Volvo S40 T5 on 2040-cars
Los Angeles, California, United States
Hello! Up for sale is my 2005 Volvo S40 T5. The car runs perfectly and will do so for years to come. As is always the case with Volvo, safety is paramount, so rest assured that even the newest of drivers will be safe behind the wheel! The car has 70,600 miles on it and looks brand new inside and out. No accidents whatsoever. Never been smoked in. All maintenance was done at my local Volvo dealer until the last oil change, which I did myself I bought the car in '08 straight off of lease with the CPO warranty. Under warranty, I had the PCV system replaced, the AC compressor replaced and the entire starter system replaced (not sure why they thought replacing the whole system was the way to go... but it wasn't my money!) Factory options were: Electric Silver Paint / Dark Gray Leather Interior Geartronic Transmission Factory Sport Body Kit with Rear Spoiler Xenon Headlamps Heated Seats Premium Audio with 6 Disc Changer OEM Sport Suspension All of the modifications done to the car were done by a local shop in Redondo Beach. I understand that there are a lot of parts on here, but I have most of the stock parts that can be included with the sale if the buyer would like to return anything to stock. For those interested, the modifications are: K&N Typhoon Intake, Custom 3" High Flow Turbo Downpipe, Custom 3" Magnaflow Cat Back, Evolve 25mm Sway Bar, Eurosport Tuning Strut Brace, Evolve FMIC, HD Turbo Control Valve from IPD, RICA Tuning ECU Software (91 Octane, CARB legal), ELEVATE Intake Plenum, VibraTechnics Lower Engine Mount, Forge Diverter Valve with High Boost Spring, Eibach Pro Kit (Lowering Coils), Koni Yellow Sport Shocks/Strust (Installed less than 500 miles ago), Elevate Slotted Rotors (F/R), PosiQuiet Ceramic Brake Pads, OEM Sport Pedals, OEM Sport Aluminum Shift Knob, OEM Sport Aluminum Steering Wheel, Evolve Dead Pedal, OEM Volvo Subwoofer, Volvo Garmin Dash Mounted Navigation, Full Tint, Color Matched Headlight Eyebrows by Individual, Color Matched Rear Widow Spoiler, HID Fog Light Conversion, Tinted Taillights, Evolve M10's (19x8.5 all around) Given the condition of the car and the care that I've put into it, $15k would be ideal, but I'm open to hear offers! Shipping will be on the buyer, but I can bring the car somewhere local for loading if that would help. Thanks for looking! |
Volvo S40 for Sale
2007 s40,2.4l, power moonroof, leather, 99k miles,we finance(US $9,950.00)
2008 volvo s40 2.4i automatic cruise ctrl cd audio 69k texas direct auto(US $11,980.00)
No reserve nr high bidder wins !!!
Volvo s40 great condition 4 cyl turbo 102k miles
2004 volvo s40 t5 sedan 4-door 2.5l
2004 1/2 volvo s40
Auto Services in California
Yuki Import Service ★★★★★
Your Car Specialists ★★★★★
Xpress Auto Service ★★★★★
Xpress Auto Leasing & Sales ★★★★★
Wynns Motors ★★★★★
Wright & Knight Service Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E, Volvo XC40 Recharge score high in IIHS tests
Thu, Apr 22 2021New electric cars continue their streak of impressive crash test results. The two latest to go through Insurance Institute for Highway Safety testing are the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E and the 2021 Volvo XC40 Recharge. The former earned a Top Safety Pick award, and the latter picked up the Top Safety Pick+ commendation. Both vehicles got the top "Good" rating in every crash test, as well as the "Superior" rating for vehicle-to-vehicle collision prevention. They deviate when it comes to headlights and vehicle-to-pedestrian collision prevention. Because the Volvo has headlights rated "Good" on all trims, it got that extra "+" on its Top Safety Pick award. The Ford also has high-rated headlights available, but the standard units got the second lowest rating of "Marginal." As for the vehicle-to-pedestrian collision prevention, the Volvo received the second-highest "Advanced" rating, while the Ford was rated "Superior." Among the electric cars IIHS has tested, the Ford and Volvo continue a streak of high scores. The organization has evaluated the Audi E-Tron in both its body styles, as well as the Tesla Model 3, both of which get the Top Safety Pick+ rating. As a result of the XC40 Recharge's test score, Volvo pointed out that it is the only automaker whose entire lineup has received a Top Safety Pick+ rating. Related video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Â
Junkyard Gem: 1983 Volvo 240 DL Sedan
Sat, Nov 6 2021The most iconic of all the Volvos — all the Swedish cars, for that matter — sold in the United States is and always will be the brick-shaped 200 series, which could be purchased new here from the 1975 model year all the way through 1993. Though it was an evolution of the earlier 140 series and looked nearly identical to its ancestor from any rear angle, the 240 (and, to a much lesser extent, 260) remains the most recognizable Volvo ever made. Because these cars were quite sturdy and inspired such devotion from their owners, plenty of them remain on the road to this dayÂ… and that means plenty of them wear out every year and end up taking that final tow-truck ride to the boneyard. Here's a bread-and-butter mid-1980s 244, with the sensible four-on-the-floor overdrive manual transmission and well-oxidized Richelieu Red paint, found in a self-service yard near Denver, Colorado. Prior to the 1980 model year, U.S.-market Volvo 200s were named according to a very logical system: the model name was a three-digit number, with the first digit indicating the car series, the second digit representing the number of engine cylinders, and the third digit showing the number of doors. Typically, the trim level would come after that. Just to confuse everyone, Volvo did away with everything but the trim levels when identifying these cars. Thus, this car would have been badged as a 244 DL during the 1975-1979 period, but for the first half of the 1980s it was called simply the Volvo DL. Of course, everyone who knows old Volvos today just calls this a 244, period. DL stood for Deluxe, so of course it was the cheapest trim level. The list price on this car started at $11,085, or about $31,090 in 2021 dollars. That was cheaper than a new BMW 320i ($13,290 or $37,275 now), but more expensive than more luxurious and powerful Japanese competitors such as the Datsun 810 Maxima by Nissan ($10,869 or $30,485 today) and Mazda 626 Luxury Sedan ($8,895 or $24,950 today). If you insisted on an automatic transmission in your '83 DL sedan, the price tag went up an additional 390 bucks, or about $1,094 now. This car has the base four-speed manual with the overdrive actuated by a switch on the shift knob. With 107 horsepower from this 2.3-liter straight-four engine, this car wasn't particularly quick. However, it weighed less than 3,000 pounds (despite its blocky appearance), so it got out of its own way well enough when equipped with a manual transmission.
Jaguar turns down offers to join V8 Supercars, questions AMG, Volvo participation
Thu, 27 Jun 2013Rumors have swirled in recent weeks that Jaguar may be the next manufacturer to join the V8 Supercars racing series, made popular in Australia but now well-known in other parts of the world as well. Sadly, Jag's participation is not to be. In fact, it would be "insane," according to Jaguar Land Rover Asia Pacific Managing Director David Blackhall, for it to accept either of the two offers it has received to bring Jaguar into V8 Supercars.
Not only is Jaguar not interested in entering V8 Supercars, says Blackhall, it also fails to understand the recent entries from AMG and Volvo. "I don't know what it does for AMG to get flogged by a V8 Commodore week after week, but it's their brand, their issue. And the same thing will happen to Volvo to be honest."
Judging by Blackhall's statements to motoring.com.au, after not-so-serious consideration, the automaker decided the monetary commitment it would take to compete for wins would be more than any potential exposure would be worth, despite the fact that Jaguar has a 5.0-liter V8 to go along with what would seem to be a tailor-made rear-wheel-drive chassis. For what it's worth, one offer would have had Jaguar putting its name across an engine made by someone else, an option that was flatly turned down.