Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1957 Chevy 3100 Napco 4x4 on 2040-cars

Year:1957 Mileage:0 Color: turquiose /
 n/a
Location:

Grant, Nebraska, United States

Grant, Nebraska, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:n/a
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 3A57W107348 Year: 1957
Number of Cylinders: n/a
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Other Pickups
Trim: 3100
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Drive Type: 4x4
Mileage: 0
Exterior Color: turquiose
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: n/a
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This auction is for a 1957 chevy pickup 3100 original napco 4x4. this truck does not have an engine. comes with all the body parts and with a few extras extra doors and box steps and a few other things. there is some rust on fenders and a little on the doors cab corners and some rust on the inside of the windshield frame. frame looks to be in good shape. the box is in great shape some dents but hardly any rust. all good glass. gvw tag says 5400. originally had a 6 cylinder. the seat is gone. fuel tank is gone. the dash components are all there. the rims and tires are 16". The pictures of the complete truck are what it looked like when I first got it. This truck is nearly completely tore down as seen in the rest of the pictures. The axles and the cab are still on the frame. when i got the truck the rear end out  when i took it apart i found that the third member was cracked and the gears were badly worn. my wife says im crazy to sell it but i lost interest in working on it dont and  really have the tools to complete this project.  this truck  is to be picked up or shipped on buyers expense. hopefully i took enough pictures to answer any questions but however if there are any questions please ask. my phone number is 308-353-0049 call or text. Serious bidders only.    thank you    happy bidding and good luck   

Auto Services in Nebraska

Troy`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tires-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 1329 Dawes Ave, Davey
Phone: (402) 477-7182

Rojam Machine ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Machine Shop
Address: 8520 G St, Waterloo
Phone: (402) 593-9803

Parkway 66 Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 4749 Normal Blvd, Roca
Phone: (402) 423-7711

Ming Auto Beauty Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Detailing
Address: 5601 S 56th St, Hickman
Phone: (402) 421-3634

Lakeside Auto Recyclers ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 907 Locust St, Papillion
Phone: (712) 347-6561

CARSTAR Glenn`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 2051 K St, Papillion
Phone: (402) 475-8441

Auto blog

GM won't really kill off the Chevy Volt and Cadillac CT6, will it?

Fri, Jul 21 2017

General Motors is apparently considering killing off six slow-selling models by 2020, according to Reuters. But is that really likely? The news is mentioned in a story where UAW president Dennis Williams notes that slumping US car sales could threaten jobs at low-volume factories. Still, we're skeptical that GM is really serious about killing those cars. Reuters specifically calls out the Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Sonic, and the Chevrolet Volt. Most of these have been redesigned or refreshed within the past few model years. Four - the LaCrosse, Impala, CT6, and Volt - are built in the Hamtramck factory in Detroit. That plant has made only 35,000 cars this year - down 32 percent from 2016. A typical GM plant builds 200,000-300,000 vehicles a year. Of all the cars Williams listed, killing the XTS, Impala, and Sonic make the most sense. They're older and don't sell particularly well. On the other hand, axing the other three seems like an odd move. It would leave Buick and Cadillac without flagship sedans, at least until the rumored Cadillac CT8 arrives. The CT6 was a big investment for GM and backing out after just a few years would be a huge loss. It also uses GM's latest and best materials and technology, making us even more skeptical. The Volt is a hugely important car for Chevrolet, and supplementing it with a crossover makes more sense than replacing it with one. Offering one model with a range of powertrain variants like the Hyundai Ioniq and Toyota Prius might be another route GM could take. All six of these vehicles are sedans, Yes, crossover sales are booming, but there's still a huge market for cars. Backing away from these would be essentially giving up sales to competitors from around the globe. The UAW might simply be publicly pushing GM to move crossover production to Hamtramck to avoid closing the plant and laying off workers. Sales of passenger cars are down across both GM and the industry. Consolidating production in other plants and closing Hamtramck rather than having a single facility focus on sedans might make more sense from a business perspective. GM is also trying to reduce its unsold inventory, meaning current production may be slowed or halted while current cars move into customer hands. There's a lot of politics that goes into building a car. GM wants to do what makes the most sense from a business perspective, while the UAW doesn't workers to lose their jobs when a factory closes.

GM says EVs are the future — but trucks are going to take it there

Fri, Jan 11 2019

In the PowerPoint deck for the General Motors Capital Markets Day presentation, one of the more disturbing things comes early on, during GM President Mark Reuss' initial remarks, in an area where he is discussing the company's overall strength in trucks. The point being made is that GM has a truck for all and sundry. And there it is, a phrase on a slide that should send chills up the spines of those who still pine for the old Bob Seger "Like a Rock" Silverado ads: "Little bit country. Little bit rock 'n' roll." That's right. Donny and Marie. Somehow the Denis Leary snark in the F-150 ads is all the more appealing. The Capital Markets Day presentation was chock full of observations about electrification and automation (Reuss and CEO Mary Barra both noted that the corporation's vision is one of "Zero Crashes. Zero Emissions. Zero Congestion." Dan Ammann talked about the progress being made at Cruise Automation; Reuss rolled out the plan for an array of electrified vehicles, with a luxury EV and a compact SUV being the "Centroid Entries" for the modular bases of many others). But it is worth noting that there is no getting away from the power of pickups in the U.S. market, as that was the central topic in Chief Financial Officer Dhivya Suryadevara's comments, with "Truck Franchise" being flanked by "Key Financial Priorities" and "Financial Outlook." Clearly, to gloss the old phrase, the truck segment is where the money is. Suryadevra enumerated how the truck segment is significantly different than other types of light vehicles. Among her points: GM, Ford and FCA have more than 90% of market share. The truck parc has been growing and aging over the past 10 years. Customers are fiercely loyal to the segment—as in 70% of truck buyers are truck buyers. A good number of the vehicles are for commercial use (40 percent). Trucks are "less prone to. . .mobility disruption." Trucks offer high margins. Translaton: The segment is one that they're solidly positioned in. There are lots of old trucks on the road that will need to be replaced by new ones. Perhaps buyers may switch from a Sierra to a Canyon, but it will be a truck. If your livelihood depends on that type of vehicle, even if gas prices go up or the economy begins to go south, you're going to stick with it. Most of the country isn't San Francisco, so trucks will continue to be essential. And, well, they're profitable in the extreme.

GM issues stop-sale for 3 SUVs over incorrect MPG rating

Fri, May 13 2016

This week, GM sent a memo to Chevy, GMC, and Buick dealers to tell them to stop selling three SUVS. The 2016 Chevy Traverse, the GMC Acadia, and the Buick Enclave all have EPA window stickers that show higher fuel economy ratings than the vehicles actually have. Unlike other recent – and very public – fuel economy ratings problems from VW and Mitsubishi, it doesn't seem like GM did anything wrong with the testing for these vehicles, it just misprinted the labels. New labels are being printed and should arrive at dealerships this weekend and early next week. After that, the SUVs will be able to be sold and delivered again. The official fuel economy rating for the three SUVs are all the same. The correct numbers for the all-wheel drive versions are 17 miles per gallon combined, 15 city, and 22 highway. The stickers say the SUVs get 17/24/19. The front-wheel driver models were also incorrectly labeled, and the total number of affected vehicles is 59,823. In the memo, GM said the problem was caused by an "inadvertent error," Automotive News says. GM is working with the EPA to solve the issue. We have asked GM for a comment on the mistake and will update this post if we hear back. Related Gallery 2013 GMC Acadia View 16 Photos News Source: Automotive News – sub. req. Government/Legal Green Buick Chevrolet GM GMC Fuel Efficiency mpg gmc acadia chevy traverse