3500 Express Cargo Van Msrp $33,465.00-$7,500 Off-hurry-hurry -hurry on 2040-cars
Buffalo, Minnesota, United States
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:6.0L
Body Type:Minivan, Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Options: Trailering Pkg, Our last Cargo Van!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Make: Chevrolet
Safety Features: Fixed Glass Rear Door, 6.0L Engine, Convenience Pkg(cruise-Tilt), Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Model: Express
Power Options: Locking Diff-Cold Climate Pkg-Tilt-Cruise, Best Deal On the Internet-Last One-Hurry, Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks
Mileage: 67
Sub Model: Rwd 3500 135 wb(short wheelbase)
Exterior Color: Red
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Interior Color: Gray
Vehicle Inspection: Inspected (include details in your description)
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: work truck
Drive Type: rwd
Chevrolet Express for Sale
2012 chevrolet express 15-passenger explorer limited hightop conversion van
2006 chevy express 3500 box truck 15 foot (( 5,194 miles)) car fax,books,records(US $14,999.00)
2006 chevrolet express 6.0 v-8 rocky ridge hightop conversion van
2005 chevrolet express 1500 custom conversion van(US $21,000.00)
2001 white chevrolet express 2500 cargo van(US $3,000.00)
1988 chevrolet hi-top custom conversion van(US $1,895.00)
Auto Services in Minnesota
Victory Auto Service & Glass ★★★★★
Victory Auto Service & Glass ★★★★★
Trevis Transmission ★★★★★
T & M Towing & Snow Plowing, Inc. ★★★★★
S & T Auto Repair ★★★★★
Rising Star Auto Sales ★★★★★
Auto blog
Smaller Cars Endure Big Problems On Crash Test
Wed, Jan 22 2014In a crash test of 11 of the smallest cars on the market, only one vehicle received an acceptable rating. The rest received marginal or poor ratings in the study, providing evidence that supports a widely held notion that smaller cars are among the least safe on the road. No other vehicle group has performed as poorly on a new crash test than these mini cars, says the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the nonprofit group that conducted the testing. The latest results of which were released Wednesday. The Chevrolet Spark was the only car earning an overall "acceptable" rating on the small-front overlap test, and even that vehicle had its shortcomings, IIHS said. "Small lightweight vehicles have an inherent safety disadvantage," said Joe Nolan, the senior vice president for vehicle research at IIHS. "That's why it's even more important to choose one with the best occupant protection. Unfortunately, as a group, minicars aren't performing as well as other vehicle categories." The Mazda2, Kia Rio, Toyota Yaris and certain Ford Fiesta models all received "marginal" overall grades on the test, while the Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, Toyota Prius C, Hyundai Accent, Fiat 500 and Honda Fit all earned "poor" ratings. Results from these sub-compact cars fare much worse than vehicles sized just a little bit bigger, IIHS said. Among 17 cars evaluated in the small category, five earned "good" ratings and five more earned "acceptable." Only introduced a year ago, the small-front overlap test has quickly become a key indicator of differences in automotive safety. IIHS introduced it as a way to replicate what happens when the front corner of a vehicle collides with a tree or utility pole at 40 miles per hour. In the real world, these sorts of accidents are more dangerous than others, in part because they bypass the front-end crush zones on most cars. TOP 5Most Researched Sedans 2013 Honda Accord MSRP : $21,680 2013 Hyundai Sonata MSRP : $20,895 2013 Nissan Altima MSRP : $21,760 2014 Honda Accord MSRP : $21,955 2013 Toyota Corolla MSRP : $16,230 Automakers have been rushing to make design changes to the front ends of their cars. Without a grade of acceptable or better, they cannot qualify for the IIHS' overall Top Safety Pick+ honor, given annually to the safest models on the market.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #313 LIVE!
Mon, 17 Dec 2012We record Autoblog Podcast #313 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #313
2014 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra introduced
Chevy confirms 2016 Camaro will have wheels, brakes
Thu, Apr 9 2015Good news, everyone! Chevrolet has issued yet another round of teaser images and information about the sixth-generation Camaro, set to debut in Detroit on May 16. This time around, Chevy's teaser images confirm that the new car will not only have wheels and tires (Goodyear Eagle F1s, no less), but brakes as well. On top of that, we now know that the new Camaro will be 28-percent stiffer than the outgoing model. "The more rigid body structure allowed the engineers to more precisely calibrate the steering and suspension systems because they didn't have to compensate for chassis flex. The lighter structure also enabled the size and mass of elements such as the wheels, tires and brakes to be scaled accordingly," GM said in a press release, which you can read below. We've already learned that the new coupe will be 200 pounds lighter than its predecessor, has a bunch of unique parts, and according to GM's Mark Reuss, will outperform the Ford Mustang in every way. Now, it's only a matter of time before we see the sixth-gen Camaro, but surely not before Chevy issues even more teasers and information. Related Video: 2016 Camaro is Stronger, Lighter and More Responsive Computer aided engineering contributes to 28 percent greater structural stiffness DETROIT – The engineering team spent 9 million hours of computational time honing the driving experience of the all-new 2016 Chevrolet Camaro before the first prototype turned a wheel. The structural modeling led to the Gen 6 Camaro being 28 percent stiffer than the current model. "The modeling abilities of computer aided engineering are advancing at incredible rates," said Jim Karlavage, Camaro program engineering manager. "Today, we can accurately model opportunities to add torsional strength without adding unnecessary mass. The result is a lighter, stiffer structure that benefits every aspect of the driving experience." The more rigid body structure allowed the engineers to more precisely calibrate the steering and suspension systems because they didn't have to compensate for chassis flex. The lighter structure also enabled the size and mass of elements such as the wheels, tires and brakes to be scaled accordingly. "The structural weight savings are compounded by opportunities to reduce un-sprung weight," said Karlavage.