1968 Buick Gs350 In Excellent Original Shape Daily Summer Driver Head Turner on 2040-cars
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Engine:V8
Body Type:Muscle car
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:High Octane Gasoline only
For Sale By:Owner
Exterior Color: Original Bamboo cream yellow
Make: Buick
Interior Color: Platinum Green
Model: Skylark
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: GS350
Drive Type: Automatic centre consol
Mileage: 125,000
Sub Model: GS350
This is a very rare, all original three times painted yellow and red stripe GS350 with rear weight levelling shocks to give it a nicer look. Peppy!! Drives very well and will keep up with the best. The only down fall is that she is going to set you back a little on gas! High Octane is all it would take or it will let you know. She is all original 4 barrel chrome carb cover and the heart is a V8 small block with matching number turbo 2 speed tranny. Tires are new and so is the vinyl top. The paint is new and only 6 month old. Little bondo and fiberglass, the quarter panels have been replaced with steel quarter panels welded on with brass rods. The rust spots have all be repaired with welds and will last until the next rotisserie years from now. I enjoyed this car all summer and its time to make room for my next project. I have looked after this GS350 for 8 years and now its time to let it go. There hasn't been a day that someone has not seen me drive it and not say 'nice car'.
Buick Skylark for Sale
California car, original classic, low original miles, excellent condition.(US $12,900.00)
1970 buick gs stage 1 gm prototype show car 1 of 1 investment grade collector(US $89,900.00)
1968 buick skylark custom 350/4bbl th400 42,600 original miles
1964 buick skylark(US $15,000.00)
1969 buick skylark custom 2-door hardtop 39,000 original documented miles l@@k !(US $12,900.00)
1968 buick skylark custom convertible(US $19,999.00)
Auto blog
Buick asks design students 'What could a Buick sedan look like in 2030?'
Mon, 09 Jun 2014When you think of daring concept cars or emotional design-student projects, Buick probably isn't the first brand that comes to mind. It's not for lack of concepts; when General Motors ran down 11 concept-car highlights from Buick's 110-year history, three of them are from the past 15 years, with other experiments in that same timeframe like the Black Hawk, Centieme and Cielo left unmentioned.
But the company still thinks about them even if we don't. It ran a contest for students at Detroit's College for Creative Studies to create a Buick for the year 2030 that would incorporate future materials and transportation needs, and nanotechnology.
Best exterior design went to Sam Kenny for his Neo Classical Buick, Justin Salmon took honors for innovative material use, like having exposed algae on the bodyshell to generate energy, and Namsuk Lee nabbed best overall concept and best interior for his Buick Vision Sedan. You can read more about the design challenge and winners in the press release, and hear students talk about what went into the work in the video below.
The importance of Angel Eyes, Ventiports and four round taillights
Sun, 01 Sep 2013Just the other day, we told you about how Lincoln isn't really a luxury brand, according to Ford's head design man, J Mays. His argument was that Lincoln lacked the unique DNA to differentiate it from the rest of the market, although the arrival of the MKZ is beginning to change that. Now, we have this video from Autoline Detroit, where Jim Hall, an analyst for 2953 Analytics who was quoted in yesterday's Lincoln story, explains the influence of certain styling cues and how they impact the brands.
Using BMW (Angel Eyes) and Buick (Ventiports) as examples for small, simple touches that serve to distinguish the brand's vehicles on the road, Hall then points out how changing trademark styling features, as Chevrolet has done on the new Corvette Stingray, can hurt the vehicle's public perception. Take a look at the full video below for an interesting dive into what these styling features mean to their individual brands.
10 of 18 midsize SUVs earn 'good' IIHS side impact safety rating
Wed, May 18 2022It's not terribly surprising that midsize SUVs earned better safety ratings than small SUVs in the latest side-impact tests performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Just how much better they scored, on the other hand, certainly raises an eyebrow. Ten out of 18 midsize SUVs earned the highest rating of 'good' in the stringent new test, altered for vehicles starting with the 2020 model year with a heavier barrier (4,200 pounds) that moves at a higher speed (37 miles per hour) and is fitted with a hard honeycomb frontal structure. By way of contrast, just one out of of 20 small SUVs earned a 'good' score. SUVs that receiving 'good' scores were the Ford Explorer, Infiniti QX60, Lincoln Aviator, Mazda CX-9, Nissan Pathfinder, Subaru Ascent, Toyota Highlander, Volkswagen Atlas, Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport and Volkswagen ID.4. For EV fans, it's worth noting the ID.4 was the only electric vehicle included in the test. The Buick Enclave and Chevrolet Traverse scraped away with 'acceptable' ratings while the Honda Passport, Honda Pilot, Hyundai Palisade, Jeep Wrangler 4-door, Kia Telluride and Nissan Murano were deemed merely 'marginal' in the tough new test. Only two models — the Mazda CX-9 and Volkswagen ID.4 — earned a "Good" rating in every test category. Interestingly, the Jeep Wrangler would have scored a 'good' rating if it were equipped with side airbags for the rear seating positions. It would likely be an engineering challenge to equip its removable top and/or doors with airbags, but the lack of that safety feature allowed the head of the rear passenger dummy to hit the vertical support of the top. Otherwise, the Wrangler scored good ratings across the board. The new Ford Bronco, which makes more allowances for side-impact safety, has not yet been tested. The popular Hyundai Palisade and Kia Telluride SUVs stand out in the test with 'poor' ratings for driver pelvis injuries. The Nissan Murano, a vehicle last redesigned for the 2015 model year, was the only vehicle tested that received a 'poor' rating for its structure and safety cage. Videos of the tests of 12 of these 18 SUVs can be found on the IIHS' YouTube page. Related video: Green Buick Chevrolet Ford Honda Hyundai Infiniti Jeep Kia Mazda Nissan Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Safety Crossover SUV IIHS Insurance Institute for Highway Safety


