Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Chevrolet Express 1500 Awd, 4x4, 4 Wheel Drive,cargo Van on 2040-cars

US $13,500.00
Year:2006 Mileage:212002
Location:

North Bend, Ohio, United States

North Bend, Ohio, United States
Advertising:

I am Reluctantly selling my 2006 Chevrolet Express Cargo Van "Very Awesome Work Rig" due to driving an excessively amount of miles per day. I need to get something that gets at least double the 17 MPG Highway that this vehicle gets due to job change. This has been one "Great Remarkable Vehicle". This van has been expertly cared for and babied all its life. It has 212,000 Highway Miles. Oil//Filter/Lube every 3,000 miles. Just had both New Timken Front Hub Bearing Assemblies Installed. Front Differential, Transfercase, Transmission and Rear Differential Fluids Changed every 20,000-30,000 Miles. New Rotors (4), New Brake Pads (Ceramic). This van also features a professionaly installed 3" Lift Kit (MAXXCAM2 Suspension) with Skyjacker Off-Road Extended Shocks so I could run a taller 265/75/16 Tire (Kenda Klever A/T) with absolutely no rub. Push Bar features 2 Round KC 150 Watt Stainless Off-Road Light and 2 Acro Pro Series HID Off-Road Lights. This truck also features: 3/4" LED Running/Brake Lights (6) in rear bumper, rear spoiler featuring 3rd brake light/full width running lights and RH/LH Brake/Turn Signals. Dual Windshield Stobe (Amber/White) Beacon and LED Grill Stobe Lights. This vehicle was unstoppable this past winter with all the ice/snow it never let me down. Like any  vehicle with high mileage it has minor dings, small rock chips, tear in drivers seat (see Photo). It currently has a cracked windsheild but that will be replaced prior to shipping and signing the title over to the new owner. This Interior features vinyl seats, rubber floor, divider behind seats with pass-thru door, Adrian bin package, Additional Interior cargo lights, D-Hooks in floor, computer stand, divider door file holder and center console file bin/storage. Interior Contents (Building Materials/Tools) Not Included. Thanks For Looking! 

Auto Services in Ohio

Zig`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Driveshafts
Address: 3340 Elyria Ave, Amherst
Phone: (440) 244-0130

Zeppetella Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations, Tire Dealers
Address: 28233 Lorain Rd, Strongsville
Phone: (440) 777-8720

Willis Automobile Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3505 Sunflower Rd, Calcutta
Phone: (724) 846-4831

Voss Collision Centre ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 94 Loop Rd, Springboro
Phone: (866) 413-0479

Updated Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Brake Repair
Address: 12146 York Rd, N-Ridgeville
Phone: (440) 582-1992

Tri C Motors ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 22521 State Route 62, Maximo
Phone: (330) 821-5488

Auto blog

2021 Chevy Colorado and GMC Canyon facelift spied

Fri, Sep 20 2019

The Chevy Colorado and its GMC Canyon twin have been on sale for a good long time now, and while things move a little more slowly on the truck side when it comes to facelifts and model changeovers, it seems like it’s about time. So itÂ’s no surprise to see some lightly camouflaged trucks running around ahead of what appears to be a minor refresh for the 2021 model year. Starting with the Colorado, it appears to have a bowtie hiding behind some camo in the center of the grille, which otherwise looks like the no-bowtie option you can get on 2019-and-up trucks. It could be that Chevy is keeping the no-bowtie grille design but allowing a bowtie to grace it, or it could be misdirection. Either way, the grille pattern adds a bit of flair to the otherwise staid front end design. There also appears to be a bit more shape to the lower air inlet, with echoes of some of the lower fascias of its bigger Silverado stablemate. The Canyon, on the other hand, shows more extensive front-end changes. At first glance, it looks to emulate some variants of the GMC Sierra, which would make sense given those modelsÂ’ changes for the 2020 model year. In particular, this Canyon has hints of Sierra HD, being more square and monolithic than the regular Sierra 1500s, although itÂ’s a little hard to tell with the camo covering the edges of the grille. It could certainly also adopt more rounded corners like the 1500s. Either way, itÂ’s more vertical and thereÂ’s less differentiation between the upper grille and lower opening. ThereÂ’s nothing in the way of changes around the sides or back, and while there may be some minor changes inside, we arenÂ’t expecting any. The word around town is that this isnÂ’t a full facelift, but rather a minor front end tweak thatÂ’ll just be a regular part of the model-year changeover. 

With only 246 Volts sold in Australia, Holden not getting next-gen model

Tue, Apr 28 2015

The Chevrolet Volt has not been the resounding success General Motors hoped for here in the United States. But it's fortunes in Chevy's home country are nothing compared to how poorly it's done down under. Only 246 Volts have been sold in Australia, where the car is branded as a Holden, since its debut in 2012. That's not just a bad showing – it's an absolute disaster. According to Motoring.com.au, it was the Volt's astonishing $60,000 price tag, combined with a lack of interest from Aussie drivers, that killed the car's chances. What's fascinating about this development, though, is that it doesn't necessarily seem to be Holden that's pulling the plug. Instead, it's the Volt's Hamtramck, MI factory, which is preparing to shift into production of the second-generation model that seems to be taking the blame. According to Motoring, the plant confirmed that it will only build the Gen 2 plug-in in left-hand-drive form, basically ruling out a model for Australia. "Electric and hybrid vehicles haven't taken off in Australia," Holden's director of communications, Sean Poppitt, told Motoring. "Considering the lack of infrastructure, the lack of government incentives, the large distances between cities, it's a tough sell." The death of the right-hand drive Volt won't be the only loss of business in Hamtramck. Opel has already confirmed that it will drop the plug-in's European fraternal twin, the Ampera, while the next-gen Chevy won't make the trip across the pond either. Related Video:

General Motors and EVs: No stranger to firsts, but where's the leadership?

Tue, Apr 7 2015

2015 is already shaping up to be the year of "affordable, 200-mile EV" concepts. Nissan and Tesla have each been talking about them for some time, the latter promising to unveil its Model 3 at the North American International Auto Show in January before balking when the time came. Instead, Chevrolet beat them all by unveiling the Bolt concept at the same event, followed shortly thereafter with suggestions of a 2016 launch – potentially offering the first nationwide EV with anything close to that range. It was the ballsiest EV-related move General Motors has made in a quarter century. But will it remain so? Exactly 25 years before the Bolt rolled up onto the turntable, then-Chairman Roger Smith unveiled GM's last ground-up EV concept, the even-more-unfortunately-named Impact, at the Los Angeles Auto Show in January 1990. A few months later, he surprised most of his colleagues by announcing its intended production in honor of Earth Day. It was the first modern foray into electric vehicles for the US by any automaker, one that was rewarded by the State of California with what is now known as the Zero Emissions Vehicle mandate. The program not only forced other automakers into competing with Roger's pet project, but inspired all of them to fight it like small children against bedtime. Some years later, the drivers themselves weighed in, with a biting documentary about that obstinance and the leadership it cost both GM and the country. Within months, GM was first back into the fray of plug-in vehicles. Many criticized the company for starting with a PHEV rather than jump straight back into EVs. The choice wasn't totally out of the blue – even EV1 was meant to be followed by a PHEV. And especially on the heels of Who Killed the Electric Car?, some skittishness was understandable: even a successful EV would invite a "we told you so" public reaction, underscoring their mistake in ending the EV1 program. If a new EV didn't do well, they'd be convicted in the public eye as serial killers. All while seeking a federal bailout. For all the flak, the resulting Chevy Volt was and is a better car than GM has ever gotten credit for. But the company seemed to grow weary of having to overcome its varied past, and while the current owners remain happy, much of the stakeholder and community engagement that so effectively built early goodwill and sales growth faded not long after launch. Marketing has been spotty in both consistency and effectiveness.