Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

07 Audi S4 Convertible Leather Automatic Awd Clean Car Fax 58k Miles on 2040-cars

Year:2007 Mileage:58528 Color: Dolphin Gray Metallic
Location:

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Advertising:

Auto Services in Arizona

Your Automotive Solution ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Engine Rebuilding
Address: 521 S Gilbert Rd, Queen-Creek
Phone: (480) 890-3080

White`s Integrity Auto Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 5655 S Power Rd, Apache-Jct
Phone: (480) 988-5180

Wheeler Glass Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Shower Doors & Enclosures
Address: 7211 E Southern Ave # 101, Apache-Jct
Phone: (480) 497-9400

Tucson Independant Muffler Super Car Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 2327 S Craycroft Rd, Oro-Valley
Phone: (520) 790-8716

TechPlus Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 7333 E Butherus Dr Ste.B200, Glendale-Luke-Afb
Phone: (480) 207-3158

Super Discount Transmissions ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
Address: Peridot
Phone: (602) 273-6431

Auto blog

Audi RS6 Avant and Mercedes-AMG E63 S drag race for Top Gear

Thu, Apr 14 2016

Sometimes the kids are late for school, and you need a wagon to get them there in a hurry. In its latest drag race, Top Gear finds out which is the quicker high-performance family hauler: the Audi RS6 Avant or the Mercedes-AMG E63 S. The specs suggest this race should be quite close at the finish line. The RS6 has a 4.0-liter twin-turbo V8 with 552 horsepower, but the E63 S is a little more powerful with 577 hp from a 5.5-liter twin-turbo V8. However, the Audi has a traction advantage from the all-wheel drive system, whereas the Mercedes only spins its rear wheels. Pick your favorite, and then watch the video to see if the similar numbers translate to a photo finish in the real world. Related Video:

Ward's reveals annual 10 Best Engines list for 2013

Thu, 13 Dec 2012

Ward's Auto has released its annual 10 Best Engines award winners. The 2013 list covers the full width and breadth of the internal combustion spectrum, from a spate of efficient four-cylinders to the most powerful production V8 on the planet. As always, the entries must be available in a production vehicle in the first quarter of 2013 with an MSRP of less than $55,000. The supercharged 3.0-liter V6 from the Audi S5 held on for the fourth consecutive year, and BMW earned two spots on the list with its turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder and turbo 3.0-liter inline-six.
Ford pulled in two awards for its 2.0-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder and and the supercharged 5.8-liter V8 from the Shelby GT500. Honda matched BMW and Ford with two wins of its own. Wards awarded the 2.4-liter four-cylinder from the Honda Accord Sport as well as the 3.5-liter V6 from the Honda Accord. Chrysler, General Motors and Subaru each garnered a spot on the list as well for the 3.6-liter V6 in the Ram 1500, the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the Cadillac ATS and the 2.0-liter four-cylinder the Subaru BRZ, respectively. You can read the full press release below for more information.

2015 Audi Q3

Mon, Apr 13 2015

There are two ways to approach a brand-new segment in the auto industry. First, an automaker can take a gamble and introduce a completely new vehicle, catering to the specific demands of the marketplace(s) in question. In the compact, premium CUV segment, we've seen Buick do this with the Encore, and Mercedes-Benz with the GLA-Class. The other option is to introduce a vehicle already sold in another market. Considering the amount of time it takes to bring a new vehicle from paper to production, there is plenty to gain in the short-term with this approach. It's not without its downsides, though, as we found after a week behind the wheel of the 2015 Audi Q3, a vehicle that was initially launched in 2011. Cute though it may be – it was referred to at least once by a passerby during our testing as "totes adorbs" – Ingolstadt's decision to introduce a vehicle that's already been on sale for four years, and is effectively approaching the last half of its lifecycle, leaves the Q3 at a significant disadvantage relative to the newer competition. Despite crossing its first auto show stage four years ago, the Q3 remains a handsome little bugger. Audi's designs, while conservative, tend to age very well, and the compact Q3 is no exception. It's like a scaled-down Q5 in most respects, although certain design pieces, like its more aggressively raked rear window and shorter front and rear overhangs, belie the significantly smaller Q3's figure. Due to its age, the Q3 was, fortunately, designed before the current A3 hit the market. That means it avoids the unattractive, minimalist dash of the A3, opting for a more traditional Audi design, with a strip of brushed aluminum on the passenger's side, a user-friendly center stack and a suitably large nav screen front and center. While the overall layout is attractive, the material quality is not what we'd expect of a newer Audi. There's nothing that feels exceedingly cheap – the plastics just feel old and too familiar. It's difficult to describe, but as soon as you climb in the Q3, things like the switchgear for the HVAC controls immediately remind you that this is a vehicle that's been on sale since 2011. While our definition of interior quality has evolved over the years, our idea of a driver-friendly cabin has not. The Q3 scores highly in this regard, featuring the elevated seating position that makes CUVs so popular with the general public.