Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Sequoia Sr5, 4x4, Loaded, New Tires, New Inspection, Mint, Must See on 2040-cars

US $7,975.00
Year:2003 Mileage:161575 Color: Blue /
 Brown
Location:

Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, United States

Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:V8 4.7L DOHC
Fuel Type:GAS
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 5TDBT44A33S180392
Year: 2003
Make: Toyota
Doors: 4
Model: Sequoia
Fuel: Gasoline
Drivetrain: 4WD
Mileage: 161,575
Trim: SR5 Sport Utility 4-Door
Sub Model: SR5
Drive Type: 4WD
Exterior Color: Blue
Number of Cylinders: 8
Interior Color: Brown
Warranty: No

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Walburn Auto Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1261 Scott St, Hegins
Phone: (570) 797-1577

Vans Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 990 Bears Den Rd, Wheatland
Phone: (330) 799-2771

United Automotive Service Center LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive
Address: 1135 Wayne Ave, Shady-Grove
Phone: (717) 977-3052

Tomsic Motor Co ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 150 Racetrack Rd, Claysville
Phone: (724) 228-1330

Team One Auto Group ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 440 Loucks Rd, Dover
Phone: (717) 846-8326

Suburban Collision Specs Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 210 N Chester Pike, Chester
Phone: (610) 461-2700

Auto blog

Toyota tops Consumer Reports best, worst used car values

Tue, 18 Mar 2014

We often mock Toyota for building boring, soulless cars, but a new study by Consumer Reports suggests that regardless of whether that's true, the company has some of the best used cars on the market. In its report on used cars from 2004-2013, the Japanese automaker had 11 vehicles among its brands on the list - more than any other automaker.
CR breaks the list down by cost and vehicle size, and Toyota has at least one entry at every price point and in nearly every segment. To score a recommendation, a vehicle had to perform well in the magazine's initial tests and score above-average reliability results. It also tried to only suggest cars with electronic stability control. Of the 28 recommended vehicles, Honda/Acura had the second most mentions at six, and Ford, Hyundai and Subaru managed two each.
The Detroit brands also made it to the list, but not in a positive way. Consumer Reports compiled a list of 22 vehicles it wouldn't recommend because "they have multiple years of much-worse-than-average overall reliability." General Motors had the most unrecommended models on the list at six, but Chrysler and Ford weren't far behind, with five cars each from their brands not making the grade. The full list of recommendations is available on CR's website.

Toyota Prius sales could come up short in 2013

Sat, 06 Jul 2013

A Toyota executive has said that the automaker's hybrid Prius model may not reach its 2013 goal of selling 250,000 units in the US marketplace. Bill Fay, group vice president for Toyota's US sales, told Reuters, "The 240,000 to 250,000 range is kind of where we're settling our sights for the Prius family."
The first-generation Prius, a five-passenger model, was introduced to the States in 2001 (its arrival made it the second mass-produced hybrid, after the two-seat Honda Insight). The second-generation model arrived in 2004, followed by the current third-generation design that arrived for the 2010 model year. The automaker has subsequently added the Prius V, a hatchback wagon (shown above) and the Prius C, a subcompact hatchback. As of March, 2013, cumulative worldwide sales of the Prius had reached 3.67 million units.
Last year, Toyota sold 236,659 Prius models in the US. However, sales of the model have fallen 5.1 percent in the first six months of 2013. In response, the automaker has boosted its marketing for the model, and the promotions are expected to continue through at least July.

At meeting with automakers, Trump launches new attack on NAFTA

Fri, May 11 2018

WASHINGTON — Ten American and foreign automakers went to the White House on Friday to push for a weakening of U.S. fuel efficiency standards through 2025, while President Donald Trump used the occasion to launch a fresh attack on the North American Free Trade Agreement that has benefited the companies. A draft proposal circulated by the U.S. Transportation Department would freeze fuel efficiency requirements at 2020 levels through 2026, rather than allowing them to increase as previously planned. Trump's administration is expected to formally unveil the proposal later this month or in June. "We're working on CAFE standards, environmental controls," Trump told reporters at the top of the meeting, referring to the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards for cars and light trucks in the United States. Trump said he wants automakers to build more vehicles in the United States and export more vehicles. But much of the hour-long meeting focused on NAFTA. Trump blasted the pact involving the United States, Canada and Mexico as "terrible" and noted that negotiations to make changes sought by his administration were ongoing. "NAFTA has been a horrible, horrible disaster for this country and we'll see if we can make it reasonable," Trump said. Automakers have called NAFTA a success, allowing them to integrate production throughout North America and make production competitive with Asia and Europe, and have noted the increase in auto production over the past two decades with the deal in place. They have warned that changing NAFTA too much could prompt some companies to move production out of the United States. The chief executives of General Motors Co, Ford Motor Co, Fiat Chrysler, along with senior U.S. executives from Toyota Motor Corp, Volkswagen AG, Hyundai Motor Co, Nissan Motor Co, Honda Motor Co , BMW AG and Daimler AG met with Trump, as did the chief executives of two auto trade groups. Major automakers reiterated this week they do not support freezing fuel efficiency requirements but said they want new flexibility and rule changes to address lower gasoline prices and the shift in U.S. consumer preferences to bigger, less fuel-efficient vehicles.