Lincoln > LS

2002 Lincoln Ls 3.9l V8. Sports Model. Loaded! Needs Fuel Pump! on 2040-cars

Year:2002 Mileage:161000 Color: Gold /
Gold

Location:

Livingston, Texas, United States

2002 Lincoln LS 3.9L V8. Sports Model. Loaded! Needs Fuel Pump!, image 1

2002 Lincoln LS 3.9L V8. Sports Model. Loaded! Needs Fuel Pump!, image 2

2002 Lincoln LS 3.9L V8. Sports Model. Loaded! Needs Fuel Pump!, image 3

2002 Lincoln LS 3.9L V8. Sports Model. Loaded! Needs Fuel Pump!, image 4

2002 Lincoln LS 3.9L V8. Sports Model. Loaded! Needs Fuel Pump!, image 5

2002 Lincoln LS 3.9L V8. Sports Model. Loaded! Needs Fuel Pump!, image 6

2002 Lincoln LS 3.9L V8. Sports Model. Loaded! Needs Fuel Pump!, image 7

Advertising:

Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.9L V8
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller

VIN: 1LNHM87AX2Y607415 Year: 2002
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Lincoln
Model: LS
Trim: Base Sedan 4-Door
Options: Sunroof, Leather Seats, CD Player
Drive Type: Rear Wheel Drive
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 161,000
Exterior Color: Gold
Interior Color: Gold
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty

Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...

Nice, clean 2002 Lincoln LS 3.9 L V8. NEEDS FUEL PUMP. LOW RESERVE! Top of the line sports model. Every option. Power moonroof, power everything, dual zone A/C, 6 disc CD changer, 17" wheels. I bought this car about a year ago from a dealer in Grand Prairie, TX. I was commuting back and forth to Livingston, TX weekly. During one of the trips, the thermostat housing blew. I had it towed back home to Livingston, and found that it was not unusual for this model. The part appears to be metal, but it is plastic. As suggested on the internet, I replaced it with the aluminum Jaguar part (same engine in Jaguar 4.0 and Thunderbird). After replacing the part, I test drove the car to town (2 miles) and found that the OTHER cooling tube had a crack in it as well. This is a pressurized system, so that had to be replaced also (it has been replaced). I ordered the part, but then had to leave the country for 6 months. When I returned, the car would turn over, but not start. I tried starting fluid and it started right up but would not stay running. I started process of elimination. I checked out the fuses (fuel pump fuse was blown). I replaced the fuse, and it did not blow again, but still no go. I swapped out all the relays and diodes that handle the fuel pump. No go. Then I replaced the fuel filter. At that time I tested for fuel and verified that no fuel was getting to the engine. Someone came and checked the computer codes, and it said bad fuel pump driver control module. On this car, the DCM is located inside the rear electronics module, so I replaced that also. No go. I verified that power was getting to the fuel pump connector, so I finally pulled the fuel pump. The fuel lines did not come out as they were supposed to, so I had to cut them. I had located a fuel pump at a wrecking yard in Lufkin, but when it was pulled, it was badly rusted and unusable. I have since purchased a new fuel pump (only), but it has not been installed and the cartridge that the pump fits into may need to be replaced, or parts of the two I have combined into one. So as it stands right now, the fuel pump is out of the car, I have an EXTRA rear electronic module, two fuel pumps in various states of disrepair plus a new pump. I purchased a second set of fuel lines and have snaked them into position, but they kinked at various times during the install and may need to be replaced again also. The car also has two new front tires. The fuel pumps (there are two) are easily accessible under the rear seat. I don't have the time or money to continue with this saga at the moment. I've done most of the work, and have well over $5,000 in the car, but the high bidder can bring a car trailer and can get it out of here. Clean title in my name. Inspection sticker expired the end of February, tags are good through the end of April. 161,000 miles. Feel free to request additional pictures of any part of the vehicle. There are a few door dings, some cracking of the drivers seat, a scrape to the area around the rear left tail light (which was replaced), and a few evidences of smokers in the car. I have the original manuals for the car, and it appears to have had only one or two owners. See the vehicle history report for verification. I work 12 hour days and just don't have time for this. Come and get it! Good Bidding! $500 deposit due within 24 hours of winning the auction, and full payment due within 7 days at time of pickup. VEHICLE SOLD AS-IS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, ASK THEM BEFORE BIDDING!

Lincoln LS for Sale

Auto Services in Texas

Zeke`s Inspections Plus ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Battery Storage, Battery Supplies

Address: 1006 S Frazier St, Hufsmith

Phone: (936) 441-3500

Value Import ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers

Address: 1210 N Wayside Dr, Winchester

Phone: (866) 595-6470

USA Car Care ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts

Address: 202 Cypresswood Dr, Klein

Phone: (281) 355-5800

USA Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting

Address: 12113 Garland Rd, Rowlett

Phone: (972) 247-4098

Uresti Jesse Camper Sales ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Accessories, Transport Trailers

Address: 13070 Interstate 35 S, Atascosa

Phone: (210) 623-2411

Universal Village Auto Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers

Address: 6223 Richmond Ave, West-University-Place

Phone: (832) 320-9600

Auto blog

Ford Mustang, F-150, Expedition, and Lincoln Navigator recalled

Wed, Apr 27 2016

The Basics: Ford will recall 201,900 examples of the 2011-2012 F-150, 2012 Expedition, 2012 Mustang, and 2012 Lincoln Navigator. The affected vehicles have the 6R80 transmission. Of the total, there are 84,000 of them in the United States and 17,900 in Canada. The Problem: The output speed sensor on the vehicle's transmission lead frame can force the gearbox to downshift into first gear. If this happens at high speed, it could cause the rear tires to slide or lock up. Injuries/Deaths: There are no reported injuries, but Ford know of three accidents related to this problem. The Fix: Dealers will update the powertrain control module software to eliminate the problem, and they'll also replace the transmission lead frame. If You Own One: Ford will begin notifying affected customers by mail on May 23. Related Video: FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUES THREE SAFETY RECALLS AND TWO SAFETY COMPLIANCE RECALLS IN NORTH AMERICA DEARBORN, Mich., April 27, 2016 – Ford Motor Company is issuing three safety recalls and two safety compliance recalls in North America. Details are as follows: Ford issues safety recall and customer satisfaction program for certain 2011-2012 Ford F-150, and 2012 Ford Expedition, Ford Mustang and Lincoln Navigator vehicles in North America to update powertrain control module software and inspect for certain diagnostic trouble codes Ford is issuing a safety recall for approximately 202,000 2011-2012 Ford F-150, and 2012 Ford Expedition, Ford Mustang and Lincoln Navigator vehicles for a potential issue with the output speed sensor on the vehicle's transmission lead frame. Under certain conditions, the transmission controls could force a temporary downshift into first gear. Depending on the speed of the vehicle at the time of the downshift, the driver could experience an abrupt speed reduction that could cause the rear tires to slide or lock up. This condition could result in loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash. Ford is aware of three reports of accidents and no injuries related to this condition. Affected vehicles are equipped with a 6R80 transmission and include certain 2011-2012 Ford F-150 vehicles built at Dearborn Truck Plant and Kansas City Assembly Plant, Aug. 19, 2011 through March 9, 2012; 2012 Ford Expedition vehicles built at Kentucky Truck Plant, Aug. 19, 2011 through Dec. 19, 2011; Ford Mustang vehicles built at Flat Rock Assembly Plant, Aug. 19, 2011 through Feb.

Ford's struggles in China continue as November sales drop 8 percent

Mon, Dec 11 2017

Ford's sales in China fell 8 percent in November from a year ago, following a 5 percent decline in October, the U.S. automaker said on Monday. The firm's sales in the first 11 months of the year totaled 1.06 million vehicles, down 6 percent from the same period a year ago. Ford's China sales growth has lagged behind rivals in the world's top auto market this year, with the carmaker now looking to overhaul its strategy to revive growth in China under new chief executive Jim Hackett. Among other moves, the review of its China operations will likely see Ford focus on segments such as electric cars and electric commercial vans, with China encouraging to help clean up its polluted and congested city centers. Ford is looking to roll out more new-energy vehicles for China and is planning to experiment with a more direct selling approach in a partnership with Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. Reporting By Norihiko ShirouzuRelated Video:

2020 Ford Escape, Lincoln Corsair ace crash tests, earn Top Safety Pick from IIHS

Fri, Nov 15 2019

The redesigned 2020 Ford Escape and its platform-mate, the 2020 Lincoln Corsair, have both just completed their bout of crash tests at the hands of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, and while they did not emerge unscathed, they did come away with the agency's Top Safety Pick Award. One caveat: The rating only applies to the Escape equipped with the available LED headlights, which were deemed Acceptable. Similarly, the Corsair needs the available curve-adaptive LED headlights, also rated Acceptable, in order to achieve Top Safety Pick. The Escape's standard halogen headlights scored only a Marginal rating, while the Corsair's base LED headlights were deemed Poor due to glare. Those low headlight ratings knock the vehicles out of contention for Top Safety Pick. Had either vehicle offered headlights able to achieve a Good rating, that would have been enough to get them the agency's Top Safety Pick+ rating. Outside of their headlights, the 2020 Escape and Corsair acquitted themselves well. The Escape saw a big improvement in the difficult small-overlap front crash test, going from a Poor result in the previous generation to Good with the new one. The Corsair performed identically, and both achieved Good ratings in all six crash tests. The IIHS also tests automatic emergency-braking systems, and the standard and optional systems in the Escape and the Corsair both earned Superior ratings.