1996 Ford Aerostar Passenger Van (7) 3.0l on 2040-cars
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Engine:3.0L 182Cu. In. V6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Mini Passenger Van
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Exterior Color: Red
Make: Ford
Interior Color: Gray
Model: Aerostar
Trim: XLT Sport Mini Passenger Van 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Options: CD Player, HANDSFREE BLUETOOTH BUILT IN MIC
Number of Cylinders: 6
Safety Features: Driver Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 167,000
Ford Aerostar 1996 
Automatic 3.0 liter
Rear wheel drive
Aprox. 167,xxx miles - 7 passengers (2:2:3) rear seats removable or "switchable" to a flat floor.
2nd owner from new: Well kept - Engine & transmission runs great - reliable, Private owner, Daily driver. Interior in nice condition, no seat rips or tears - good support - very comfortable - Extremely safe vehicle to drive. Excellent vision of road - Either or both rear seat benches are removable for extra room or a flat floor. Great for passenger, work ( 4 new shocks) or shopping at Ikea. PS/PB/ PW / Automatic / Sliding side door & lift rear door. Front & rear bumpers in very good condition. Bought 3 years ago from Original owner Florida car. Power windows all work. A/C needs to be flushed & replace the compressor. Has some clearcoat peeling but body is a decent condition. Any interest or questions email ; call or text...
Below is work I've done since June 2011.
My maintenence records with receipts:
New spark plugs and wires set , new thermostat & gasket; fan clutch; fan blades; and heater hose ( 7/22/11) $665.55
New belt tensioner; radiator ; coolant & flushed transmission & fill (6/20/11) $472.09
New radiator & cap ( 6/28/11) $407.26
Ac evaporator - 134a freon - oil change ; evacuate ; charge leak test (3/1/12) $229.76 & new compressor $499.79
Ford Dealership installed new front passenger door striker ; new sliding door weatherstrip, striker , rail and lubrication,
replaced washed hose for windows, (3/15/12 ) $606.21 ( parts & labor )
New front shocks ; dust cap; wheel bearing washers ; rear brake shoes; packed wheel bearings ( 11/8/12) $396.15
New right front tie rod end (11/24/12) $171.05
New front rotors ; New front shocks ; added gear oil in differential ( 2/7/13 ) $385.20
15" wheels from 2000 Mustang ( matching bore holes ) . ($200.)
New front windshield with Ford OEM (2/7/13 ) $200.
New front wipers ( $30 )
Installed new wireless Bluetooth head unit & front dash infinity speakers (3/2/13) $95 & parts $200.
Ford Aerostar for Sale
1992 ford aerostar  mini passenger van 2-door 3.0l
1929 ford 5 window coupe only 575 miles pearl paint with ram jet on 350 ci auto!
1988 ford aerostar base cargo van
1991 ford aerostar cargo van
1994 ford aerostar xlt electronic   4 wheel drive   4wd   awd   * low mileage *
1994 ford areostar xl - 58k miles - 5 passenger - 3.0l
Auto Services in Florida
Zip Automotive ★★★★★
X-Lent Auto Body, Inc. ★★★★★
Wilde Jaguar of Sarasota ★★★★★
Wheeler Power Products ★★★★★
Westland Motors R C P Inc ★★★★★
West Coast Collision Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe
Mon, 17 Dec 2012According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"
Ford using robot drivers to test durability [w/video]
Sun, 16 Jun 2013In testing the durability of its upcoming fullsize Transit vans, Ford has begun using autonomous robotic technology to pilot vehicles through the punishing courses of its Michigan Proving Grounds test facility. The autonomous tech allows Ford to run more durability tests in a single day than it could with human drivers, as well as create even more challenging tests that wouldn't be safe to run with a human behind the wheel.
The technology being used was developed by Utah-based Autonomous Solutions, and isn't quite like the totally autonomous vehicles being developed by companies like Google and Audi for use out in the real world. Rather, Ford's autonomous test vehicles follow a pre-programmed course and their position is tracked via GPS and cameras that are being monitored from a central control room. Though the route is predetermined, the robotic control module operates the steering, acceleration and braking to keep the vehicle on course as it drives over broken concrete, cobblestones, metal grates, rough gravel, mud pits and oversize speed bumps.
Scroll down to watch the robotic drivers in action, though be warned that you're headed for disappointment if you expect to see a Centurion behind the wheel (nerd alert!). The setup looks more like a Mythbusters experiment than a scene from Battlestar Galactica.
Defying Trump, major automakers finalize California emissions deal
Tue, Aug 18 2020WASHINGTON — The California Air Resources Board (CARB) and major automakers on Monday confirmed they had finalized binding agreements to cut vehicle emissions in the state, defying the Trump administration's push for weaker curbs on tailpipe pollution. The agreements with carmakers Ford Motor Co, Volkswagen AG, Honda Motor Co and BMW AG were first announced in July 2019 as voluntary measures prompting anger from U.S. President Donald Trump. A month later, the Justice Department opened an antitrust probe into the agreements. The government ended the investigation without action. The Trump administration in March finalized a rollback of U.S. vehicle emissions standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026. That is far weaker than the 5% annual increases in the discarded rules adopted under President Barack Obama. The 50-page California agreements, which extend through 2026, are less onerous than the standards finalized by the Obama administration but tougher than the Trump administration standards. The automakers have also agreed to electric vehicle commitments. Volvo Cars, owned by China's Geely Holdings, said in March it planned to join the automakers agreeing to the California requirements. It has also finalized its agreement. The settlement agreements say California and automakers agreed to resolve "potential legal disputes concerning the authority of CARB" and other states that have adopted California's standards. In May, a group of 23 U.S. states led by California and some major cities, challenged the Trump vehicle emissions rule. Other major automakers like General Motors Co, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and Toyota Motor Corp did not join the California agreement. Those companies also sided with the Trump administration in a separate lawsuit over whether the federal government can strip California of the right to set zero emission vehicle requirements. Ford said the "final agreement will reduce emissions in our vehicles at a more stringent rate, support and incentivize the production of electrified products, and create regulatory certainty." BMW said "by setting these long-term, predictable, and achievable standards, we have the regulatory certainty that is necessary for long-term planning that will not only reduce greenhouse gas emissions but ultimately benefit consumers as well."Â

										

