2019 Model 3 2019 Long Range Awd Fsd Autopilot Nav Pano Camera on 2040-cars
Vehicle Title:Clean
Body Type:Sedan
Engine:Electric 449hp 389ft. lbs.
Transmission:Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5YJ3E1EB5KF494083
Mileage: 66220
Warranty: No
Model: Model 3
Fuel: Electric
Drivetrain: AWD
Sub Model: 2019 Long Range AWD FSD AUTOPILOT NAV PANO CAMERA
Trim: 2019 Long Range AWD FSD AUTOPILOT NAV PANO CAMERA
Doors: 4
Exterior Color: Pearl White Multi-Coat
Interior Color: Black
Make: Tesla
Tesla Model 3 for Sale
2022 tesla model 3 long range awd 4dr sedan(US $32,999.00)
2021 tesla model 3 standard range plus(US $27,995.00)
2020 tesla model 3 performance awd(US $21,900.00)
2023 tesla model 3(US $26,200.00)
2022 tesla model 3(US $12,100.00)
2023 tesla model 3(US $25,300.00)
Auto blog
Tesla trademark suit in China ends with settlement
Wed, 06 Aug 2014After years of fighting, Tesla has finally put its trademark dispute in China with businessman Zhan Baosheng behind it, thanks to an undisclosed settlement. The news comes at a perfect time for the automaker, which is still setting up its dealers there.
According to an email from Tesla cited by Bloomberg, the two sides came to an agreement "completely and amicably," but the business isn't revealing what it cost to resolve the conflict. As part of the settlement, Zhan is also transferring his ownership of the tesla.cn and teslamotors.cn over to the company. "Mr. Zhan has agreed to have the Chinese authorities complete the process of canceling the Tesla trademarks that he had registered or applied for, at no cost to Tesla," said the statement, according to Bloomberg. "Collectively, these actions remove any doubt with respect to Tesla's undisputed rights to its trademarks in China."
Zhan had claimed to hold the trademark on the Tesla name in China since 2009, but he was appealing a ruling by the country's courts invalidating those rights. The situation heated up even further in July when Zhan sued the automaker for trademark infringement and asked for 23.9 million yuan ($3.9 million) in damages, plus for the company shut down all of its operations there. Tesla had reportedly already attempted to settle with him years ago for 2 million yuan ($325,000 at current rates), but Zhan countered with a figure of the equivalent of over $32 million.
Tesla expects another higher-volume deal with Toyota in next few years
Tue, 09 Sep 2014Four months have passed since Toyota ended its relationship with Tesla Motors, in which the electric-vehicle specialist supplied full lithium-ion battery packs to the Japanese behemoth for its RAV4 EV rollout, of which 2,500 vehicles will be completed. Now, Tesla founder and CEO Elon Musk has been heard suggesting that a future collaboration is likely within the next two to three years, and that it will probably be much larger than the last one.
Both Tesla and Toyota have sung each other's praises in the not-too-distant past, Toyota telling Autoblog back in May, "We have a good relationship with Tesla and will evaluate the feasibility of working together on future projects." According to Automotive News, Musk said of the Japanese giant, "We love working with Toyota... We have a huge amount of respect for them as a company and certainly much to learn."
Interestingly, though, the two automakers have rather divergent strategies for eco-friendly automobiles. Toyota, as you're surely aware, is the clear-cut leader in hybrids and has thrown its massive support in the direction of hydrogen fuel cells, while Tesla has invested heavily in battery-electric technology and high-speed charging stations.
Tesla settles lemon lawsuit brought on by Lemon Law King Vince Megna
Thu, Jul 17 2014As much as we're weary about giving so-called Lemon Law King Vince Megna more space on these pages, we've decided it's worth letting you all know that his client has settled his lawsuit with Tesla Motors over a Model S sedan that he claims was a lemon. As you may remember, the electric sedan in question, a 2013 Signature Performance Model S, was owned by a doctor in Wisconsin who claimed that his shiny new car required servicing so often that he had it in the shop for 66 days in his first few months of ownership. The owner claims to have asked Tesla to buy the car back three separate times and claims to be able to provide proof of such, though Tesla previously refuted that version of events, suggesting in a blog posting that the owner may have tampered with a fuse. In the end, the two parties decided to settle, with Tesla agreeing to pay Robert Montgomery, the owner, $126,836 to cover the car's cost along with his taxes and attorney fees. Case closed. If you'd like to see Megna's own video discussing the settlement, scroll down below. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.