars

US $37,986.00
Year:2015 Mileage:0 Color: Tuxedo Black Metallic /
 Steel
Location:

14897 MO-38, Marshfield, Missouri, United States

14897 MO-38, Marshfield, Missouri, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:6.2L V8 16V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FT7X2B62FEA10936
Stock Num: 22337
Make: Ford
Model: F250 XL
Year: 2015
Exterior Color: Tuxedo Black Metallic
Interior Color: Steel
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Braking Assist
  • Cancellable Passenger Airbag
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Engine immobilizer
  • External temperature display
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 40.7"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.6"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.1"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 35.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 10,000 lbs.
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 6.9 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 40 cu.ft.
  • Non-independent front suspension classification
  • Other front suspension
  • Overall Width: 79.9"
  • Overhead console: Full with storage
  • Power steering
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 38.1"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.3"
  • Rear Leg Room: 31.6"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.1"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Trailer hitch
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors

Auto Services in Missouri

West County Auto Body Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1650 N Lindbergh Blvd, Maryland-Heights
Phone: (314) 993-4466

Villars Automotive Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Towing
Address: 613 N Walnut Ave, Billings
Phone: (417) 732-1545

Tuff Toy Sales ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 14316 Highway 14 W, Powersite
Phone: (417) 889-2886

T & K Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 28867 Old Hwy 65, Warsaw
Phone: (660) 438-3509

Stock`s Underhood Specialist ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 321 Centreville Ave, Saint-Louis
Phone: (618) 233-6119

Schorr`s Transmission, Auto & Truck Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment-Service & Repair, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment
Address: 1901 South M-291 Hwy, Independence
Phone: (816) 974-4261

Auto blog

The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different

Fri, May 8 2020

The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.

NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"

Hot sales have Detroit automakers shortening summer shutdowns

Tue, 08 Jul 2014

Back in May, there was speculation that the Detroit Three automakers would maintain or perhaps even extend their traditional summer shutdowns, mostly due to a bitingly cold winter that saw below-freezing temperatures infiltrate the southernmost reaches of the US, putting a chill on auto sales. Now, though, the numbers are in, and thanks to some promising sales figures, it looks like some domestic line workers are going to be working clear through July, in some cases.
According to Automotive News, Ford has slashed its traditional two-week hiatus for factory workers in half at four of its plants, while both Chrysler and General Motors will keep factories running nonstop (two plants in Chrysler's case and a third of GM's factories).
This is, as we said, thanks to some positive numbers. Chief among those is the Seasonal Adjusted Annual Rate, which was at an eight-year high of 17 million units. Individual figures were less promising. GM, embroiled in its recall scandal, still saw a one-percent increase while Ford dropped six percent in year-over-year sales. Chrysler was the big winner, though, with a nine-percent jump in June.