Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2008 Acura Tl Type-s Loaded on 2040-cars

US $19,300.00
Year:2008 Mileage:66720 Color: /interior
Location:

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Advertising:

*****FOR ADDITIONAL PICTURES, PLEASE CONTACT ME*****

2008 Acura TL Type-S, 66,XXX miles. 
Carbon Bronze Metallic Exterior with 2 Tone Black/Bronze Interior. 
Comes with every option, including navigation, sunroof, heated seats and mirrors, bluetooth, Back up camera etc. 
Automatic with Paddle Shifters. 
Clean Title, and all maintenance records are available. I am the second owner. I bought the car with 40K miles. Since then, I have all service records and 50K mile service has been done. 
The car is complete with no issues. Serpentine belt was replaced a 2000 miles ago. Most recent service was done last week, $1000 to service the transmission, new radiator and its components, New Battery. Tires are in good condition. Car is in great mechanical shape.

Was involved in one minor parking lot accident. Nothing major, frame was not bent. Total estimate damage was less than 2000 including labor. Front Bumper and right headlight was replaced. 

I have a Weapon-R intake installed, and the resonator has been removed. All the interior lights have been changed to led bulbs. All mods can be replaced to stock if requested.

Car Comes with a 5th TL-S Special Edition WEB Rim also. 

Asking 19700 O.B.O, Serious offers only. If you are looking for this car, then you know what the car is worth and that it holds its value. 

You can compare my price to KBB Private Party Value

Auto Services in Massachusetts

Westgate Tire & Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 98 Westgate Dr, Monponsett
Phone: (888) 603-6146

Stewie`s Tire & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 641 N Main St, South-Weymouth
Phone: (781) 963-7856

School Street Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange, Auto Engine Rebuilding
Address: 27 School St, Waban
Phone: (978) 263-7393

Saugus Auto-Craft ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 79 Bennett St, Lynnfield
Phone: (781) 780-2040

Raffia Road Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Auto Transmission
Address: 105 Raffia Rd, E-Longmeadow
Phone: (860) 749-0584

Quality Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 76 Ramah Cir N, West-Whately
Phone: (413) 789-3500

Auto blog

Next-gen Acura TLX spied out testing in heavy camouflage

Wed, Aug 14 2019

We’re sure you all remember that stunning Acura Type S Concept from yesterday. Acura said itÂ’s meant to influence the next-gen TLXÂ’s design, and lo and behold, here is the next-gen TLX. Of course, Acura has no intentions of letting us see the production car anytime soon, so weÂ’re treated to a heavily cladded prototype in the photos here. Looking at it in profile, the camouflaged car looks a whole lot like the Type S Concept we saw yesterday. The short rear overhang is similar, but the front of the production car looks like it hangs out over the front wheels a little further – it still shares the concept's overall long-hood/short-deck proportions, though. The roof tapers down into the decklid at a shallow angle, similar to the concept car. WeÂ’re sad to see the same quad exhaust isnÂ’t protruding from the rear bumper of this tester. Instead, it gets a dual exhaust with wide, rectangular outlets on both sides. We think the car weÂ’re looking at here is likely a regular TLX, and not the spicy Type S variant most likely seen last year. ThereÂ’s one interior photo our shooter was able to snag, showing a similar infotainment screen as that used in the new RDX, something we fully expect for the production car. That touchpad system is far superior to Acura infotainment systems of the past, but it still isnÂ’t perfect. An analog tachometer is visible off to the left, indicating that the regular TLX trims probably won't introduce a fully digital instrument cluster. Not that we'd expect that; even the new RDX maintains analog gauges in its top spec. However the TLX story plays out, it wonÂ’t hurt if the production car looks just like the well-received Type S Concept. ItÂ’s unclear how long weÂ’ll have to wait to see the car in full, but we'll keep you posted.

Kia leads J.D. Power's Vehicle Dependability Study for 2022

Thu, Feb 10 2022

For the first year ever, Kia leads J.D. Power's annual Vehicle Dependability Study with a score of 145 problems per 100 vehicles. Buick (147) and Hyundai (148) round out the top three. The highest premium brand on the list is Genesis, with a score of 148. It's common for so-called "mass market" brands to lead this particular study, according to J.D. Power, as "premium" brands "typically incorporate more technology in their vehicles, which increases the likelihood for problems to occur" and aren't necessarily built to a higher standard that less-expensive brands. The highest-rated single nameplate is the Porsche 911. It's the third time out of the past four years and the second year in a row that Porsche's quintessential sports car has taken top honors. Porsche as a brand sits in seventh place (162) just behind Lexus (159) and ahead of Dodge (166). At the very bottom of the list is Land Rover with a dismal score of 284; the SUV specialist held the same unfortunate distinction on last year's list. Ram (266), Volvo (256), Alfa Romeo (245) and Acura (244) also performed poorly. The overall industry average score sits at 192 — mass market brands average a score of 190 while premium brands sit 14 points lower at 204. While Tesla is unofficially included in some of J.D. Power's results, the agency says the sample size it has access to for this study is too small to include. As has been the case for the past several years, infotainment systems dominate the list of problems reported by owners. Popular (or unpopular, depending on your point of view) complaints include built-in voice recognition (8.3 PP100), Android Auto/Apple CarPlay connectivity (5.4 PP100), built-in Bluetooth system (4.5 PP100), not enough power plugs/USB ports (4.2 PP100), navigation systems difficult to understand/use (3.7 PP100), touchscreen/display screen (3.6 PP100), and navigation system inaccurate/outdated map (3.6 PP100). While problems with the car's infotainment and technology packages are indeed bothersome, it's important to remember that such issues aren't usually leaving owners stranded with an immovable vehicle like a broken transmission or blown engine would. Culling infotainment complaints from the results would reduce the average problem-per-100-vehicle score by a staggering 51.9 points. The vehicles included in this study are from the 2019 model year. That means owners have had three years to get to know their cars and trucks. It's the 33rd year that J.D.

Vehicles awarded IIHS Top Safety Pick awards skyrockets for 2015 [w/video]

Wed, Dec 24 2014

By practically every measure, passenger vehicles in the US are continuing to get safer. With the year rapidly coming to an end, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is releasing its annual list tallying of the scores for the latest vehicles to see how they compare to last year. Judging by the agency's evaluations, the numbers look quite positive. According to the institute, 71 vehicles earned either the Top Safety Pick or Top Safety Pick+ rating so far in its testing for 2015. Among the latest winners, there have been 33 TSP+ awards and 38 TSP medalists. That's a healthy increase over the 22 TSP+ and 17 TSP grades in 2014. The figures appear even more impressive when you consider that it keeps getting harder to earn the + designation. In the latest round of testing, a vehicle must offer some form of front crash prevention automatic braking to get the mark. Previously, just a warning to drivers was necessary. This list also illustrates the ways that automakers adapt to new testing procedures. In 2013 there were 117 TSP ratings and 13 TSP+ awards. Then, the IIHS mandated that to be a safety pick, a model had to score Good in the institute's four crash tests, plus a Good or Acceptable in the small overlap front test. That brought a plunge in 2014 to just 17 TSP grades. With the numbers climbing again, companies apparently have deciphered how to perform better. Some brands especially stood out on this year's list. The IIHS praised Volvo, Mercedes-Benz and Acura for offering standard front crash prevention systems on some models. Subaru received at least one of the awards for all seven of its models. Toyota also had seven, and the Honda brand did too – though the institute counts the two- and four-door versions of the Civic and Accord separately. Check out the full announcement below and a video about this year's winners. The full list can be viewed, here. Safety gains ground: More vehicles earn top honors from IIHS The number of vehicles earning either of the Institute's two awards has jumped to 71 from 39 this time last year, giving consumers more choices for optimum protection in crashes. The number of winners in the top tier - TOP SAFETY PICK+ - has increased by 11 for 2015, despite a tougher standard for front crash prevention. "This is the third year in a row that we are giving automakers a tougher challenge to meet," says IIHS President Adrian Lund.