1998 FORD E350 HEAVY DUTY VAN. THE PROBLEM WITH HER IS THE HEADS . THE SPARK PLUG THREADS ARE SHOT AND PLUG #3 IS NO LONGER THERE. IT NEEDS 4 TIRES AND A LEFT FRONT TIE-ROD TO WHICH I HAVE. THE MOTOR ITSELF IS VERY STRONG IT IS THE ORIGINAL BIG BLOCK 5.4L. IT HAS NEVER BLOWN ANY SMOKE OR BURNED OIL. THE BODY IS IN GOOD SHAPE NOT ROTTED OUT. THE DRIVER SIDE PANEL DOES HAVE A MINOR CREASE IN IT. THE FLOOR BOARDS ARE GREAT VERY LITTLE RUST. FRAME IS SOLID. DASH BOARD IS IN GOOD SHAPE THE RIGHT VENT HAS A BROKEN FLAP. THE NOSE ON HER IS CLEANED. WINDSHIELD WAS PUT IN IN 2013. THE REAR BRAKES ARE GOOD. I JUST PUT NEW ROTOR'S, PADS, CALIPERS, AND SEAL'S ON HER IN LATE 2013. THE DRIVER SIDE SEAT IS TORN PASSENGER IS GOOD. RADIATOR IS 5 YEARS OLD INSTALLED IN 2008 IT IS A 1 CORE. THE ROOF IS BUCKLED IN BECAUSE THE GARAGE OPENING IS TOO SMALL. IT CAN BE EASILY POPPED OUT. DOES NOT LEAK. IT DOES START BUT NOT ADVISED TOO WITH THE #3 PLUG MISSING. IT HAS A CLEAR TITLE EXHAUST IS SOLID. DOES HAVE CD/CASSETTE PLAYER IT CUTS OUT EVERY NOW AND THEN. LOOSE WIRE PROBABLY. HAS CRUISE CONTROL AND TILT COLUMN. ANY QUESTIONS GUY'S EMAIL ME.
|
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
No reserve 2003 ford e350 kuv service utility van arizona clean & well maint!!!
2011 econoline-e250 extended w/racks-26150 miles
No reserve 1999 ford e250 cargo van under 115k miles!!!
Turbo diesel ! just serviced ! warranty ! extended cargo van ! no reserve !06
2004 ford e250 econoline extended van w/rear electric lift(US $4,500.00)
Ford van e150 2011 48492 miles dealer serviced - white
Auto blog
This Ford F-150 might have a Land Rover turbodiesel V6
Thu, Dec 17 2015Our spy photographers just caught this Ford F-150 driving around Dearborn, wearing camouflage around the bed – not so unusual near Ford's headquarters. What's interesting with this particular mule is that it might be packing a Jaguar-Land Rover turbodiesel V6. As with the Super Duty, the F-150 prototype pictured here sports a Venturi exhaust tip popping out the side of the rear bumper behind the wheel, which – along with the sound reported by our shutterbug – suggests that it's burning oil up front. That could mean Ford has found another application for the 3.2-liter, five-cylinder Power Stroke diesel that it just federalized for the Transit van. However our sources suggest what the mule is actually powered by the 3.0-liter Lion V6 diesel that Jaguar Land Rover – once subsidiaries in Ford's Premier Automotive Group – is bringing over for the Td6 models of the Range Rover and Range Rover Sport. The engine produces a respectable 254 horsepower and a healthy 443 pound-feet of torque, and is tipped to be mated to the same ten-speed automatic transmission as the new Raptor. That could give the F-150 the kind of fuel economy and muscle it would need to challenge the likes of the Ram 1500 EcoDiesel and the heavier-duty Nissan Titan with the Cummins engine. With gas prices as low as they are, however, and sales of diesel-powered vehicles lagging, Ford could just be trying to keep up with the competition by offering a light-duty diesel pickup. With its lightweight aluminum body, the diesel F-150 could even surpass the Duramax diesel-powered Chevy Colorado and GMC Canyon for frugality at the pumps, according to Mark Williams of PickupTrucks.com. He told Autoblog that, "it makes perfect sense for Ford to do a diesel. It seems like everyone is pushing them to do a Ranger, but if they can get the F-150 to push 30 mpg it can challenge the Ram Ecodiesel and even the Colorado Duramax." Reached for comment, Ford spokesman Mike Levine sent us the following statement: "We do not speculate about future products. While diesel is a solution, it is not the solution. EcoBoost offers the ideal combination of performance and fuel economy that over 60 percent of F-150 customers are choosing." Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-150 Diesel: Spy Shots Image Credit: Brian Williams / SpiedBilde Green Spy Photos Ford Land Rover Truck Diesel Vehicles jaguar land rover ford f-150 diesel
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.
Ford reports 58% drop in Q2 profits on European losses
Wed, 25 Jul 2012
Ford Motor Company announced Wednesday that it has posted a $1 billion profit for the second quarter of 2012. That sounds like good news for the Blue Oval, until you take into account that Ford posted a $2.4 billion profit for Q2 a year ago. That is a substantial 58 percent loss.
Ford also posted $465 million in international losses, with $404 million of those losses coming directly from Europe. The automaker also increased its European loss projections to $1 billion for 2012, due in large part to the economic crisis overseas, which has resulted in increased unemployment and decreased consumer confidence.