Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1967 Chevy Short Box Pickup on 2040-cars

Year:1967 Mileage:60000
Location:

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Traverse City, Michigan, United States
Advertising:

R uns great. New 35in tires. Dana 60 axels front and rear. Low geared for off road use; however it can be driven easily on the road. i bought it and it had not moved in yrs and did not run so i had the pickup guys winch it on the truck and winched it off and put in my gar i new the motor turned so i worked on it a couple days cleaned carb changed oil checked wires and finally saw where it was not hooked up fron starter to battery and went to check it and it started rite up but did not let it run cause of the gas the man said do not run it on the gas thats in it very old so i hooked it up to a can of new hi oct gas with elect pump and 5gal of gas and started it up run great and has nice mufflers on it shifter a little loose but worked and backed out of my gar and let it run about 10min checked under the hood nothing bad had oil and water still in it good oil pressure that gauge worked rest need to be hooked up temp,gas tach,volts etc glass good wipers work brakes are great lights out work with not much work u could take off with it bud i am 65 and need a ladder to get in it  i have a new knee i had a couple mech look at it and said the front and rear 3rd members were either 60s in back and 50 dana in front build very solid and rides nice . i am done as far as i can go on it so i will work on a 48 5window chevy all orig even 90percent of the paint i was told so the 67 is ready for sombody younger to have fun with and get all the looks  good luck  low reserve look it up in nada book for a 67very good shortbox price i am way below that  so buy your 4wheeler now with a rare motor set up and 400auto

Auto Services in Michigan

Westside Transmission Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 5781 Westside Saginaw Rd, Reese
Phone: (989) 667-0120

Venom Motorsports Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Customizing
Address: Hale
Phone: (616) 635-2519

Vanderhoof`s Small Eng Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 277 Old US Highway 131, Leroy
Phone: (231) 832-3445

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 5030 W Saginaw Hwy, Dimondale
Phone: (517) 321-2822

U S Auto Supply ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: 2346 W Warren Ave, Hazel-Park
Phone: (313) 894-1194

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 90 S Waverly Rd, Holland
Phone: (616) 394-0880

Auto blog

Why an independent rear suspension for GM's new, full-sized SUVs wasn't easy

Mon, Dec 23 2019

A Motor Trend report last month laid out how Cadillac's 4.2-lier twin-turbo Blackwing V8 could be an orphan due to cost concerns in the GM empire. Last-minute chassis changes to Cadillac's new sedans and XT6 crossover led to engine bays that couldn't fit the Blackwing. On the SUV side, according to the report, the new independent rear suspension for big people haulers cost so much to implement that GM ruled out reworking the Escalade to accept the Blackwing. At least one commenter rightly asked how could a suspension swallow that much money. A new piece in Motor Trend has the answer. The excellent Alissa Priddle spoke to Tim Herrick, GM's executive chief engineer for full-size trucks, about why the clean-sheet IRS cost "multimillions of dollars."  First, GM would need to build a new body shop at the Arlington, Texas plant that assembles the automaker's big SUVs to stamp the numerous wholly new parts and panels accommodating an IRS. Then GM would need to design and pay for a new assembly process. On top of those up-front costs, there was the incremental cost of the four-link IRS components being more expensive than those in the trucks' former leaf-sprung solid axles. Herrick endured so many rejections for so long that he remembers the date and time when he got approval for the new unit. He said it came down to a meeting where he told a higher-up, "I'll make you a deal: If we get to the reveal, or if we launch this and you think this was a dumb idea, I'll hand you my badge and let you walk me out." Head to Motor Trend to read the full story. Based on Herrick being on stage to help present the new SUVs to the press, and on our First Ride in the new Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban at GM's Milford Proving Grounds, it appears this will have a happy ending for all involved. Furthermore, since Herrick worked on the T1 platform that supports the big SUVs as well as the light- and heavy-duty pickups, he understood the demands on the commercial side, too. That could be why when Roadshow asked Tim Asoklis, chief engineer of the Tahoe and Suburban, if the new IRS could endure life in the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra, Asoklis answered, "Oh, absolutely." Related Video:    

2016 Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid Quick Spin [w/video]

Wed, Jan 20 2016

If a Chevy Volt is like a hybrid that prefers its electric motor, then the new Malibu hybrid is like a Volt you never have to plug in. That's partly because you can't plug it in, but more because the Volt and the gas-electric Malibu share a lot of major components. Since we happen to like the newly refined Volt, that's good news for the larger family sedan. The shared parts include the blended braking system, A/C compressor, the auxiliary power module, and most of the hybrid transaxle (what you might call a fancy electro-transmission). In the Malibu, the electric motors use neodymium magnets for efficiency and power, while the Volt has weaker ferrite magnets to reduce drag, and the Volt also gets an extra clutch to lock out the engine. The two use different batteries, with their size, power capabilities, and chemistry suited to the task for each vehicle. Unlike most of the midsized sedan leaders, the Malibu has never had a full hybrid option. For a few years in the last generation, Chevy offered the Malibu Eco with a version of GM's eAssist mild-hybrid system, which featured a small motor-generator in place of an alternator hooked up to a bigger battery that could harvest energy during deceleration and add some back in when you hit the throttle; it also brought engine stop-start functionality to save a little more fuel. But it saved only a little fuel, so eAssist was nixed in favor of a more efficient four-cylinder with a standalone stop-start system. Driving Notes Mode switches between gas and electric are just as smooth as in the Volt. No shudder or weirdness in the throttle. It drives as much like a gas-only car as any midsized hybrid does. The blended braking system is also noticeably well sorted. There's no deadness in the pedal, no touchiness, and no artificial, wooden feeling when you step through the regen portion of its travel. There's nothing abrupt or jarring about any of the experience, and the Malibu's baked-in quietness helps to deal with noise from the somewhat coarse 1.8-liter gas engine. Engine startup and shutdown are noisy from outside, but much less noticeable from within. The 2016 Malibu is larger yet lighter. The hybrid weighs about 125 pounds more than a comparably equipped 1.5T. You don't notice the extra weight, but there is some space eaten out of the trunk by the battery.

'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia

Fri, Jan 16 2015

These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer