1999 Dodge Intrepid Es 1 Owner Low Miles, Leather, Excellent Condition Below Kbb on 2040-cars
Lincoln Park, New Jersey, United States
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.2L 3200CC 197Cu. In. V6 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Dodge
Model: Intrepid
Trim: ES Sedan 4-Door
Options: Cassette Player, Leather Seats, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: FWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 74,949
Sub Model: ES FULLY LOADED LOW MILEAGE PRICED TO SELL 1 OWNER
Exterior Color: Tan
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Tan
Number of Doors: 4
Number of Cylinders: 6
SELLING OUR 1999 DODGE INTREPID ES (FULLY LOADED) WITH ONLY 74,949 MILES! RUNS AND DRIVES PERFECT!
ES MODEL HAS A POWERFUL 3.2L V6 ENGINE (225 HORSEPOWER), AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION, AND GETS 19 CTY/29 HWY MPG.
HAS FOG LIGHTS AND 16-INCH ALUMINUM WHEELS; THE ES MODEL HAS LOW SPEED TRACTION CONTROL TO REDUCE SLIPPING.
TAN/BEIGE EXTERIOR (PAINT IS IN EXCELLENT CONDITION) WITH MATCHING TAN/BEIGE LEATHER INTERIOR.
ONLY 1 OWNER AND WELL MAINTAINED WITH ALL SERVICE UP TO DATE.
HAS TWO NEW TIRES AND ORIGINAL NEW FULL SIZE SPARE TIRE!
NEW BRAKES INSTALLED DECEMBER 2012.
GREAT CONDITION OVERALL AND HAS LEATHER, INFINITY SOUND SYSTEM.
NO ACCIDENTS / CLEAN CARFAX (SEE CLEAN AUTOCHECK REPORT). INSPECTION GOOD UNTIL 2015.
COMES WITH 2 KEYS AND ALL ORIGINAL PAPERWORK / DOCUMENTATION.
PRICED TO SELL AS WE HAVE 4 OTHER CARS. BELOW KBB VALUE ($3,900).
FEEL FREE TO CALL / TEXT / EMAIL WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
IF YOU WANT TO SEE MORE PICTURES OR THE ACTUAL CAR PLEASE EMAIL ME. OR CALL 862.222.4312.
THANK YOU.
SPECIFICATIONS
MODEL: Dodge Intrepid ES
ENGINE: 3.2-liter SOHC V-6
HORSEPOWER/TORQUE: 225 hp @6300 rpm/225 lb-ft @3800 rpm
TRANSMISSION: Four-speed automatic with AutoStick
FUEL ECONOMY: 19 mpg city, 29 mpg highway, 22.1 mpg test
WHEELBASE: 113.0 in.
LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT: 203.7 x 74.7 x 55.9 in.
CURB WEIGHT: 3519 lbs.
FUEL CAPACITY: 17.0 gal.
LUGGAGE CAPACITY: 18.4 cu. ft.
TIRES: P225/60R16
INSTRUMENTS: Speedometer, tachometer, fuel gauge,
water temperature, digital clock.
EQUIPMENT: Power windows, power door locks,
power mirrors, power seats, heated seats,
cruise control, air conditioner,
AM-FM stereo radio with in-dash cassette
player and in-dash CD player,
anti-lock four-wheel disc brakes,
dual front air bags.
STICKER PRICE: $23,500
Dodge Intrepid for Sale
2001 dodge intrepid se sedan 4-door 2.7l(US $1,500.00)
Dodge intrepid. large four-door, full-size, front-wheel drive sedan. 3.3l v6(US $900.00)
Dodge intrepid es
2004 dodge intrepid, no reserve
2002 dodge intrepid se sedan 4-door 2.7l(US $1,500.00)
2000 dodge intrepid es sedan 4-door 3.2l low mileage = 60,250 & one owner!!!!(US $5,990.00)
Auto Services in New Jersey
Yonkers Honda Corp ★★★★★
White Dotte ★★★★★
Vicari Motors Inc ★★★★★
Tronix Ii ★★★★★
Tire Connection & More ★★★★★
Three Star Auto Service Inc. ★★★★★
Auto blog
Hypermiling a Ram 1500 EcoDiesel to 38.1 mpg
Fri, May 9 2014You never quite know what Wayne Gerdes has up his sleeve. The man who coined the term hypermiling is always looking for adventurous ways to prove that anyone – even you... yes, you – can eke out more miles per gallon just by changing the way you drive. Saying that is easy. Proving it by going on outlandish cross-country drives is hard. But for Gerdes and his team of fuel economy fiends over at CleanMPG, hard is half the fun. Our latest adventure appeared, at first glance, to be nearly impossible. Which is why we always answer the phone when Gerdes calls. He likes to take journalists along on his drives, not only to try teach us how to hypermile but also to prove that we can be taught. The first time I 'helped' him and his team was when we got over 30 miles per gallon in a 2011 Ford F-150 XLT with the EcoBoost 3.5-liter V6. The EPA rated that truck with at just 16 mpg in the city and 22 on the highway. So, we'll count that trip as a success. Next up was a cross-country drive last fall in a trio of Audi TDI vehicles to prove that you don't need to drive extra slow to beat the EPA numbers. In fact, we made it from Los Angeles to New York City in just over 46 hours, cramped but not cranky. We had once again proven that how you drive is hugely important to your fuel usage. Our latest adventure appeared, at first glance, to be nearly impossible. The EPA says that the Ram 1500 EcoDiesel we would be driving gets just 22 combined mpg (19 city and 27 highway). Gerdes' idea was to drive it as far north from Houston, TX towards Detroit, MI as we could go on one tank. The day before we left, our itinerary got an extra stop. Instead of taking one of the official Shell Eco-marathon prototype vehicles to Detroit, it was decided to bring the winning diesel-powered prototype from the just-finished event to The Henry Ford Museum, where it had been arranged the car would be displayed. The winning car was built by a small team (just four students) from Sullivan High School in Sullivan, IN, who managed to beat a number of college teams with a score of 1,899.32 mpg. That target would be a bit out of reach for the Ram, but could we get 1,000 miles from the tank? Since the truck has a 26 gallon tank (officially, anyway), that would mean the EPA says we could only go 702 miles, assuming all highway driving. Could we make up 300 miles with careful driving? That spells both challenge and fun.
Junkyard Gem: 1977 Dodge Colt Mileage Maker Coupe
Sat, Dec 11 2021While Ford and GM each had the resources to develop their own Michigan-designed subcompacts for the dawn of the 1970s— the Pinto and Vega, respectively— Chrysler couldn't afford the huge price tag for such a project. Instead, Chrysler's European operations were tapped for a couple of models that sold well enough on the other side of the Atlantic, giving us the Plymouth Cricket (known as the Hillman Avenger in the UK) and the Simca 1204 (aka the Simca 1100 in France). American car shoppers gave those two models the cold shoulder, but then Chrysler found genuine sales success by making a deal with Mitsubishi to sell the Colt Galant with left-hand drive. This became the Dodge Colt, with sales beginning in the 1971 model year. Though the 1971-1978 rear-wheel-drive Colts were once as commonplace as Corollas or B210s on American roads, they have all but disappeared today. That makes today's Junkyard Find, discovered in a Denver-area yard last week, particularly interesting. This car shows signs of having been in the hands of a speed-crazed enthusiast owner, including an aftermarket steering wheel and one-piece racing seats with slots for five-point harnesses. The primer-gray paint is another clue. The rear-wheel-drive Colts were reasonably quick for their time, and they could be made genuinely quick with basic engine upgrades. This Mitsubishi Saturn four-banger has a tube header, hot-rod ignition system, and a two-barrel (Mikuni-made) Solex carburetor. We can assume there's probably some kind of cam upgrade under the valve cover, too. The shifter is gone, but the original transmission in this car was either the base four-speed or optional five-speed manual. A three-speed automatic was available for $270 (about $1,275 today). Later on, front-wheel-drive Colts (and Mitsubishi Mirages) could be bought with the Twin-Stick overdrive rig, which gave drivers eight forward speeds and the opportunity to make Twin-Stick beer taps. The 1977-1978 Dodge Colt two- and four-door sedans were based on the Mitsubishi Lancer and were a bit smaller than the 1971-1977 cars, while the wagon version moved to the Galant Sigma platform. The build tag shows that this car started life as the cheapest 1977 Colt model, the "Mileage Maker" two-door sedan (Dodge dealers called it a coupe, so that's what I'm calling it in the title).
Fiat Chrysler wins top Total Quality Award for first time
Mon, Jul 20 2015The Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards are 20 years old in 2015, and Chrysler has never topped the awards before. Until now, that is. Fiat Chrysler takes the overall award on the corporate level with six segment leaders from Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram. The Fiat 500 won Small Multi-Function Car, the 500e won Small Alternative Powertrain, the Dodge Challenger tied at the top in the Specialty Coupe category alongside the very un-coupe Mini Cooper Countryman, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited took the Entry SUV category, the Dodge Durango won in Mid-Size SUV, and Ram took the overall in Best Non-Luxury Brand. The accolade means FCA has gone from one segment winner in 2010 to overall victory in five years. Cars have gotten so good, says Strategic Vision, that it is harder than ever to win. In fact, says the group, 18 years ago 85 percent of all vehicle brands had more than half a problem per vehicle. This year, no brand has more than half a problem per vehicle. The organization measures "over 155 specific aspects of the customer's experience," and scores are based on input from more than 46,000 customers. Other notables in and near the winner's circle include Volkswagen and General Motors, who tied for second place on the corporate scale, one point behind FCA. The Mini Cooper Roadster scored the highest of any model, the Corvette Stingray Convertible and Coupe scored the second- and third-highest. The Chevrolet Colorado is the first domestic Standard Pickup winner in more than ten years, and the Nissan Titan carried the Full-Size Pickup category. The press release below has all the details on how winners and losers are selected, and the full list of automakers and how they finished. "The Customer's 'Total' Experience Defines Quality, Fiat Chrysler Scores Highest in Total Quality," says Strategic Vision The 2015 Total Quality Awards® SAN DIEGO, Friday, July 17, 2015 — Unknown to many, when some consumer research firms rank a car company's quality performance they often do so by simply "counting problems." In the past, this may have been acceptable, but in today's modern and efficient manufacturing world the difference between the worst brand and best brand is LESS than half-a-problem per vehicle. Thus, any "quality ranking" based on this method is severely lacking in the complete picture of the "Total" Quality experience that customers actually use to judge their product ownership.



