Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1975 Chevrolet Scottsdale 4x4 C/k 2500 Longbed "a True Survivor" All Original !! on 2040-cars

Year:1975 Mileage:17574
Location:

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Vancouver, Washington, United States
Advertising:

1975 Chevrolet Scottsdale C20 

4 x 4

350 V8 Engine


Automatic Transmission

 
Locking Hubs

 
Heavy Duty  Rear bumper


Tow  Package


Nice  Tires


Original Hupcaps


Original Carpet


Original  Upholstery On Seat


Factory Air Conditon


Long Bed


Dual Fuel Tanks





This Truck Is A True Survivor It Runs And Drives Very Well The Motor Is Very Strong And

  The Transmission Shifts Very Smooth  And The 4x4 Works Great The Body Is All Original

 Condition It Has A few Blemishes On The Paint But Not  To Bad For A truck It's Age . 



So Don't Miss You Chance To Own This Classic Chevrolet For Its Only Being Offered At Auction For 5 Days And Is Being Sold With NO RESERVE, That Means Highest Bidder Takes It..... Please If You Have Any Questions Or Concerns Please Ask Prior To Bidding Thanks And GOOD LUCK!

Call for Questions

(503) 421-1312


PLEASE NOTE: If you have "ZERO" or "NEGATIVE" feedback please call me on my cell before placing live auction bid

 

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THIS VEHICLE INSPECTED, THE INSPECTION MUST BE DONE BEFORE THE AUCTION ENDS!
 
***** Payment Details *****
 
PLEASE HAVE FUNDS READY TO GO IF YOU PLAN ON BUYING THIS VEHICLE, I WILL NOT WAIT ON YOU TO GET APPROVED BY A BANK TO MAKE THIS PURCHASE,,,THANK YOU!
 
I require a $500 deposit within 24 hours after auction close by Paypal or Bank wire transfer and full payment within 72 hours by Bank wire transfer ONLY!
 
After all funds clear I will overnight you the title and bill of sale the next day.
 
This truck is being sold in as is condition with no warranty!
 
***** Shipping Details *****
 

The buyer is fully responsible for paying for the shipping of this vehicle, however if the buyer needs assistance arranging a Shipper/Auto Transporter whether it be local, out of state, or even overseas, I'd be more than happy to help out to make this transaction as smooth and as easy as possible. 

This vehicle is sold AS-IS "NO WARRANTY" due to WASHINGTON  law for used vehicles.

Thanks And Happy Bidding.


Auto Services in Washington

Wind Tech Auto Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Windshield Repair
Address: Longmire
Phone: (206) 546-2971

Wind Tech Auto Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Windshield Repair
Address: Snoqualmie-Ps
Phone: (206) 546-2971

West Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 900 W Hills Blvd, Seabeck
Phone: (360) 377-4418

Volkswagen Audi Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 13551 SE 27th Pl # 112, Preston
Phone: (425) 453-6167

Village Transmission & Auto Clinic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Automobile Consultants
Address: 23901 84th Ave W, Woodway
Phone: (425) 908-0132

Villa Transmissions & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 9810 59th Ave SW, University-Place
Phone: (253) 584-1668

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Driving 2024 Chevy Traverse, BMW X5 M Competition, Fiat 500e | Autoblog Podcast #832

Fri, May 17 2024

In this episode of the Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Senior Editor John Beltz Snyder. John's been driving the new Chevy Traverse and the BMW X5 M Competition, and Greg gives his first impressions from behind the wheel of the new Fiat 500e. They discuss Tesla's abandonment of its lower-cost EV, and a report that it did so when the car was almost completed. They also discuss Subaru and Toyota teaming up again for another round of EVs, and discuss the ramifications of Biden's tariffs on China. Finally, they dig through the mailbag to give their opinions on the future of Rivian. Send us your questions for the Mailbag and Spend My Money at: Podcast@Autoblog.com. Autoblog Podcast #832 Get The Podcast Apple Podcasts – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes Spotify – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast on Spotify RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Cars we're driving: 2024 Chevrolet Traverse 2024 BMW X5 M Competition 2024 Fiat 500e Was the Tesla Model 2 almost finished when it was scrapped? The Information says so Subaru to lean on Toyota for three new EVs by 2026 President Biden hikes U.S. tariffs in Chinese chips and cars And why they could have little immediate impact Mailbag: Thoughts on Rivian's future Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on Apple Podcasts Autoblog is now live on your smart speakers and voice assistants with the audio Autoblog Daily Digest. Say “Hey Google, play the news from Autoblog” or "Alexa, open Autoblog" to get your favorite car website in audio form every day. A narrator will take you through the biggest stories or break down one of our comprehensive test drives. Related video: Government/Legal Green Podcasts BMW Chevrolet Fiat Subaru Tesla Crossover Hatchback SUV Electric Luxury Off-Road Vehicles Performance Rivian

Chevy says not to look at the 2019 Silverado's fuel economy rating

Tue, Nov 20 2018

The 2019 Chevy Silverado is hitting dealerships soon, and one of the most notable changes for the new full-size pickup is the addition of a 2.7-liter turbocharged inline-four. The engine replaces the naturally-aspirated 4.3-liter V6 in volume consumer models like the Silverado LT and promises more power, less weight and — most importantly — better fuel economy. The thing is, the gains in efficiency haven't been as dramatic as some might have hoped, especially when stacked up against competitors from Ford and Ram. As Automotive News reports, GM's response is a little murky. First, let's talk numbers. We're pulling all figures from FuelEconomy.gov, the official U.S. government source for fuel ratings. Fuel economy numbers on trucks vary greatly based on a number of factors. Bed and cab configuration play a part, but so does a four-wheel-drive system. You also have to factor in tires, transmissions, rear-axle gearing, hybrid systems and cylinder deactivation. Things like that can make the difference between best- and worst-in-class. The EPA's website doesn't give enough information a lot of the time, so there's really no easy way to compare apples-to-apples. First, take a look at the ratings for the 2019 Silverado. A 2.7-liter model with two-wheel drive is rated 20 city, 23 highway and 21 combined. That's both better and worse than a two-wheel drive 2018 Silverado with the 4.3-liter V6 (18 city, 24 highway and 20 combined). The updated 2019 Silverado with a 4.3-liter V6 has yet to be rated. With less weight and a smaller engine, many hoped Chevy would make bigger gains. It's unusual to see any decrease in a fuel economy metric these days. GM says that it's not done tuning the new 2.7-liter engine, so fuel economy could theoretically increase. Expanding further, a V8-powered 2019 Silverado (17 city, 24 highway and 19 combined) actually gets better highway fuel economy than a turbocharged four-cylinder powered truck in certain configurations, even if the latter has a better overall average. But that's only with two-wheel drive, the 8-speed transmission and cylinder deactivation. A Silverado with the 5.3-liter V8 and a 6-speed automatic is rated at 15 city, 22 highway and 17 combined. The biggest issue with the Silverado 2.7-liter doesn't come from within GM itself but from Ford and Ram. GM cites the Ford F-150 with the 3.3-liter V6 and the Ram 1500 with the 3.6-liter V6 as the closest competitors to its new 2.7-liter inline-four.