Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1995 Toyota Land Cruiser Fzj80 "factory Locking Differentials" on 2040-cars

Year:1995 Mileage:211740
Location:

Portland, Oregon, United States

Portland, Oregon, United States
Advertising:

 

This is a 1995 Toyota Land Cruiser FZJ80 with 211K miles. This cruiser is equipped with the factory electronic locking differentials, OME suspension system, 35" Nitto trail grappler tires mounted on 17" trail ready bead lock wheels, off-road lights on the roof rack and bumpers. This rig is ready to hit the trail with custom front and rear bumpers, Metal Tech rock sliders, and a brand new TJM Yulara roof top tent.

If you're looking for a cool reliable truck to take on your next off road expedition, or  just a fun weekend of camping with the family this is a great choice!

Auto Services in Oregon

The Parkrose Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 11257 NE Sandy Blvd, Fairview
Phone: (503) 360-9445

Racers Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 18805 NE Glisan St, Gresham
Phone: (503) 665-3222

Portland Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass Coating & Tinting, Windows
Address: 16869 65th Ave #3, Troutdale
Phone: (503) 407-4688

PM Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 2406 Main St, Fall-Creek
Phone: (541) 746-1195

Pioneer Auto Wholesale ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 500 W Clarendon St, Troutdale
Phone: (503) 656-4021

Oregon Engine Rebuilders ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Engine Rebuilding, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 20740 SE Firwood Rd, Bridal-Veil
Phone: (503) 668-7155

Auto blog

2019 Subaru Forester Sport vs 2019 Toyota RAV4 Adventure: How they compare

Mon, May 6 2019

The 2019 Toyota RAV4 is not only completely redesigned, but reimagined as well. As we detailed in our first drive review, the new RAV4 ditches the more car-like and uber-utilitarian nature of its predecessor for something that's more SUV-like and characterful. It's a new direction exemplified in the RAV4 Adventure trim, which specifically targets those folks who plan to actually take their compact crossover to the great outdoors. People who will get it dirty, use the extra ground clearance and store things on the roof. You know, the sort of people who would consider the 2019 Subaru Forester. It too is redesigned for 2019, but its transformation is almost unnoticeable compared to the RAV4's. Forester customers were obviously quite happy with the way things were. We got a chance to drive both the 2019 RAV4 and 2019 Forester back-to-back last week both on-road and off-road, so let's take a look at how they compare, including a look at their on-paper specs. 2019 Toyota RAV4 Adventure View 31 Photos Performance and fuel economy The Forester got a new, more powerful 2.5-liter flat-four engine for 2019, and it now comes standard with a continuously variable transmission. It produces 182 horsepower and 176 pound-feet of torque, which is pretty much mid-pack among compact crossovers. Crucially, though, throttle response is so sharp that it makes the Forester actually feel quicker than it is when accelerating from a stop — a sensation enhanced even further by selecting the Sport Sharp mode button on the steering wheel. However, in either mode, the engine's remarkable power reveals itself as the tachometer and speedometer wind toward higher digits. One must also deal with the Forester's CVT. Perhaps some may appreciate the smooth, uninterrupted acceleration that results from a lack of gear changes (nor even simulated ones as in some other company's CVTs), but others may find it unusual and irritating. Subaru's CVT is certainly not our favorite example. By contrast, the 2019 RAV4 is conventional with its 2.5-liter inline-four engine and eight-speed automatic transmission, which behaves just as normally and effectively as one expects. The RAV4 is also considerably more powerful at 203 hp and 184 lb-ft — both compared to the Forester and to the entire segment as well. As a result, its acceleration is stronger (likely a difference of a half-second in 0-60-mph time) even if it may not initially feel like it.

Toyota to recall 185k cars globally, including Yaris

Thu, 04 Jul 2013

Toyota has announced it is recalling a total of 185,000 vehicles worldwide for a power steering issue. Yaris and (overseas) Vitz models built between November 2010 and March 2012 could suffer a short circuit in their power steering control module if water gets inside. Should that happen, the power steering could fail, increasing effort when turning. The recall also includes the Verso-S and Ractis built from August 2010 to August 2011. The recall covers 130,000 vehicles in Japan and around 22,450 in Europe.
Only 74 units are being recalled in the United States.
Toyota says if the fault occurs, the vehicle will display the Electronic Power Steering warning light on the dash and a buzzer will sound. The automaker will alert owners by mail and dealers will replace the power steering control module free of charge. You can read the quick press release on the recall below for more information.

Toyota settles for $3M after being found liable in sudden acceleration case

Sat, 26 Oct 2013

A jury has decided that faulty software was to blame for a crash involving a 2005 Toyota Camry that killed one woman and injured another. This is the first time Toyota has been found liable by a jury in a lawsuit involving sudden acceleration claims. Toyota has maintained that driver error is the most likely cause for cases of sudden acceleration.
Shortly after the jury in the case, which took place in Oklahoma and centered around a crash that injured 76-year-old Jean Bookout and killed her passenger, Barbara Schwarz, reached a verdict that would see Toyota paying $3 million in compensatory damages, a confidential settlement was reached. The jury, which had found Toyota liable for "reckless disregard" for public safety, had yet to decide what punitive damages Toyota would face.
Toyota said in a statement, "While we strongly disagree with the verdict, we are satisfied that the parties reached a mutually acceptable agreement to settle this case. We will continue to defend our products vigorously at trial in other legal venues."