2013(13)a4 2.0t Quattro Fact W-ty Only 6k Lthr Heat Sts Xenon Moon Phone Mp3 Sat on 2040-cars
Bedford, Ohio, United States
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:2.0L 1984CC 121Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Turbocharged
Body Type:Sedan
Fuel Type:GAS
Transmission:Automatic
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Make: Audi
Model: A4 Quattro
Options: Leather
Trim: Base Sedan 4-Door
Doors: 4
Drive Type: AWD
Engine Description: 2.0L L4 FI DOHC 16V TURBO
Mileage: 6,045
Number of Doors: 4
Sub Model: 4dr Sdn Auto quattro 2.0T Premium Plus
Exterior Color: White
Number of Cylinders: 4
Interior Color: Black
Audi A4 for Sale
2002 blue audi a4 quattro 4 door 3.0l
2008 audi a4 quattro excellent condition
2008 audi a4 base sedan 4-door 2.0l(US $16,500.00)
2008 audi a4 quattro base sedan 4-door 2.0l - 42k miles! no reserve!
2003 audi a4 low miles convertable perfect color combo whole sale pricing.(US $9,995.00)
11 a4 2.0t-15k-premium-awd-bluetooth-heated seats-leather(US $25,995.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
Xenia Radiator & Auto Service ★★★★★
West Main Auto Repair ★★★★★
Top Knotch Automotive ★★★★★
Tom Hatem Automotive ★★★★★
Stanford Allen Chevrolet Cadillac ★★★★★
Soft Touch Car Wash Systems ★★★★★
Auto blog
Audi, Jag, Kia and Tesla top Strategic Vision 2014 Total Quality Index
Sun, 06 Jul 2014A couple weeks ago, J.D. Power released its latest Initial Quality Study, which gave high marks to Porsche, Hyundai and General Motors, with the latter earning more individual IQS awards than any other manufacturer. Now, it's Strategic Vision's turn, and it's doling out its praise not to Porsche, but to Tesla, which wasn't even included in the JD Power IQS.
The Model S was named the best vehicle overall in total quality, while Porsche's corporate brother and endurance-racing rival, Audi, was named the best premium brand, alongside Jaguar. Strategic Vision cited the Q5 and the ancient Q7 for individual segment awards, as well as the A5, which was a mere point off the top of its segment. SV also handed out compliments for the Audi's interior work. The win for the German brand is a nice improvement over its IQS score, with which it landed above the industry average, but solidly mid-pack.
Jaguar was without a segment winner, although SV did say that the Indian-owned English brand had a number of vehicles very near the top of their segments. This is the second significant win for Jag in two weeks, after it finished second overall on the JD Power IQS a few weeks ago.
Looking for meaning in Audi killing off its $1m electric supercar
Thu, Oct 20 2016Audi's most ambitious - well, most expensive, anyway – electric vehicle is no more. After building fewer than 100 of them (perhaps a lot fewer), Audi has cancelled the R8 E-Tron. Maybe it was the million-dollar-plus price tag. Maybe it was the " supreme hand-built quality." Maybe it was the fact that a non-electric R8 could be had for $164,150. Whatever the reason, was killing the R8 E-Tron a good idea? The R8 E-Tron would have been a good halo vehicle for the brand Here's the case for this being a shortsighted move. As we all know, the VW Group – and Audi especially – is in the middle of an electrification kick, and the R8 E-Tron would have been a good halo vehicle for the brand. Instead, it can stand as a prime example of waffling on the promise of plug-in vehicles. After all, Audi used to be incredibly proud of the R8 E-Tron, even if it had a tough history. The whole program was an on-again/ off-again kind of thing, but with enough momentum to get the EV some time at the Nurburgring. With both Mercedes and the EQ brand and BMW with its i brand moving strong into EVs, letting the headline be "Audi killed an EV" is not exactly fitting. It's not like Audi was wasting time making a lot of these. The R8 E-Tron went on sale in 2015 to customers who made a special request for it, and apparently only 100 did. But let's stop there. Getting 100 people to plunk down a million dollars or so for a car totals up to be a lot of money. There's no reason for Audi to price the car this high (forerunner vehicle programs almost always lose money for a time, just ask Toyota RE the Prius), but it did. And $100 million (if almost 100 were indeed sold) is nothing to scoff at, is it? It obviously wasn't enough to keep the lines and tooling open for this limited vehicle, and that sort of opens up a bigger question. Does the end (the second end, really) of the R8 E-Tron say something more important about EVs? Are they becoming less exotic high-end fixtures and more everyday transport? In a world full of Bolts and Ioniqs and E-Golfs – so, the world of 2017 and beyond – does a super high-end EV have any meaning? Gas-powered cars have managed to pull this off for decades, with Lamborghinis and Maseratis surviving just fine even with millions of Corollas out there. In a more-developed EV ecosystem, expensive EVs like the R8 should be able to do the same. Just not right now.
Weekly Recap: The divergent paths of Tesla and Fisker
Sat, 02 Aug 2014
There's no doubt that Tesla is downshifting while Fisker has been grinding its gears. But it wasn't always that way.
In the wake of Tesla's recent success, it's easy to forget that there were once two California electric carmakers with bright futures.
