Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2007 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 Short Bed Extended Cab 4x4 on 2040-cars

US $10,975.00
Year:2007 Mileage:166607 Color: Red /
 Gray
Location:

Farmington, Arkansas, United States

Farmington, Arkansas, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: 1GCHK29U97E100948 Year: 2007
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 2500
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Trim: LT Trim
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4 wheel drive
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 166,607
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: SBX 4x4
Exterior Color: Red
Interior Color: Gray
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"All around great truck"

This truck has been well serviced & cared for - it runs & drives excellent. No sign of off-road abuse. Rhino lined bed & B&W Hide away gooseneck hitch. Engine runs smooth - no smoke - great power. Transmission shifts out smoothly. 4 wheel drive goes in and out as should. Interior is in very nice condition. Seats are good. Equipped with steering wheel controls. Exterior is in overall great condition. A very light sign of hail in hood. Bed behind rear wheels has paint missing from road debris - should be an easy touch up. All in all a great honest pickup. Comes with a 3 month - 3,000 mile ASC Drivetrain Plus Warranty. Please call 479.267.1860 or email me if you have questions. This truck is for sale locally, therefore I reserve the right to end auction early due to an on the spot purchase. Thank you.

Auto Services in Arkansas

Wingfoot Commercial Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels
Address: 7791 Alcoa Rd, Shannon-Hills
Phone: (501) 771-2341

Superior Tire & Express Lube ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1210 E Oak St, Enola
Phone: (501) 450-7744

Steve Jones Chrysler Dodge Jeep ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1110 Falls Blvd N, Wynne
Phone: (870) 238-8175

Roberts Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 600 W Martin Luther King Blvd, Greenland
Phone: (479) 444-6528

Rhodes Auto Brokers ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Automobile & Truck Brokers, Truck Brokers
Address: 1401 S Main Street, Moscow
Phone: (870) 536-2275

North Arkansas Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 500 S 7th St, Heber-Springs
Phone: (501) 887-9234

Auto blog

Here's the production Chevy Bolt

Tue, Dec 1 2015

"It looks like a Volt had an evening of regrets with an i3." That's AutoblogGreen editor-in-chief Sebastian Blanco talking about the car you see here, the 2017 Chevy Bolt. Our trusty spy photographers caught the new Bolt EV fully uncovered at a photo shoot, ahead of its official debut at the Consumer Electronics Show in January. To say the styling looks familiar would be an understatement. There's a lot of Volt elements here, and the nod to the BMW i3 is definitely valid. It's not unattractive, it's just sort of, well, there. Never mind, the Bolt will have a lot going for it when it launches, should earlier rumors come to fruition. The hatchback is expected to have a 200-mile electric range, and should cost right around $30,000 after incentives. The Bolt will be built in Michigan, and will likely arrive at dealers in early 2017. Chevy knows this one's going to be huge, and the company is fully committed to launching and marketing the Bolt the right way. We'll have the full details in January at CES. For now, feast your eyes on His Boltness in the gallery above. Let us know what you think about it, in the Comments.

Smaller Cars Endure Big Problems On Crash Test

Wed, Jan 22 2014

In a crash test of 11 of the smallest cars on the market, only one vehicle received an acceptable rating. The rest received marginal or poor ratings in the study, providing evidence that supports a widely held notion that smaller cars are among the least safe on the road. No other vehicle group has performed as poorly on a new crash test than these mini cars, says the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the nonprofit group that conducted the testing. The latest results of which were released Wednesday. The Chevrolet Spark was the only car earning an overall "acceptable" rating on the small-front overlap test, and even that vehicle had its shortcomings, IIHS said. "Small lightweight vehicles have an inherent safety disadvantage," said Joe Nolan, the senior vice president for vehicle research at IIHS. "That's why it's even more important to choose one with the best occupant protection. Unfortunately, as a group, minicars aren't performing as well as other vehicle categories." The Mazda2, Kia Rio, Toyota Yaris and certain Ford Fiesta models all received "marginal" overall grades on the test, while the Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, Toyota Prius C, Hyundai Accent, Fiat 500 and Honda Fit all earned "poor" ratings. Results from these sub-compact cars fare much worse than vehicles sized just a little bit bigger, IIHS said. Among 17 cars evaluated in the small category, five earned "good" ratings and five more earned "acceptable." Only introduced a year ago, the small-front overlap test has quickly become a key indicator of differences in automotive safety. IIHS introduced it as a way to replicate what happens when the front corner of a vehicle collides with a tree or utility pole at 40 miles per hour. In the real world, these sorts of accidents are more dangerous than others, in part because they bypass the front-end crush zones on most cars. TOP 5Most Researched Sedans 2013 Honda Accord MSRP : $21,680 2013 Hyundai Sonata MSRP : $20,895 2013 Nissan Altima MSRP : $21,760 2014 Honda Accord MSRP : $21,955 2013 Toyota Corolla MSRP : $16,230 Automakers have been rushing to make design changes to the front ends of their cars. Without a grade of acceptable or better, they cannot qualify for the IIHS' overall Top Safety Pick+ honor, given annually to the safest models on the market.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.