Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2001 Cadillac Deville Dhs Sedan 4-door 4.6l on 2040-cars

US $6,500.00
Year:2001 Mileage:87323
Location:

Painesville, Ohio, United States

Painesville, Ohio, United States
Advertising:

My Cadillac Deville DHS has been babied to the max, spends all winter in the garage, only has actual 87000 miles on her, she still drives like she just came off the showroom floor. Have only driven her about 20,000 over the past 5 years. She has every option imaginable, including Night Vision Cameras built into the front windshield so you can see even a cat running across the street in the black of night. I'm attaching all of the options it has from a car site I go on. Looking for an immediate sale, $7500.00 obo don't let this one get away. I HAVE SO MANY PICS BUT THEY ARE NOT UPLOADING, CONTACT ME AND I'LL SEND THEM TO YOU, NO BULL, NO SPAM, I AM NOT SENDING ANYTHING ANYWHERE AND NOT CASHING ANYBODY'S CHECKS, IT'S CASH BABY, THEY CALL ME CASH !!!!

2001 Cadillac DEVILLE DHS

Miles: 87,300
Engine: 8 Cyl Ext Color: CHAMPAGNE
Trans: Automatic Int Color: BEIGE/LEATHER
Drivetype: FWD
Body Style: Sedan Doors: 4
Passengers: 5 Price: $7500.00 OBO


*DHS* *DUAL POWER HEATED LEATHER SEATS!* DUAL POWER FULL MASSAGING FRONT LEATHER SEATS**FRONT WINSHIELD NIGHT VISION* * 8 Cyl * NEWER TIRES* -=* -=*!PRICED TO OWN!*=- *AWESOME VALUE* *ABSOLUTELY A MUST SEE!* *CLEAN INSIDE AND OUT!* *FULL POWER!


VALUED OPTIONS, FEATURES AND ACCESSORIES
• *LEATHER*
• Driver Air Bag
• Passenger Air Bag
• Power Windows
• Power Locks
• Power Driver Mirror
• Power Passenger Mirror
• Driver Heated Mirror
• Passenger Heated Mirror
• ABS Brake System
• *BACKUP SENSOR(s)*
• Low Fuel Light • Front Cup Holder(s)
• Rear Cup Holder(s)
• Security System
• Front Center Console
• Rear Center Console
• Vehicle Information Center
• Cruise Control
• *POWER DRIVER SEAT
• *POWER PASSENGER SEAT
• *DRIVER HEATED SEAT*
• *PASSENGER HEATED SEAT* • *DRIVER MEMORY SEAT*
• Tilt Steering Wheel
• Air Conditioning
• 1st Row Bucket Seat(s)
• 2nd Row Bench Seat(s)
• AMFM Radio/CD Player

Auto Services in Ohio

Yonkers Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 6 W Channel St, Millersport
Phone: (740) 366-1610

Western Reserve Battery Corp ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Battery Storage, Automobile Accessories
Address: 7580 Northfield Rd, Russell
Phone: (440) 439-7911

Walt`s Auto Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: 3551 Springfield Xenia Rd, Cedarville
Phone: (800) 325-7564

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 4607 Belden Village St NW, Robertsville
Phone: (330) 493-8462

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 675 N Houk Rd, Richwood
Phone: (740) 363-4080

Tritex Corporation ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery, Boat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 1390 Holly Ave, Kirkersville
Phone: (614) 294-8511

Auto blog

GM Recalling Another 2.7 Million Vehicles In Five Separate Campaigns

Thu, May 15 2014

The recalls keep rolling in from General Motors, evidently keen to avoid repeating the mistakes of the ignition-switch debacle and clean house. This time they're all coming at once, with five separate recalls announced together covering approximately 2.7 million vehicles. The largest of the five actions involves over 2.4 million units of the previous-generation Chevrolet Malibu and Malibu Maxx, Pontiac G6 and Saturn Aura in order to fix brake light wiring harness, which have been found to be susceptible to corrosion. The recall is separate from the 56k Aura sedans which GM recently recalled over faulty shift cables, not to mention the previous massive recall of 1.3 million vehicles – some of them the same models – but appears to have resulted from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigation that started with the G6 almost a year ago. The second-largest campaign involves the 2014 Chevy Malibu, specifically those fitted with GM's 2.5-liter engine and stop/start system, approximately 140,000 examples of which has been found to have problematic brakes. The issue does not appear to be connected to the recall of 8k Malibu and Buick LaCrosse sedans (also involving brake woes) which we reported upon last week. Four crashes have been reported in such models, but GM admits it's not yet clear if the problem was a contributing factor in the accidents. A further 112k Corvette models from the 2005-2007 model years are being called in for problems with their low-beam headlamps resulting from a flexing relay control circuit wire that's not meant to bend. GM says it is "aware of several hundred complaints" about this issue, but notes that there have been no reports of related accidents. In addition, over 19k examples of Cadillac CTS from the 2013 and 2014 model years are being recalled over windshield wipers that might not work after a jump start. Finally, GM is also bringing in 477 examples of its 2014 Chevy Silverado, Tahoe and GMC Sierra (though not the Yukon) to fix a problem with a tie rod in its steering rack. As ever, all recall repairs will be performed free of charge, and GM is now estimating that recall-related actions this quarter will result in an estimated $200-million charge against its second-quarter earnings. Read the full announcement from GM below for further details.

Cadillac CT4 Luggage Test | How much fits in the trunk?

Fri, Dec 4 2020

If you go by exterior specs, the Cadillac CT4 is more similar to a BMW 3 Series or Mercedes C-Class. However, if you go by interior space (or price), it's more like a Mercedes A-Class or BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe. That's definitely true of the trunk, which measures a rinky-dink 10.9 cubic feet, according to GM's specs. That number is what you'd expect in a small luxury coupe rather than a sedan. Indeed, the old ATS Coupe had 10.4 cubic feet.  Nevertheless, the CT4 is somehow not the smallest in the segment. That would be the A-Class and its 8.9-cubic-foot trunk. Good grief. Now, Mercedes has been known to shortchange its cargo capacity numbers so we'll have to luggage test that at some point to know for sure. Today, let's see if the CT4 is in keeping with that 10.9 number. Also, how much worse is it than the also rinky-dink CT5 trunk or the overly optimistic 2 Series Gran Coupe? Yep, that looks pretty small. Also, note the weird rail-like things that hampered the CT5 (below right) are also present here in the CT4 (below left). There's also a similar lip to clear for the folding back seat, but the CT4's opening seems bigger.  As in every luggage test I do, I use two midsize roller suitcases that would need to be checked in at the airport (26 inches long, 16 wide, 11 deep), two roll-aboard suitcases that just barely fit in the overhead (24L x 15W x 10D), and one smaller roll-aboard that fits easily (23L x 15W x 10D). I also include my wife's fancy overnight bag just to spruce things up a bit (21L x 12W x 12D). All but the biggest bag fit, which is exactly the same number that could fit in the CT5. As the below photo shows, the bigger car has just a bit more space left over. Maybe for a pair of grocery bags. That would be consistent with the difference in cubic feet: 11.9 cubic feet versus 10.9. What about the BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe? BMW says it has 15.1 cubic feet of space, but it doesn't. At least not using the same measurement criteria that the vast majority of other manufacturers use. It can carry the biggest bag, but it would still need to leave the fancy bag behind. That's also while utilizing the 2 GC's ample under-floor storage compartment.  As such, the CT4 does indeed have a small trunk, but it's at least in keeping with its competitors. The CT5 cannot say that, regardless of which segment you compare it to.  Unfortunately for the CT4, though, the story does not stop here.

GM says safety is a reason it's dropping Apple CarPlay, Android Auto

Tue, Dec 12 2023

Update: GM sent us a statement as a follow-up to its original comments seen in this post: "We wanted to reach out to clarify that comments about GM's position on phone projection were misrepresented in previous articles and to reinforce our valued partnerships with Apple and Google and each company’s commitment to driver safety. GM's embedded infotainment strategy is driven by the benefits of having a system that allows for greater integration with the larger GM ecosystem and vehicles." The original story can be read in its entirety below.   General Motors announced its intention to remove Apple CarPlay and Android Auto functionality from its upcoming EVs earlier this year, and internet comments sections haven't been kind since. As the first of many EVs to follow – the 2024 Chevrolet Blazer EV – hits the market, GM is expanding on its initial explanations for dropping the tech. Motor Trend spoke with Tim Babbit, GMÂ’s head of product for infotainment, to learn more. Attributed to Babbit, from the story: “They have stability issues that manifest themselves as bad connections, poor rendering, slow responses, and dropped connections. And when CarPlay and Android Auto have issues, drivers pick up their phones again, taking their eyes off the road and totally defeating the purpose of these phone-mirroring programs. Solving those issues can sometimes be beyond the control of the automaker.” Babbit suggests that a world without Apple CarPlay or Android Auto will be a safer one, as folks wonÂ’t be looking to control their infotainment systems via their phones. However, Babbit also tells MT that this theory hasnÂ’t been tested in either the lab or the real world yet. Instead of using a navigation or music-playing app powered through your phone, upcoming GM EVs will use a Google-based infotainment system called “Ultifi” that runs a ton of integrated Google apps. Google Maps will be the native navigation app in the system; youÂ’ll be able to log in to Spotify or other apps to load your music up, and so on. The idea here is that youÂ’ll have all the same apps that were on your phone available but integrated within the infotainment system instead, and you'll be able to use voice controls to control every last bit of it with no need to reach for a phone. That sounds amenable in theory, but how consumers react to the removal of a feature that they know and love now is a risky gamble.