Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1.5 Engine 5speed Manual Hard To Find on 2040-cars

US $5,900.00
Year:2008 Mileage:80600
Location:

Tampa, Florida, United States

Tampa, Florida, United States
Advertising:

Air Conditioning and Dual front impact airbags.BLUE! What are you waiting for?! Our no hassle, no games pricing policy means that you receive the lowest internet live market price on every vehicle, every day, Who could say no to a simply outstanding car like this good-looking 2008 Toyota Yaris? Climb into this terrific Toyota Yaris, knowing that it will always get you where you need to go, on time, every time. All prices plus sales tax, tag and titling, No dealer fees which represents cost and profits to the selling dealer for items such as cleaning, inspecting, adjusting new vehicles and preparing documents related to the sale but we dont charge it
Bank repo vehicle 

car details
1.5 engine 5 speed manual transmission
2drs,cold a/c
angel head lights 

kelly blue book value $7400.00

GROUP SERVICES ENTERPRISES LLC
4301 N FLORIDA AVENUE
TAMPA,FL 33603

FLORIDA RESIDENTS PAYS FLORIDA TAXES

Auto Services in Florida

Xtreme Car Installation ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 3663 NW 79th St, Virginia-Gardens
Phone: (305) 836-0118

White Ford Company Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 916 N Young Blvd, Cedar-Key
Phone: (352) 493-4297

Wheel Innovations & Wheel Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels, Hub Caps
Address: 5920 University Blvd W, Saint-Augustine
Phone: (904) 731-0867

West Orange Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 917 W Oakland Ave, Hiawassee
Phone: (407) 877-2886

Wally`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: Buena-Ventura-Lakes
Phone: (352) 357-0576

VIP Car Wash ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Car Wash, Automobile Detailing
Address: 5910 S Military Trl, Cloud-Lake
Phone: (561) 965-6000

Auto blog

Is 120 miles just about perfect for EV range?

Tue, Apr 15 2014

When it comes to battery-electric vehicles, our friend Brad Berman over at Plug In Cars says 40 miles makes all the difference in the world. That's the approximate difference in single-charge range between the battery-electric version of the Toyota RAV4 and the Nissan Leaf. It's also the difference between the appearance or disappearance of range anxiety. The 50-percent battery increase has zapped any lingering range anxiety, Berman writes. The RAV4 EV possesses a 40-kilowatt-hour pack, compared to the 24-kWh pack in the Leaf. After factoring in differences in size, weight and other issues, that means the compact SUV gets about 120 miles on a single charge in realistic driving conditions, compared to about 80 miles in the Leaf. "The 50 percent increase in battery size from Leaf to RAV has zapped any lingering range anxiety," Berman writes. His observations further feed the notion that drivers need substantial backup juice in order to feel comfortable driving EVs. Late last year, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), along with the Consumers Union estimated that about 42 percent of US households could drive plug-in vehicles with "little or no change" in their driving habits, and that almost 70 percent of US commuters drive fewer than 60 miles per weekday. That would imply that a substantial swath of the country should be comfortable using a car like the Leaf as their daily driver - with first-quarter Leaf sales jumping 46 percent from a year before, more Americans certainly are. Still, the implication here is that EV sales will continue to be on the margins until an automaker steps up battery capabilities to 120 or so miles while keeping the price in the $30,000 range. Think that's a reasonable goal to shoot for?

IIHS: Drivers safer than passengers in frontal crash test

Thu, Jun 23 2016

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced a small overlap frontal crash test in 2012 that replicates what happens when the front corner of a car impacts another object. In the test, vehicles travel at a speed of 40 mph toward a five-foot-tall barrier with 25 percent of the total width of the car striking the barrier on the driver side. One would assume that vehicles with good small overlap front ratings would protect the driver and the passenger equally. But a recent study from the IIHS proves that passengers aren't as protected as drivers. The IIHS conducted the test on seven small SUVs with good driver-side small overlap ratings and only one of the vehicles, the 2016 Hyundai Tucson, performed well enough to be given a good rating. The other SUVs performance ranged from poor to acceptable. After reviewing the results of the test, the IIHS is deliberating whether it should institute a passenger-side rating as part of its Top Safety Pick criteria. "This is an important aspect of occupant protection that needs more attention," states Becky Mueller, lead author of the study and an IIHS senior research engineer. "More than 1,600 right-front passengers died in frontal crashes in 2014." Since the small overlap front test was introduced, 13 automakers have made structural changes to 97 vehicles with roughly three-quarters earning a good rating after the adjustments. The IIHS' test for frontal ratings is completed with a dummy in the driver's seat and with a barrier overlapping the driver's side. Which makes sense, as passengers aren't always riding in a vehicle. "It's not surprising that automakers would focus their initial efforts to improve small overlap protection on the side of the vehicle that we conduct the tests on," states David Zuby, IIHS executive vice president and chief research officer. "In fact, we encouraged them to do that in the short term if it mean they could quickly make driver-side improvements to more vehicles. As time goes by, though, we would hope they ensure similar levels of protection on both sides." As the IIHS' test revealed, there's a massive difference in safety between the two front seats. Increase passenger safety, according to Mueller, would require automakers to strengthen the occupant compartment by using a different type of material or by making it thicker.

Next Lotus Elise to draw from its roots

Wed, Jul 27 2016

Recently-appointed Lotus CEO Jean-Marc Gales told Autocar that work on the new Lotus Elise, which is coming in 2020, is already underway, and thanks to growing sales, the automaker is set to make a profit for the first time in 20 years. Gales also dropped some details about the new sports cars' design philosophy and underpinnings. According to the report, the new Elise will utilize the same aluminum chassis technology found in the original Elise and won't bear any resemblance to the 2010 Elise concept. Instead, the upcoming vehicle will uphold its roots with a lightweight design that emphasizes driver involvement at an affordable price. The new Elise is rumored to weigh in at roughly 1,984 pounds, almost 384 pounds more than the original Elise. In order to meet US crash ratings, the Elise will most likely be wider, but have the same length as the current model. Power will probably come from a Toyota unit producing between 134 horsepower and 245 horsepower. The Elise is expected to come to the US where it will be offered with a manual and automatic transmission, which will both come from Toyota as well. Gales claims Lotus has more orders now than in any year in the last 10 years, with the US being one of the automaker's most important markets. Related Video: