Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Toyota Camry Xle on 2040-cars

US $26,620.00
Year:2014 Mileage:0 Color: Magnetic Gray /
 Ash
Location:

3232 Harper Rd., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

3232 Harper Rd., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:2.5L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 4T4BF1FK3ER399753
Stock Num: 28279
Make: Toyota
Model: Camry XLE
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Magnetic Gray
Interior Color: Ash
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Audio controls on steering wheel
  • Bluetooth wireless phone connectivity
  • Braking Assist
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-dash
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Daytime running lights
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Driver and passenger knee airbags
  • External temperature display
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Four-wheel Independent Suspension
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front Hip Room: 54.5"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.6"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 58.0"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 17.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 25 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 35 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 4,630 lbs.
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Independent rear suspension
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 8.6 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 15 cu.ft.
  • Mechanical remote trunk release
  • MP3 player
  • Overall height: 57.9"
  • Overall Length: 189.2"
  • Overall Width: 71.7"
  • Overhead console: Mini with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear bench
  • Rear center sea
  • Rear Hip Room: 54.5"
  • Rear Leg Room: 38.9"
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 56.6"
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside under cargo
  • Speed Sensitive Audio Volume Control
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Stability control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Strut front suspension
  • Strut rear suspension
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Total Number of Speakers: 6
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV II
  • Video Monitor Location: Front
  • Wheelbase: 109.3"
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors

Butler Toyota Scion is Indiana's largest Toyota Scion dealer. We have been doing business with integrity since 1966. Be sure to visit WWW.BUTLER-TOYOTA.COM for exclusive Butler website specials.

Auto Services in Indiana

World Wide Automotive Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 2661 W Schmaltz Blvd, Unionville
Phone: (812) 339-9261

World Hyundai of Matteson ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 5337 Miller Circle Dr, Dyer
Phone: (708) 983-6500

William`s Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing
Address: Bowling-Green
Phone: (812) 533-2866

Twin City Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 600 Farabee Dr, Montmorenci
Phone: (765) 447-2999

Trevino`s Auto Sales ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 500 W 150th St, East-Chicago
Phone: (219) 397-1138

Tom Cherry Muffler ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 1203 N College Ave, Gosport
Phone: (812) 323-1456

Auto blog

Chrysler, Nissan minivans earn 'dire' crash test results, says IIHS [w/video]

Fri, Nov 21 2014

First introduced in 2012, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's small-overlap frontal crash test has become the bane of many auto engineers' existence. It's a particularly steep design challenge because it forces just 25 percent of a vehicle's front end to take the brunt of a 40-mile-per-hour impact. The newly released results of four family-minded minivans underscore just how difficult the crash test is: only one scored an Acceptable rating, and the other three did very poorly. The 2008-2015 Chrysler Town & Country and Dodge Grand Caravan, plus the 2011-2015 Nissan Quest, all received Poor ratings in the test, the IIHS' lowest possible score. The three of them showed significant crash intrusion into the driver's area. The dummy in the Nissan actually had to be cut out of the vehicle, with an IIHS spokesperson remarking, "the structure collapsed like a house of cards." In the Fiat Chrysler Automobile vans, the steering wheels moved out of the way, making the airbag less effective and letting the driver's head hit the dashboard. While it was not actually crashed, the agency is also giving the 2009-12 Volkswagen Routan a Poor score because it shares a structure with the FCA models. The newly released results of four minivans underscore just how difficult the small-offset crash test is. The refreshed 2015 Toyota Sienna (shown), conversely, earned an Acceptable rating and is also a Top Safety Pick+ because of its optional forward collision warning and automatic braking system. While the crash test dummy moved around during the impact more than the agency would have liked, sensors showed a low risk of injuries. The IIHS tested the Honda Odyssey last year, and it earned a Good overall score, the agency's best ranking. It's also a Top Safety Pick+ vehicle. The only member of the minivan segment left to test is the latest Kia Sedona, and the Institute is reportedly waiting a little longer for Kia to make changes to improve the model's performance. When reached for comment, Nissan spokesperson Steve Yaeger provided Autoblog with the following statement: "Nissan is committed to vehicle safety and believes that consumers should have information about crash protection so they can make educated buying decisions. Nissan is proud of the 2014 Quest's "good" rating in the IIHS front moderate overlap and side impact tests as well as a "good" head restraint rating.

A new Toyota MR2? We want to believe

Thu, Mar 9 2017

In the wake of a busy Geneva auto show, the rumor mill is churning, and the latest grist involves one of the most beloved Toyota sports cars of all time. EVO reports that Tetsuya Tada, the chief of the Scion FR-S/Toyota 86 project and a hard-liner about sportscar priorities (light and nimble, but with modest horsepower), wants a third vehicle for Toyota's nascent sporty lineup. Currently, we know there's a Supra-like vehicle in the works, being co-developed with BMW, and the 86 is sticking around. Tada said he'd like a third sportscar to compliment the two we know about, and that he wants it soon. A quick bit of history: Toyota's classic sporty lineup had three components. The most visible was the Supra, whose power and prestige grew as the car evolved from a cushy personal tourer to a high-horsepower, high-technology icon. The Celica was its Clark Kent, more mild mannered but also more accessible and affordable. The third was the MR2, a mid-engined go-kart that lasted for three distinct generations. Each had its charms, and all have their fans. When Tada says that he wants three sportscars in the lineup, we already know about the Supra successor, and the 86 is already filling the Celica's role, so the blank is easy to fill. It doesn't sound like Tada spoke the word "MR2" to EVO, or hinted that the car would be mid-engined, but Tada doesn't seem to say anything without purpose. Whatever the layout, this third car – if it comes to fruition – will probably play a role similar to the MR2 in relation to its stablemates. To translate: it'll likely be even lighter and more nimble, and probably less powerful, than the 86. The closest real-world analogue to the pure MR2 ideal is the Honda S660, a mid-engined Kei roadster that's on sale in Japan right now. It's light, small, and powered by a 0.66-liter inline-three. Toyota could decide to directly compete with the S660, borrow an engine from its small-car specialist subsidiary Daihatsu, and produce a mid-engined MR2. Another possibility, even simpler from Toyota's perspective, would be to adapt the existing Daihatsu Copen roadster. Sure, it's front-engine and front-wheel drive, but it's a small, light roadster. And even better, it sells abroad with a larger 1.3-liter engine. Restyle it slightly, perhaps to resemble the S-FR concept of a couple years ago, and it's an off-the-shelf solution. The S-FR itself is a third possibility.

Toyota Land Cruiser vs Lexus LX 570 Suspension Flex Test

Thu, May 21 2020

There’s no need to explain the Toyota Land Cruiser, one of ToyotaÂ’s earliest successful products. The 2020 Toyota Land Cruiser Heritage Edition celebrates some 60 years of popularity of a vehicle that has survived the segmentÂ’s “mall wagon” phase and the rise of crossovers. Its already-sterling reputation has received an additional recent push from the rise of overlanding — an outdoor pastime that has always existed but only recently got a press agent. By comparison, the Lexus LX is a more recent development. Debuting in 1996, the LX 450 was little more than an 80-series Land Cruiser with cladding, a Lexus badge and a higher price. The amount of styling differentiation and luxury specialization has increased over the years to the point that the newest LX 570 actually seems like a completely different vehicle. In truth, the 2020 Lexus LX 570 and the 2020 Toyota Land Cruiser are both 200-series Land Cruisers under the skin. They share the same thirsty 5.7-liter V8 engine and the same frame that features a double-wishbone suspension at the front, a five-link coil spring suspension at the rear and a 112.2-inch wheelbase in the middle. The styling is strikingly different, of course, but so are the hidden details of their suspensions. The Land Cruiser employs a simple set of coil springs and shock absorbers, but with an interconnected pair of automatically disconnecting stabilizer bars called KDSS (Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System). The Lexus, on the other hand, has fixed stabilizer bars and coil springs, but its “shocks” are really hydraulic cylinders that perform height adjustments and transmit suspension movements via piping to remote electronically-adjustable damper valves mounted along the frame rails. All of the above begs a question: Which of them will go farther up my RTI ramp and, by extension, offer better suspension articulation in an authentic off-road situation? Right away, the very approach to the ramp demonstrates a huge difference and a serious issue for the LX. Its normal cruising height (there is a lower height, but this isnÂ’t that) doesnÂ’t provide enough approach clearance to attempt the ramp. The front spoiler contacts the nasty grating before the tire does. ItÂ’s a close-run thing, but from this point on, clearance gets SMALLER as the left front suspension compresses on the way up. If it's touching now, itÂ’s only going to get worse if I go forward.