1965 C10 Pick-up Short Bed Fleetside With "no Reserve" on 2040-cars
El Paso, Texas, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:283
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: C-10
Trim: 1965 SHORT BED FLEETSIDE PICK-UP V8
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Drive Type: Automatic
Mileage: 98,929
Exterior Color: Brown
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Red
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
I'M SELLING WITH "NO RESERVE" A 1965 CHEVY C10 PICK UP SHORT BED FLEETSIDE WITH CLEAN TEXAS TITLE (VIN: C1445Z119292) THE TRUCK RUNS AND DRIVES, IT HAS A 283 V8 ENGINE, I DON'T KNOW IF IS MATCHING NUMBERS AND IT WAS ORIGINAL MANUAL TRASMISSION BUT IT WAS CONVERTED TO AUTOMATIC TRASMISSION FLOOR SHIFT. THE SHIFTHER IS IN THE WRONG POSITION AND THE SHIFTING IS BACKWARDS, THE TRANSMISSION OIL PAN IS LEAKING OIL IT MAY NEED A NEW GASKET. ALL GLASS IS GOOD, THE FRONT BUMPER WAS REPLACE, THE FLOOR HAS SOME RUST AND I'M INCLUDING THE REPLACEMENT PIECES OF SHEET METAL FOR THE FLOOR, THE FRONT FENDERS HAVE SOME RUST CLOSE TO THE DOORS, AND INSIDE THERE IS SOME RUST ON THE BOTTOM FRONT OF THE DOORS. THE ENGINE RUNS BUT YOU CAN SEE SOME SMOKE COMING OUT OF THE TAIL PIPE, THE SPARK PLUGS WERE REPLACED AND IT HAS A NEW BATERY. THE MUFFLER WAS REPLACED, THE BRAKES WORK GOOD BUT IT MAY NEED REPLACEMENT, THE RADIO IS MISSING ON THE DASH AND THE SUN VISORS. THE BED IS MISSING THE WOOD STRIPS AND THE WOOD WAS REPLACED WITH A PIECE OF PLYWOOD, ALSO THE REAR WHEEL HOUSE ARE MISSING. THE TIRES ARE GOOD BUT THEY ARE STARTING TO CRACK, IT HAS ORIGINAL KEYS
THE TRUCK IS SOLD "AS IS" WITH NO WARRANTY AS A RESTORATION PROJECT AND I HAVE IT FOR SALE LOCALLY SO I HAVE THE RIGHT TO END THE ACTION EARLY. THE WINNING BIDDER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PICK UP THE TRUCK OR FOR SHIPPING COSTS. A $500.00 DEPOSIT IS REQUIRED WITH IN 48 HRS. OF THE BID CLOSING. FULL PAYMENT IS REQUIRED WITH IN 7 DAYS OF ACTION CLOSE. MORE PICTURES ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION CALL VICTOR AT (915) 920-8259. THANK YOU FOR BIDDING.
Chevrolet C-10 for Sale
1964 chevy c-10 stepside 350 v8 400 turbo new paint lots of new parts installed(US $9,000.00)
1976 chevy 1 ton c-10 flatbed dually custom dash!
1968 chevy truck stepside short bed 454 big block hot rod c10 custom 67 rat
1983 chevrolet c10, silverado longbed, 6.2l diesel v8, automatic
1962 chevy truck shortbed/ shortbox - parts 1961 1963 1964 1965 1966
Auto Services in Texas
Your Mechanic ★★★★★
Yale Auto ★★★★★
Wyatt`s Discount Muffler & Brake ★★★★★
Wright Auto Glass ★★★★★
Wise Alignments ★★★★★
Wilkerson`s Automotive & Front End Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.
2016 Chevrolet Camaro First Drive [w/video]
Fri, Oct 16 2015The Autoblog gang was downright stoked to learn the 2016 Chevy Camaro was next on our test-car docket. Then we found out it was the V6 model. Buzzkill. We were hoping for the snorting V8, or at least the spunky new turbo four-cylinder. The V6? Meh. We've been driving V6 Camaros for, like, six years. It's what you buy if you can't afford anything better, or so say horsepower snobs as they wrinkle their noses and cut their coffee with 93 octane. But after a week with the six-pot Camaro, we'll admit it: we were wrong. The all-new 3.6-liter V6 is strong, sounds good, and is damn fun to drive. Its 335 horsepower and 284 pound-feet of torque appear modest by modern standards, but they power the Camaro to 60 miles per hour in 5.1 seconds with the automatic, or in the case of our manual-equipped test car, 5.2 seconds. That's almost half a second quicker than the new turbo four-cylinder model. Yes, it has the same displacement as the old V6. No, it's not the same engine. Upon closer inspection, the V6's potency shouldn't come as a surprise. This engine is from General Motors' newest family of dual-overhead cam powerplants that launched in the Cadillac CTS and ATS. Yes, it has the same displacement as the old V6. No, it's not the same engine. Don't be fooled, and don't underestimate it at stoplights. The strapping V6 is unsuspectingly good, but it's just one of many improvements for the sixth-generation Camaro. Chevy's coupe is lighter, faster, and more modern looking inside and out. It starts with a rear-wheel-drive chassis donated from the Cadillac ATS, though about 70 percent of the components are unique to the Camaro. The 2016 model is about two inches shorter in length (thanks to a shorter wheelbase) and about an inch has been removed from height and width compared to the 2015 model. These lighter underpinnings jumpstarted the Camaro's weight-loss plan, and thanks to extensive use of aluminum, the V6 with the new eight-speed automatic transmission weighs 3,435 pounds – 294 less than its predecessor (the manual-transmission V6 Camaro weighs 3,448 pounds). The V8, meanwhile, sheds 223 pounds. One by one, these elements would merely enhance how the Camaro drives, but taken collectively, they invigorate the new model. It feels much more confident and agile in all circumstances. Put simply, it's a sportier car. View 32 Photos Grab second, let the revs build, and the dual-mode exhaust changes its tune from a low buzz to a rumble, then a growl.
GM follows Ford and Honda in skipping SEMA
Fri, May 20 2022The list of automakers skipping SEMA has become longer. First reported by Muscle Cars and Trucks, and confirmed to us by a company representative, General Motors will not have an official presence at the aftermarket show. It joins Ford and Honda in leaving the show. It will be a large hole in the show, with the GM brands typically filling a significant swath of available show space in one of the main halls. GM hasn't provided much explanation for the move, either. The GM representative provided Autoblog with the same statement that Muscle Cars and Trucks got: "GM has made the decision not to participate in the 2022 SEMA Show. The SEMA show has always inspired us, and accessories and performance parts remain an important part of our business." We also asked if we would see any sort of announcements around the time of the show — Ford said it has plans to share some things around that time — however, the GM representative said that the company has no immediate plans for announcements. Certainly things could change between now and the November show, though. SEMA had previously noted that other exhibitors would help fill in some of the space vacated by these major OEMs. Another OEM, Volkswagen, is returning to the show after an absence, which will also help with the display deficit. Related Video:























