2007 Chevrolet Uplander Ls on 2040-cars
914 E 4th Ave, Red Springs, North Carolina, United States
Engine:Gas/Ethanol V6 3.9L/238
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic w/OD
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1GNDV23WX7D187577
Stock Num: A3337
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Uplander LS
Year: 2007
Exterior Color: Polar Blue Metallic
Interior Color: Medium Gray
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 59209
2007 UPLANDER LS EXTENDED WHEELBASE, LOW MILES, 7-PASSENGER SEATING, 25 HWY MPG, 3.9 LITER V6 ENGINE, 4-SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION, FRONT BUCKET SEATS WITH CLOTH TRIM, 2ND ROW BUCKETS, 3RD ROW BENCH, TILT, CRUISE, POWER WINDOWS & LOCKS, KEYLESS ENTRY, CD PLAYER, ONSTAR DELETE, ABS BRAKES Baker Chevrolet was established in 1987 and is located in Red Springs, NC, 14 miles west of I-95. At Baker Chevrolet our goal is to post our lowest price, have the best selection, and sell the nicest pre-owned vehicles on the East Coast. Most of our pre-owned inventory consist of local trades, GM Company cars, and lease turn-ins. We use multiple finance sources and can help arrange transportation.
Chevrolet Uplander for Sale
2008 chevrolet uplander lt(US $9,000.00)
2008 chevrolet uplander ls(US $10,900.00)
2006 chevrolet uplander lt(US $9,864.00)
2007 chevrolet uplander(US $4,495.00)
2007 chevrolet uplander lt(US $9,495.00)
2006 chevrolet uplander ls(US $6,450.00)
Auto Services in North Carolina
Window Genie ★★★★★
West Lee St Tire And Automotive Service Center Inc ★★★★★
Upstate Auto and Truck Repair ★★★★★
United Transmissions Inc ★★★★★
Total Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★
Supreme Lube & Svc Ctr ★★★★★
Auto blog
2016 Chevrolet Volt First Drive
Fri, Oct 2 2015There's a hit vehicle hiding in GM's formula for the Chevy Volt. You can sense it in the enthusiasm that current Volt drivers have for their cars. You can see it in the amount of money GM has poured into its extended-range electric vehicle project. And perhaps most importantly, you can feel it from the driver's seat of the new, second-gen model. The big question is whether or not GM will be able to turn its much-hyped 'halo car' into a best-seller this time around. After driving it in northern California, I can tell you that the Volt is tremendous. But we all know it takes more than that to create a hit. GM has so far sold over 82,000 Volts in the US. That's respectable, but in the early, glory days before the car launched, company representatives were talking about much more impressive numbers. With a few years to talk to customers and potential prospects, GM has learned a lot about what makes someone buy a Volt. For the 2016 model, Chevy has changed just about everything for the better. The new Volt has more all-electric range (53 miles vs. 38 in the first generation), is more fuel efficient whether you're looking at the overall value (106 combined MPGe vs. 98) or just when the car burns gas (42 miles per gallon vs. 37). All of that means that the car's overall range is bumped up to 420 miles, from 380. The battery is smaller and lighter while offering more energy capacity. The range-extending gas engine is bigger (1.5 liters vs. 1.4) but it's also more efficient and can burn regular gasoline instead of just premium. The Volt's overall range is bumped up to 420 miles, from 380. The cost is lower, too: $33,995 vs. $34,170, before incentives. This is a car that GM thinks will compete against the Toyota Priuses and Nissan Leafs of the world (as its new ads make abundantly clear). All three cars have completely different powertrains, but we all know that they're the headline green cars of our time (along with Tesla), so buyers will have to want to pony up a bit more money if they like what the Volt is offering. The 2016 Leaf with its 107-mile range starts at $37,640 (before incentives), while a 2015 Prius can be had for $25,035 (pricing for the 2016 has not yet been announced). So, on paper, the new Volt is an all-around winner. I'm here to tell you that it wins on the road, too. You can't help but notice the changes. They are literally front and center.
GM's MPG overstatement could affect 2 million vehicles
Tue, May 17 2016Late last week, GM admitted that three of its large SUVs fuel economy window stickers did not match their actual efficiency ratings, and so the vehicles couldn't be sold. The stickers on the 2016 Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Buick Enclave said their ratings were one to two miles per gallon better than they should have been. Officially, the number of affected vehicles sits at about 60,000. But Consumer Reports makes a good point: what's up with all of the previous model year SUVs that are basically the same vehicle? To wit: the 2016 model year vehicles are not substantially different than the 2015 or the 2014, or even going all the way back to 2007. On the EPA's fuel economy website, all of these older models will "have better stated fuel economy numbers than the new vehicles in GM's dealerships," Consumer Reports noted. CR's best point, and the one that makes the 60,000 number potentially grow to 2 million if all of the vehicles built on this platform are affected, is that "[i]t seems unlikely that the company would change the powertrain on these carryover models so late in their model cycles in a way that would cause a dramatic, negative impact on fuel economy." GM says that earlier model year SUVs are not affected and the EPA did not respond to CR's question about the potential for more discrepancies. We've seen automakers reverse course before, so if GM has to come out with a mea culpa soon, don't be surprised. GM is rushing corrected stickers to dealers so that the SUVs can be sold again, but a fix for the already-sold vehicles could be trickier to solve. Related Video: Related Gallery 2013 GMC Acadia View 16 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Buick Chevrolet GMC Fuel Efficiency mpg gmc acadia chevy traverse
Texas sues GM, saying it tricked customers into sharing driving data sold to insurers
Wed, Aug 14 2024Texas filed a lawsuit Tuesday against GM over years of alleged abuse of customers' data and trust. New car owners were presented with a "confusing and highly misleading" process that was implied to be for their safety, but "was no more than a deceptively designed sales flow" that surrendered their data for GM to sell. The suit contends that at no point was selling driving data ever even suggested as a possibility, putting GM in violation of the state's consumer protection laws. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is seeking a jury trial and at least $10,000 per offense (every GM car sold in the state since 2015) and a hefty add-on of $250,000 in cases where the victim was over 65. Texas seems to be flying high after a recent $1.4 billion settlement from Meta over other privacy concerns. This may well be a way to solve any pending budgetary issues in the Lone Star State.






















