Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1966 Dodge Charger Base Hardtop 2-door Poly 318 Air Conditioning Automatic on 2040-cars

US $12,850.00
Year:1966 Mileage:100000 Color: with nice Dark Blue interior
Location:

Hugo, Minnesota, United States

Hugo, Minnesota, United States
Advertising:

We are selling this 1966 Dodge Charger for a customer of ours. This 66 Charger has not been driven much in the past 5 years. It has a nice looking powder Blue exterior with nice Dark Blue interior. The drivers side bucket does have some usual wear ( See Pic ) also the dash looks very nice as do all the other panels. The out side has had a repaint due to thin paint and looks very nice. As you can tell by the pics the inner trunk extensions. floor boards, trunk floor and torsion bar crossmember are all really solid. The engine needs a tune up and it will be done by end of auction. Other than that it runs, drives and stops fine! We always get the question…Will this car make it to Sandusky Ohio or Salt lake city Utah? Well this is a nice driving car but it has been driven very little in last 5 to 6 years. So to answer the question…I would recommend trailering the car to your destination until you are comfortable with driving it coast to coast. This is a factory Air conditioned car that still blows semi cold air! The Tachometer works and speedometer works. I think the temp gauge does not. Car has bumper guards. has dual exhaust that is quiet. This is a mostly stock car that would make a very nice cruiser! Take a look at the pics…this is a solid car! If I forgot anything please ask or call Randy @ SharaDon Performance in Hugo MN 651-426-0061

Auto Services in Minnesota

Zimmerman Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Racing & Sports Cars
Address: 26069 2nd St W, Burns-Township
Phone: (763) 856-5949

South Central Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 510 17th St N, Courtland
Phone: (507) 354-3540

Sleepy Eye Auto Salvage ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 20917 State Highway 4, Sleepy-Eye
Phone: (507) 794-6673

Sears Auto Center ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube, Tire Dealers
Address: 425 Rice St, Vadnais-Heights
Phone: (651) 291-4327

Saigon Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3028 E Lake St, Saint-Louis-Park
Phone: (612) 721-7087

Rose Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1695 Fernwood St, Saint-Anthony
Phone: (651) 383-4532

Auto blog

1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express in Generation Gap showdown with 1933 Ford Pickup

Fri, 18 Jul 2014

Auto enthusiasts love a good debate, whether it's Mustang versus Camaro or Ferrari against Lamborghini. But how about a battle between two very different vintages of classic pickup trucks? In this case, the fight is between a 1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express and a 1933 Ford Model 46 truck with a flathead V8.
The shootout comes courtesy of the internet series Generation Gap, and its concept is super-simple. One guy prefers classics, and the other likes newer rides. They choose a category, pick two vehicles and put them head to head. In this case, neither is exactly modern, though. The Ford is more than old enough to receive Social Security checks, and the Dodge is hardly a young whippersnapper.
Other than both being pickups, these two models were made to serve very different functions. The Li'l Red Express was basically the progenitor of today's muscle trucks, with a big V8 that made it one of the quickest new models in its day (admittedly, 1979 was a rough time for automotive performance). On the other hand, the '33 Ford was just meant to work, with little pretense for anything else. One of the hosts describes it as "the simplest, most difficult" vehicle he's driven because of the tricky double clutchwork necessary to shift gears. Scroll down to watch the video and try to decide which of these two American classics you would rather have in your garage.

Camaro driver clocked at 171 miles per hour

Wed, Apr 13 2016

Chevy's 2016 Camaro SS is a fantastic piece of automotive engineering. It is also, apparently, very, very fast. This latter fact was perfectly illustrated when, on April 8, a Camaro SS driver was nailed in Two Harbors, Minnesota for doing 171 mph. According to WFAA, the unnamed speed demon was flying down Highway 61 near Two Harbors when Hermantown, MN Deputy Police Chief Shawn Padden clocked him at an eye-watering 171 mph. He then recorded the speeder at 168 and 141. At the time, Deputy Chief Padden was working with Minnesota State Patrol on an anti-DWI program called "Toward Zero Deaths". Padden, who was interviewed by the Duluth News Tribune, said he was surprised at the driver's sheer speed. "When he went by me, it was a blur," Padden told the News. "You get used to seeing people going 65 or 70 and what that looks like. But I've never seen anything like this. It's like a rocket on wheels." Fadden chased the Camaro down eventually, but it took some doing. To catch the Camaro, he pushed his Dodge Charger Pursuit to 135 mph just to get into range so the Camaro could see his emergency lights. The speeding driver was ticketed for careless driving, but may lose his license due to a Minnesota law that gives courts the option of revoking licenses for drivers caught doing more than 100 mph. News Source: WFAA, Duluth News Tribune Weird Car News Chevrolet Dodge Driving Safety Coupe Police/Emergency Performance Sedan camaro ss camaro

FCA and Cummins named in diesel emissions class-action lawsuit

Mon, Nov 14 2016

Chrysler is now the first United States-based carmaker to be sued for allegedly skewing emissions results. In a move that sounds eerily similar to the troubles of European manufacturers, Chrysler is claimed to have hid diesel engine characteristics causing emissions as much as 14 times higher than permitted by regulations. According to Bloomberg, the lawsuit alleges that Chrysler, together with its diesel engine partner Cummins, has concealed the nitrogen oxide output of certain Ram vehicles produced between 2007 and 2012. The NOx pollutants were meant to be broken down in a process called regeneration in the truck's NAC system, or NOx Absorption Catalyst, which predated the 2013-introduced SCR, or Selective Catalytic Reduction system. By design, the NAC captures and stores NOx emissions, converting them to nitrogen and oxygen through a catalytic process. The lawsuit claims the Cummins engine's system has a limited capacity to store the emissions, and as a result the pollutants escape, increasing emissions, worsening fuel consumption and wearing down the catalytic converter. The later, cleaner SCR system uses a urea-water injection, and it gradually replaced the NAC on Cummins 6.7-liter engines, as it was first implemented in 2011 and made standard in 2013. As Bloomberg notes, the model years of Ram trucks involved in the lawsuit predate the earliest Volkswagen "Dieselgate" models by two years. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of 500,000 truck owners, accuses Chrysler and Cummins of fraud, false advertising and racketeering. As an underlying motive, the filing mentions a 2001 change in EPA emissions standards. Announced to become effective in 2010, the EPA requirements drove Chrysler and Cummins to try and reach those already by 2007. However, the NAC system is said to have fallen short of these goals, and the filing claims that Chrysler and Cummins chose to "rig" the engines instead. The affected vehicles predate the 2014 merger of Chrysler and Fiat. FCA US has released a statement regarding the lawsuit, saying it will contest the lawsuit "vigorously". News Source: BloombergImage Credit: Getty Editorial Government/Legal Green Chrysler Dodge RAM Emissions Diesel Vehicles FCA cummins diesel