Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2013 Nissan Frontier Sv "brand New Condition" on 2040-cars

US $22,700.00
Year:2013 Mileage:13642 Color: Graphite Blue /
 Gray
Location:

Port Charlotte, Florida, United States

Port Charlotte, Florida, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Rebuilt, Rebuildable & Reconstructed
Engine:4.0L 3954CC V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1N6AD0ER1DN753347
Year: 2013
Make: Nissan
Model: Frontier
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Trim: SV Extended Cab Pickup 4-Door
Options: Vehicle Dynamic Control (VDC), Nissan Vehicle Immobilizer System, 60/40 Split Fold-Down Rear Seat, Cruise Control, 6-speaker Audio system with 4.3 color display, SiriusXM Satellite Radio, USB/Iphone connectivity, Bluetooth hands free phone system, Rear Sonar system, Rear View Camera, Fog Lights, Factory Spray-On Bed Liner, Utili-track Channel System, Class IV Integrated Receiver Factory Tow Hitch, Sliding Bed Extender, Leather Seats
Drive Type: RWD
Safety Features: Front Seat Active Head Restraints, Electronic Brake force Distribution (EBD), Vehicle Security System (VSS), Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 13,642
Power Options: Dual Zone AC Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Graphite Blue
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Cylinders: 6

I have a 2013 Nissan Frontier SV with only 13642 miles on it. The truck has a 6 cyl. 4.0L engine with a 5-speed auto transmission. The truck is very clean and in Brand New Condition. It was barely used No pets/ None smoker. 

The truck is very well maintained and in excellent condition. The Truck did encounter minor front end collision and was professionally repaired to its original factory specifications. Also has been driven over 1,000 miles after the repair and everything works good. The Truck is valued at 26,760 KBB. I'm asking 22,700 or best offer. Call at 941 457 6469.

Nissan Frontier for Sale

Auto Services in Florida

Wildwood Tire Co. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 200 E Gulf Atlantic Hwy, Oxford
Phone: (352) 748-1739

Wholesale Performance Transmission Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 4899 34th St N, Pass-A-Grille
Phone: (727) 526-0120

Wally`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 15519 US Highway 441 Ste 102, Minneola
Phone: (352) 357-0576

Universal Body Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 1136 E 9th St, Dinsmore
Phone: (904) 257-1386

Tony On Wheels Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 8600 SW 8th St, Pinecrest-Postal-Store
Phone: (305) 264-8189

Tom`s Upholstery ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 20 S 5th St, Eloise
Phone: (863) 422-8703

Auto blog

Nissan won't downsize the next Armada

Wed, 28 Aug 2013

The Nissan Armada is aptly named, because in relative automotive terms, it's not just the size of a ship - it's the size of a whole fleet. And that, according to reports, isn't about to change.
While many of the larger SUVs on the market are gradually being phased out or replaced by smaller crossovers, Nissan apparently plans on keeping the Armada right where it is. And that means a large, truck-based, eight-passenger colossus, because there are buyers out there who expect no less and Nissan isn't about to lose them to the likes of the Toyota Sequoia, Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator, or a General Motors lineup that includes the Chevy Suburban and Tahoe, GMC Yukon and Cadillac Escalade.
That doesn't mean that the next Armada - which Edmunds expects will arrive in 2015 or 2016 - will be immune to constricting environmental regulations, so Nissan will have to get creative. A vehicle the size of the Armada has all the aerodynamic efficiency of the side of a barn, but Nissan is reportedly aiming to streamline that in order to boost efficiency, for starters.

NHTSA opens investigation into 130k Nissan Versas for breaking springs

Tue, May 19 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened a preliminary evaluation into a suspension problem that could affect an estimated 130,000 Nissan Versas from 2008-2010. According to the government agency's documentation (here as a PDF), there have been 93 complaints of the front coil springs fracturing while driving in these vehicles. Based on reports so far, it appears to NHTSA that this problem can happen at any speed and without warning. When the spring breaks, the pieces can also puncture a tire or brake line. A preliminary evaluation sets out to investigate "the scope, frequency and safety-related consequence" of the potential problem. According to a portion of a statement from the automaker to Autoblog, "Nissan is cooperating fully to answer the agency's questions regarding this issue in a timely manner." INVESTIGATION Subject : Front Coil Spring Fracture Date Investigation Opened: MAY 13, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15019 Component(s): SUSPENSION All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) NISSAN VERSA 2008-2010 Details Manufacturer: Nissan North America, Inc. SUMMARY: The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received 93 complaints (VOQs) alleging incidents of front suspension coil spring fracture in model year (MY) 2008 through 2010 Nissan Versa passenger cars. Preliminary analysis of the complaints indicates that the coil spring failures occur without warning and can happen at any speed. One complaint (VOQ #10663102) reported the passenger-side coil spring fractured while traveling at 65 mph and caused a sudden tire failure by cutting the inner sidewall 360 degrees. Another complaint ( VOQ #10680740) reported the passenger-side coil spring fractured while traveling 40 mph and result in tire puncture and brake line failure. ODI has also received EWR field report information relating to coil spring failures in the subject vehicles. A Preliminary Evaluation has been opened to assess the scope, frequency and safety-related consequence of the alleged defect.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.