Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Saab 9-5 Turbo4 Premium/pano Roof/only 13k Miles!/flawless Condition! Buy!! on 2040-cars

US $23,495.00
Year:2011 Mileage:13320 Color: VIN
Location:

Chantilly, Virginia, United States

Chantilly, Virginia, United States


2011 Saab 9-5

Mileage: 13152
Stock #: P1088
Body Style: SEDAN 4-DR
Color: Gray Exterior
VIN: YS3GN4AR3B4007677

Price: $23,495.00

  Click here to view more detail and pictures for this vehicle

Snap Car Buying
(703)-988-2145
25350 Pleasant Valley Road Chantilly,  VA 20152

ONLY 13K ORIGINAL MILES!! Snap Car Buying presents Sleek #1. Hard-to-find, extremely low miles, Saab 9-5 sedan - drive it once, and you might want to get out for paperwork. Unbeatable pricing - do you research - you won''''t find a better deal! Turbo! Call 855.355.SNAP for inquiries and test drives. We can arrange financing for you, if necessary. No hidden fees - processing fee of $299 will be applied to the price of the vehicle. Call today!

Auto Services in Virginia

Whitten Brothers Mazda ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 900 Johnston Willis Drive, Moseley
Phone: (866) 595-6470

West Broad Audi ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 9001 W Broad St, Manakin-Sabot
Phone: (804) 270-9000

Watkin`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 104 S Henry St, Spencer
Phone: (336) 573-9115

Virginia Auto Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 17906 Fraley Blvd, Lake-Ridge
Phone: (703) 441-2020

Victory Lane Auto Sales ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 3245 Boulevard, Pocahontas
Phone: (804) 524-0640

Van`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 77 Wayside Dr, Weyers-Cave
Phone: (540) 234-8294

Auto blog

NEVS announces 200 layoffs as it says Saab restart will 'take time'

Fri, 26 Sep 2014

For a fleeting moment a few weeks ago, the news from Saab-owner National Electric Vehicle Sweden appeared almost positive. The company had its reorganization plan approved (a day after it was denied), and the automaker was actually showing a real, running vehicle, albeit one with a top speed of 75 miles per hour. But those tiny crumbs of potential goodness have been swept away because NEVS has announced layoffs of as many as 200 factory employees in September "due to lack of work."
Workers probably shouldn't get too eager to return to the factory either, because company's "decision to re-start production will be further delayed" by an unspecified amount of time, NEVS says in a press release. To begin assembling cars again, the company needs to find long-term funding and a new majority owner. Those seem like two very steep hurdles for the embattled automaker to clear.
Despite not producing cars since May, NEVS still claims it's negotiating with a new owner, possibly Mahindra, but according to Reuters, the Swedish company owes about 400 million kronor ($56 million) to creditors. According to its layoff announcement, getting rid of these workers is one step in the business' reorganization plan to be presented on October 8. Scroll down to read its full release.

Spyker files $3 billion lawsuit against General Motors over Saab's demise

Mon, 06 Aug 2012

"Smack." That's the sound of Spyker's process server dropping a big ol' pile of legal documents on the doorstep of The Renaissance Center, home of General Motors - or wherever GM's attorneys live during business hours. Contained therein is a Complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and demanding a jury trial, that seeks $3 billion in damages due to "the unlawful actions GM took to avoid competition with Saab Automobile in the Chinese market." Spyker accuses GM of "tortiously interfering" with Saab's business relationship with Chinese automaker Zhejiang Youngman Lotus Automobile (Youngman), actions that Spyker CEO Victor Muller (above) said "deliberately drove Saab Automobile into bankruptcy."
(From Wikipedia: "Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when a person intentionally damages the plaintiff's contractual or other business relationships.")
The interference in question specifically refers to the very last potential deal, called the Framework Agreement, that Spyker worked out with Youngman. With lots of GM engineering embedded into the 9-4X and 9-5, The General had the right to approve any Saab partnership that would involve the transfer of GM intellectual property. Spyker had been rebuffed over every previous deal with a Chinese firm, including two bids by Youngman, due to GM concerns over its IP getting into Chinese hands and having to face Chinese-market competitors using its technology. The Complaint alleges that the Framework Agreement would have put a firewall around all GM IP - Youngman would only work on Saab's Phoenix platform, said to be just about free of GM tech, and would have no access to 9-3, 9-4X or 9-5 technology until after Saab ceased all ties to GM.

Saab's latest Chinese owners facing their own credit woes

Sat, 16 Aug 2014

Poor Saab, it can't seem to get a break. General Motors couldn't seem to make a go of it, neither could Spyker, and now it seems that its latest owner is encountering some problems of its own.
That owner, of course, is National Electric Vehicle Sweden, a Swedish holding company owned by Chinese investors. NEVS recently restarted production at the Saab plant in Trollhättan, Sweden, and had some ambitious plans for the brand's revival, but it appears to have run out of cash.
This according to a report in The Wall Street Journal, which discovered that NEVS is having trouble paying its suppliers. One such supplier, called Labo Test, has reportedly been owed some $22,000 by NEVS since February, and without payment, petitioned the Swedish government to place NEVS into bankruptcy proceedings. If that seems a little extreme to you over twenty-two grand, it would seem the parties agree, as the petition has reportedly since been withdrawn.