2000 Chrysler Sebring Jx Convertible 2-door 2.5l on 2040-cars
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.5L 2497CC 152Cu. In. V6 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Chrysler
Model: Sebring
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: JX Convertible 2-Door
Options: Cassette Player, Leather Seats, Convertible
Drive Type: FWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 150,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: JXI
Exterior Color: Gold
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 6
HAVE FOR SALE A 2000 SEBING CONVERTIBLE. CAR IS IN VERY GOOD CONDITION. LEATHER INTERIOR. INTERIOR JUST NEEDS TO BE CLEANED. CAR HAS BEEN SITTING IN THE GARAGE A LITTLE OVER A YEAR. I HAVE THE BOOT FOR THE CONVERTIBLE TOP ALSO. I HAVE NEW BRAKES AND TIRES ON THE CAR. THE ENGINE IS IN VERY GOOD CONDITION. THE VEHICLE NEEDS SOME VALVE COVER GASKETS, TRANSMISSION WORK, A WHEEL BEARING ON RIGHT SIDE AND A HOOD. OTHER THAN THAT THE CAR HAS NO RUST DENTS OR DINGS. IF INTERESTED CALL 313-948-0071.
Chrysler Sebring for Sale
1998 chrysler sebring jxi convertible 2-door 2.5l only 86 k miles
2003 134k dealer trade absolute sale $1.00 no reserve look!
01 chrysler sebring convt limited*1 owner*58k*gorgeous*fla winter resident*mint(US $5,900.00)
Stunning 02 chrysler sebring "limited" convertible-1 owner-57k miles-no reserve!
1998 chrysler sebring jxi convertible 2-door 2.5l
2006 chrysler sebring base sedan 4-door 2.4l
Auto Services in Michigan
Zielke Tires & Towing ★★★★★
Your Auto Service Inc ★★★★★
Victory Motors ★★★★★
Tireman Central Auto Center ★★★★★
Thomas Auto Collision ★★★★★
Tel-Ford Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
FCA goes big on little Fiat 500 EV, plans to build 80,000
Thu, Jul 11 2019TURIN, Italy — Fiat Chrysler plans to invest 700 million euros ($787 million) in an electric makeover of its iconic Fiat 500, a top executive said on Thursday, as the automaker seeks to move on from its failed bid to merge with France's Renault. FCA's chief operating officer for Europe, Middle East and Africa, Pietro Gorlier, announced the investment — the Italian-American company's biggest single bet on an electric vehicle — at its Mirafiori plan in Turin, northern Italy. "The plan is confirmed," Gorlier told reporters, when asked if FCA's investment in electric vehicle technology would remain unchanged after its $35 billion plan to merge with Renault, an electric car pioneer, collapsed last month. He said FCA would invest the 700 million euros to build a new production line at Mirafiori to turn out 80,000 of the new 500 BEV, its first battery electric vehicle to be marketed in Europe after a smaller, initial foray in the United States. Production will start in the second quarter of 2020, with capacity to be expanded later, Gorlier said. The 500 compact car is one of the group's most famous models, launched by Fiat in the late 1950s and quickly becoming a symbol of Italian urban design. The 700 million euros investment is part of a plan announced last year to invest 5 billion euros in Italy up to 2021. In abandoning its merger offer for Renault, FCA blamed French politics for scuttling what would have been a landmark deal to create the world's third-biggest automaker. Featured Gallery Fiat 500e Green Chrysler Fiat Electric
The Chrysler Pacifica has clever 'Stow 'n Place' roof rack crossbars
Fri, Mar 12 2021While we focused yesterday on all the places you can store stuff (and especially bottles) inside the Toyota Sienna interior, today I thought I'd point out how another minivan makes it easier to store stuff up on the roof. The 2021 Chrysler Pacifica includes a clever integrated roof rack system dubbed "Stow 'N Place" that basically lets you store the cross bars on the van itself rather than somewhere in the garage. But wait, can't you always just leave crossbars on your car? Sure, if you want to live with extra wind noise and a fuel economy reduction. You see, the Pacifica stores them flush within a rail unit running length-wise with the roof. Basically, they're hidden away until you need them. The Subaru Outback has something similar to this, which we've previously reviewed. With its integrated crossbars, you just flip open a latch, fling the bar to the opposite side of the car and plug it in. Then repeat. It couldn't be simpler. Although the Chrysler system is more complicated, it does have a key advantage. Let's see how they work. Chrysler tries to use chrome trim in order to create the visual illusion of raised roof rails from afar, but up close ... ... they clearly aren't. It's just a G.O.B.-grade illusion created by the chrome trim arching over black plastic trim. You have to unscrew each end of the bars by turning these little pieces. The bars are then completely detached from the van. You then have to articulate each of the bars so that they go from their straight, flush-mounted position to the necessary raised position. That's quite easy to do. Be careful, though as these suckers are sturdy metal. You don't want to drop one onto those fancy glass roof panels. Subaru avoids all this and allows you to simply swing the bar across by utilizing a bulky rail housing that raises them up to the necessary height, but provides a visual that probably gives some car designers nightmares.  There are letters at each mounting point that align to those on a bar end. So, make sure to go A with A, D with D, etc. However, you have two options for placing the C/D bar, meaning you're not stuck with a one-size-must-fit-all gap as with the Subaru. This is without question the advantage to Chrysler's approach here. So voila! What once didn't have crossbars now has them. It might not take seconds as with the Outback, but they're sure-as-hell quicker and easier to install than aftermarket crossbars.
Fiat Chrysler wins top Total Quality Award for first time
Mon, Jul 20 2015The Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards are 20 years old in 2015, and Chrysler has never topped the awards before. Until now, that is. Fiat Chrysler takes the overall award on the corporate level with six segment leaders from Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram. The Fiat 500 won Small Multi-Function Car, the 500e won Small Alternative Powertrain, the Dodge Challenger tied at the top in the Specialty Coupe category alongside the very un-coupe Mini Cooper Countryman, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited took the Entry SUV category, the Dodge Durango won in Mid-Size SUV, and Ram took the overall in Best Non-Luxury Brand. The accolade means FCA has gone from one segment winner in 2010 to overall victory in five years. Cars have gotten so good, says Strategic Vision, that it is harder than ever to win. In fact, says the group, 18 years ago 85 percent of all vehicle brands had more than half a problem per vehicle. This year, no brand has more than half a problem per vehicle. The organization measures "over 155 specific aspects of the customer's experience," and scores are based on input from more than 46,000 customers. Other notables in and near the winner's circle include Volkswagen and General Motors, who tied for second place on the corporate scale, one point behind FCA. The Mini Cooper Roadster scored the highest of any model, the Corvette Stingray Convertible and Coupe scored the second- and third-highest. The Chevrolet Colorado is the first domestic Standard Pickup winner in more than ten years, and the Nissan Titan carried the Full-Size Pickup category. The press release below has all the details on how winners and losers are selected, and the full list of automakers and how they finished. "The Customer's 'Total' Experience Defines Quality, Fiat Chrysler Scores Highest in Total Quality," says Strategic Vision The 2015 Total Quality Awards® SAN DIEGO, Friday, July 17, 2015 — Unknown to many, when some consumer research firms rank a car company's quality performance they often do so by simply "counting problems." In the past, this may have been acceptable, but in today's modern and efficient manufacturing world the difference between the worst brand and best brand is LESS than half-a-problem per vehicle. Thus, any "quality ranking" based on this method is severely lacking in the complete picture of the "Total" Quality experience that customers actually use to judge their product ownership.
