2014 Nissan Versa 1.6 Sv on 2040-cars
1609 S Main St, Laurinburg, North Carolina, United States
Engine:1.6L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic CVT
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3N1CN7AP5EL806867
Stock Num: 806867
Make: Nissan
Model: Versa 1.6 SV
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Gray
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 16888
Scotland Motors has helped thousands of people find the perfect vehicle at the best price. Our professional staff is trained to help you with the entire process of buying a car! Offering the best in used vehicles since 1967! We service our cars right here for you! Have peace of mind buying your next vehicle from Scotland Motors! Most of our vehicles have warranties available. Extended warranties are also available. ****Call Scotland Motors today to find out how you can qualify for a beautiful pre-owned vehicle at 888-577-0469 or 888-577-0469 We have a full service department able to handle all makes and models, and a car rental agency on site. We have relationships with several banks and finance companies to handle the financing needs of our customers.
Nissan Versa for Sale
2014 nissan versa note sv(US $18,431.00)
2015 nissan versa 1.6 s(US $12,800.00)
2014 nissan versa 1.6 s(US $12,754.00)
2014 nissan versa 1.6 s+(US $14,755.00)
2014 nissan versa note s plus(US $16,002.00)
2014 nissan versa note s plus(US $16,168.00)
Auto Services in North Carolina
Xpress Lube ★★★★★
Wrightsboro Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Wilburn Auto Body Shop - Lake Norman ★★★★★
Wheeler Troy Honda Car Service ★★★★★
Truck Alterations ★★★★★
Troy`s Auto & Machine Shop ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 Nissan Rogue earns IIHS Top Safety Pick+ [w/videos]
Thu, 20 Mar 2014The 2014 Nissan Rogue has scored a Top Safety Pick+ award following positive crash test results by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The new crossover scored good results (the highest rating) in the group's five crashworthiness checks and a basic rating for front crash prevention.
The IIHS found that the Rogue also performed well in its small overlap front test with a low risk of injuries, and the driver's space maintained its structure well. It was an improvement over the previous generation, which received a marginal rating in that evaluation. The Rogue's optional forward collision warning system was enough for a basic rating in avoiding accidents.
To qualify as a Top Safety Pick, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the the moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint evaluations, plus a good or acceptable result in the small overlap front test. To receive the additional Plus rating in 2014, it must also have a basic, advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention. The IIHS scores vehicles as good, acceptable, marginal or poor, and avoidance systems are scored basic, advanced or superior, depending on the type of system and its performance. Scroll down to watch the videos of the small and moderate overlap crash tests and read the full IIHS statement.
Least favorite vehicles of 2017
Fri, Dec 22 2017The Autoblog staff has driven a lot of vehicles in 2017. This video showcases our least favorite vehicles from this year, along with some thoughts on why they made the list. Wanna read more head over to https://www.autoblog.com/photos/least-favorite-cars-2017/ BMW Fiat Lexus Nissan RAM Toyota Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video nismo nissan sentra fiat 500x Arts and Entertainment 500x bmw m240i rogue
Cadillac tops Tesla in Consumer Reports semi-automated driving test
Thu, Oct 4 2018General Motors' Cadillac outscored Tesla in a new ranking of partially automated driving systems tested by Consumer Reports and released on Thursday. The highly influential nonprofit organization, which tests and rates a variety of consumer products from appliances to vehicles, said it compared Cadillac's Super Cruise and Tesla's Autopilot with similar systems from Nissan and Volvo. Nissan's ProPilot Assist was ranked third and Volvo's Pilot Assist fourth. Consumer Reports said it has been testing partially automated driving systems for several years but elected to conduct a formal study intended for publication, because "we are at a tipping point where they are now going mainstream," according to Jake Fisher, director of auto testing. The organization said its tests, conducted on a private track and on public roads in Connecticut, were designed to measure the systems' ability to automatically control steering and speed in certain situations, while helping drivers pay attention and regain manual control of the vehicle when required. CR noted that any of these systems can increase driving risk if used in inappropriate situations, or if drivers become inattentive or over-reliant on them. While they can help relieve driver stress and fatigue, Consumer Reports said, the partially automated systems are "not intended to be self-driving features." The systems typically use cameras, radar and other sensors, as well as mapping data, to monitor location and traffic conditions and help keep a vehicle centered in the lane at a safe distance behind other cars. Each system has limitations. Cadillac's Super Cruise, for instance, only functions on divided highways that have been mapped by GM. In contrast, Tesla's Autopilot can be used even on small, curvy roads with poor lane markings, but "operates erratically in those situations," Consumer Reports said.The organization tested Super Cruise on the Cadillac CT6; Autopilot on the Tesla Model 3, Model X and Model S; ProPilot Assist on the Nissan Leaf and Infiniti QX50; and Pilot Assist on the Volvo XC40 and XC60. Consumer Reports said Cadillac's Super Cruise did "the best job of balancing high-tech capabilities with ensuring the car is operated safely and the driver is paying attention." Tesla's Autopilot was cited for its capability and ease of use, while Nissan's ProPilot Assist did a better job than Autopilot or Volvo's Pilot Assist in keeping drivers engaged.
















