Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2008 Ford Escape Xls on 2040-cars

US $9,900.00
Year:2008 Mileage:94327 Color: Light Sage Metallic /
 Stone
Location:

4565 Dixie Hwy, Fairfield, Ohio, United States

4565 Dixie Hwy, Fairfield, Ohio, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:2.3L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FMCU02Z38KB33599
Stock Num: PB33599
Make: Ford
Model: Escape XLS
Year: 2008
Exterior Color: Light Sage Metallic
Interior Color: Stone
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • AM/FM/Satellite-capable Radio
  • Braking Assist
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Chrome grille
  • Clock: In-dash
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Dual vanity mirrors
  • Flip forward cushion/seatback rear seats
  • Four-wheel Independent Suspension
  • Front Head Room: 40.4"
  • Front Hip Room: 53.3"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.6"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 56.6"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 16.5 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Independent rear suspension
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Max cargo capacity: 66 cu.ft.
  • Metal-look center console trim
  • MP3 player
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • Overall height: 67.7"
  • Overall Length: 174.7"
  • Overall Width: 71.1"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Plastic/vinyl steering wheel trim
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Radio Data System
  • Rear Head Room: 39.2"
  • Rear Hip Room: 49.1"
  • Rear Leg Room: 35.6"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 55.9"
  • Rear window remote window operation
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Remote power door locks
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Fro
  • Side airbag
  • Silver styled steel rims
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Wheel Diameter: 16
  • Wheel Width: 6.5
  • Wheelbase: 103.1"
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 94327

Auto Services in Ohio

Westside Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 5568 Glenway Ave, Westwood
Phone: (513) 922-0534

Van`s Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 185 Broad St, Wadsworth
Phone: (330) 336-6630

Used 2 B New ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 4620 Navarre Rd SW, Hartville
Phone: (330) 479-7291

T D Performance ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 1218 Omniplex Dr, Monroe
Phone: (513) 671-4100

T & J`s Auto Body & Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 13919 Old McArthur Rd, Union-Furnace
Phone: (740) 385-2179

Skipco Financial ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Automobile Auctions
Address: 700 Elm Ridge Ave, Sterling
Phone: (330) 854-4900

Auto blog

Would a Mustang-based Lincoln look like this?

Mon, 07 Jan 2013

Designer Josiah LaCalla has taken a stab at what a Ford Mustang-based Lincoln model might look like with the Continental Mark X1 concept. Make no mistake, Ford's luxury arm has made it abundantly clear that it won't be pursuing any new products outside of volume models, which means a flashy halo grand tourer like the one you see here isn't in the cards. LaColla used the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG as a basis for his creation, which explains the long nose, but we certainly don't mind the idea of a rear-wheel drive Lincoln with a cabin pushed to the aft.
While we're dreaming, there's certainly nothing stopping us from imagining what's under that lengthy hood. We like the idea of the 5.8-liter supercharged V8 from the Shelby GT500 pushing the Mark X1 down the road, but how about something a little more inventive? Something like a high-revving, buttery V12 with enough torque to push the contraption well past 200 miles per hour. Dream a little dream, people.

Why the Detroit Three should merge their engine operations

Tue, Dec 22 2015

GM and FCA should consider a smaller merger that could still save them billions of dollars, and maybe lure Ford into the deal. Fiat-Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne would love to see his company merge with General Motors. But GM's board of directors essentially told him to go pound sand. So now what? The boardroom battle started when Mr. Marchionne published a study called Confessions of a Capital Junkie. In it, Sergio detailed the amount of capital the auto industry wastes every year with duplicate investments. And he documented how other industries provide superior returns. He's right, of course. Other industries earn much better returns on their invested capital. And there's a danger that one day the investors will turn their backs on the auto industry and look to other business sectors where they can make more money. But even with powerful arguments Marchionne couldn't convince GM to take over FCA. And while that fight may now be over, GM and FCA should consider a smaller merger that could still save them billions of dollars, and maybe lure Ford into the deal. No doubt this suggestion will send purists into convulsions, but so be it. The Detroit Three should seriously consider merging their powertrain operations, even though that's a sacrilege in an industry that still considers the engine the "heart" of the car. These automakers have built up considerable brand equity in some of their engines. But the vast majority of American car buyers could not tell you what kind of engine they have under the hood. More importantly, most car buyers really don't care what kind of engine or transmission they have as long as it's reliable, durable, and efficient. Combining that production would give the Detroit Three the kind of scale that no one else could match. There are exceptions, of course. Hardcore enthusiasts care deeply about the powertrains in their cars. So do most diesel, plug-in, and hybrid owners. But all of them account for maybe 15 percent of the car-buying public. So that means about 85 percent of car buyers don't care where their engine and transmission came from, just as they don't know or care who supplied the steel, who made the headlamps, or who delivered the seats on a just-in-time basis. It's immaterial to them. And that presents the automakers with an opportunity to achieve a staggering level of manufacturing scale. In the NAFTA market alone, GM, Ford, and FCA will build nearly nine million engines and nine million transmissions this year.

2020 Toyota Highlander vs other 3-row crossovers: There can only be one!

Fri, Dec 20 2019

We've done quite a few spec comparison posts involving three-row family crossovers, and when included, the Toyota Highlander has always been the runt of the group. While the rest increasingly seemed to be benchmarking each other toward greater girth, the Highlander was the outlier.  That changes a bit for the 2020 Toyota Highlander, but only a bit. It's now larger and more competitive, specifically in regards to the amount of cargo space aft of the third-row seat. As you can see below, this aligns the Highlander most closely to its long-time competitor the 2020 Honda Pilot. However, let's see how it stacks up to others in the segment, which is heavily populated now, so for the sake of space, we've selected the newest entries: Kia Telluride, Hyundai Palisade, Subaru Ascent and Ford Explorer. The order in which they are presented is random.  Performance and fuel economy The 2020 Highlander is more than 200 pounds lighter than its predecessor, but has the same 295-horsepower V6 engine that was already one of the strongest in the segment. We'd say that would give it a leg up, but the Pilot and Explorer have proven to be sprinters, delivering 0-60 times in the low-6 range by some publications' stopwatches (or VBoxes, whatever). We don't expect the Highlander to beat them, but it may dip into the 6's. The heavy, less-powerful Subaru Ascent is most likely to take up the rear. It's fuel economy of 23 mpg combined also matches the Highlander and Explorer for segment-best. Remember, however, that the Explorer's turbocharged inline-four engine is likely more susceptible to differences in driving style (read: a heavy foot).  Of course, if you're really interested in fuel economy, the Highlander and Explorer are the only vehicles in the segment to offer hybrid versions. The Ford Explorer Hybrid puts a greater emphasis on performance, however, resulting in lower estimates of 25 mpg combined (AWD) and 28 mpg combined (FWD). By contrast, the new 2020 Toyota Highlander Hybrid is estimated to return 36 mpg combined.  Passenger and cargo space According to Highlander chief engineer Yoshikazu Saeki, he had a choice of two directions with the new Highlander. He could have indeed made it bigger, matching these very competitors, especially in terms of third-row and cargo space. Or, he could have maintained a smaller-than-average size. He obviously chose the latter. First, it was the size customers had come to expect. Would they be put off by something bigger?