2006 Nissan Murano Sl Sport Utility 4-door 3.5l Black Automatic Start on 2040-cars
Springville, Utah, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Mileage: 127,464
Make: Nissan
Sub Model: SL
Model: Murano
Exterior Color: Black
Trim: SL Sport Utility 4-Door
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: AWD
Number of Cylinders: 6
Options: Sunroof, Cassette Player, Leather Seats, CD Player, Automatic Remote Start
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Nissan Murano for Sale
- 2007 nissan murano sl 3.5l v6 rear cam bose only 72k mi texas direct auto(US $14,980.00)
- 2006 nissan murano s(US $9,500.00)
- 2009 nissan murano le~awd~nav~rcam~dual roof~htd lea~1 owner(US $20,990.00)
- Sl all wheel drive leather sun roof bose roof rails(US $13,995.00)
- 3.5l 240 horsepower 3.5 liter v6 dohc engine with variable valve timin 4 doors(US $14,799.00)
- 2012 nissan murano awd 4dr sv air conditioning alloy wheels cruise control
Auto Services in Utah
Volkswagen SouthTowne ★★★★★
Tunex ★★★★★
Tip Top Transmission ★★★★★
Superior Auto Repair ★★★★★
Precision Auto Glass ★★★★★
Payson Auto Care ★★★★★
Auto blog
Mercedes considering Mexico for CLA production
Tue, 16 Jul 2013Would you buy a Mercedes-Benz if it were made in Mexico? That's what the German outfit is wondering, as it considers localizing production of the its new budget model at a factory operated by Nissan, of which the automaker is a joint-venture partner.
According to a report from Automotive News, moving production of American-spec CLAs from Hungary to Mexico would protect Mercedes from currency fluctuations. "Mexico is the best location for the United States," Daimler Chairman Dieter Zetsche told AN. The CLA is also expected to become the brand's volume model in the US market, which makes North American production a logical move.
In the event that Mercedes approves the plan, Nissan would expand the capabilities at its Aguascalientes, Mexico plant, allowing production to begin in 2018.
Nissan working on something radical for Le Mans
Tue, 17 Dec 2013With Porsche joining Audi and Toyota at the front of the LMP1 grid at Le Mans next year, Nissan is the next to be throwing its hat (and considerable R&D budget) into the proverbial ring. But only if it's allowed to do something radically different, according to the latest report in Car magazine.
Just what that means remains to be seen, but Nissan is reportedly in active discussions with the ACO (the body that governs the race) to see how far it can stretch the regulations. The ACO has taken an intriguingly different approach to equalizing performance, mandating the maximum amount of energy that can be used per lap instead of telling teams what kind of engines they can use. That's how Porsche is entering with a four-cylinder engine, Toyota with a V8 and Audi with a diesel six. But when it comes to the shape of the car itself, the rules are considerably more restrictive.
Unfortunately the rules would prohibit Nissan fielding the ZEOD RC (with its narrow front track) in the LMP1 class, relegating it instead to the Garage 56 slot for experimental racers (which the DeltaWing filled before). And the realities of endurance racing would effectively prohibit anyone from fielding an all-electric racer. Within those confines, though, Nissan is eager to find enough wiggle room to make something both visually and technically different from other LMPs. And if the ACO won't let it do so at Le Mans, it could turn to another race or series (like the Nürburgring 24) that would.
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.