2015 Kia Sorento Ex on 2040-cars
202 South Goose Creek Blvd, Goose Creek, South Carolina, United States
Engine:3.3L V6 24V GDI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5XYKU4A77FG574503
Stock Num: K404
Make: Kia
Model: Sorento EX
Year: 2015
Exterior Color: Satin Metal
Interior Color: Black
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
At Stokes Kia, YOU'RE #1! Wow! Where do I start?! Looking for an amazing value on a wonderful 2015 Kia Sorento? Well, this is IT! This Sorento's engine never skips a beat. It's nice being able to slip that key into the ignition and not having to cross your fingers every time. As you do your comparison shopping, you will see Stokes Kia offer some of the best values in the market. We will provide you a Carfax, Comprehensive Vehicle Inspection, and how we arrived at the price. We may not be the lowest, but if you want to know who is we will show you that too. Call or Stop by Contact Stokes Kia at 888-823-7294 in Charleston, South Carolina. Excludes tax, tag, registration and title and includes $399.50 Administrative Fee. Prices do not include destination charges, dealer add-ons, tax, license, and does include $399.50 Administration Fees. Come see our exciting new designs, largest SPECIAL selection.EVERY NEW CAR AT INVOICE, PLUS YOU GET THE REBATE...Call today #888-823-7294 to find out more!!!
Kia Sorento for Sale
2015 kia sorento limited(US $41,380.00)
2015 kia sorento lx(US $25,460.00)
2015 kia sorento lx(US $27,425.00)
2015 kia sorento lx(US $29,125.00)
2015 kia sorento sx(US $37,980.00)
2015 kia sorento limited(US $41,075.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
Wingard Towing Service ★★★★★
Wilkins Motor Company ★★★★★
USA Tire & Auto Care ★★★★★
Sumter County Customs ★★★★★
Stroman Welding & Auto Repair ★★★★★
Spearman Brothers Collision Repair & Refinishing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Kia takes the wraps off new Sorento
Mon, 11 Aug 2014We've seen the spy shots (twice) and we've seen the teaser images, but now Kia has finally revealed the finished form of its upcoming new Sorento crossover.
Taking some styling cues from the Kia Cross GT concept from the 2013 Chicago Auto Show, but with better proportions, the new Sorento packs a more pronounced grille in an altogether more aggressive (though not necessarily better-looking) front end than the model it replaces. Sheet metal is more sculpted all around, and despite the wrap-around taillights, the rear end looks familiar.
The new Sorento stretches 3.7-inches longer overall, on a 3-inch longer wheelbase, but sits half an inch lower, promising more interior space and of course updated equipment and features. The Eco Dynamics badge on the tailgate suggests the availability of green tech like stop/start ignition and such. Kia will reveal the new Sorento in Korea later this month ahead of its debut at the Paris Motor Show in October.
Next-generation Kia Sorento snapped undergoing testing
Wed, 04 Sep 2013Kia has been busy - a refreshed Sorento just arrived in showrooms for the 2014 model year and the Korean manufacturer is already out undergoing advanced testing in the next-generation model. How, pray tell, do we know how far along testing is? Notice any cladding, or coverings, aside from the regular vinyl camo? Right.
Our predictive talents aside, there are still a lot of questions about the next Sorento. We don't have much to go on with the technical specs, although we'll be thunderstruck if there isn't some form of the Hyundai/Kia 2.0-liter turbo under hood. Our spies report that this new model is somewhat larger than the current Sorento, hinting that it might be riding atop the same platform as the long-wheelbase Hyundai Santa Fe. That could indicate an available V6 model, as well. Judging by the profile views, we'd bet our bottom dollar this is a three-row model.
The conflicting nature of a refreshed Sorento hitting dealers and an advanced prototype out testing in Europe makes it difficult to pin down a date for the third-generation CUV's debut. We doubt we'll be seeing the new Sorento before the end of the year - a 2014 debut with a 2015 on-sale date just seems more likely in light of the newness of the refreshed model.
U.S. appeals court preserves $210M Hyundai-Kia fuel economy class settlement
Thu, Jun 6 2019A U.S. appeals court restored a $210 million nationwide class-action settlement for hundreds of thousands of owners of Hyundai Motor Co and Kia Motors Corp vehicles whose fuel economy estimates were inflated. By an 8-3 vote on Thursday, in a case closely watched by class-action lawyers, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California, said vehicle owners had enough in common to let them settle as a group. It also rejected arguments by owners opposed to the settlement that the claims process was too burdensome, and that lawyers for the class had colluded with the automakers to extract a "sweetheart deal" that undervalued their claims. The case began after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found flaws in Hyundai's and Kia's testing procedures, prompting the automakers to lower fuel efficiency estimates for about 900,000 vehicles from the 2011, 2012 and 2013 model years. Lawyers for objecting drivers had no immediate comment. Hyundai said it was grateful for the decision. Kia and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The decision by Circuit Judge Jacqueline Nguyen upheld a settlement approved in June 2015 by U.S. District Judge George Wu in Los Angeles. Wu "made careful findings, which the objectors here largely do not challenge, and which more than support the judgment," Nguyen wrote. The decision reversed a divided three-judge 9th Circuit panel's January 2018 rejection of the settlement and decertification of the class action. That panel said Wu failed to assess whether differences in state laws prevented certification of a nationwide class. It also said used car owners should have been excluded because it was unclear whether they had relied on the South Korean automakers' fuel economy claims. Lawyers had said it would become much harder to obtain nationwide settlements if the panel ruling stood. Nguyen had dissented from the panel ruling. Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta, who wrote it, dissented on Thursday. Ikuta accused the majority of failing to determine what law should apply to the nationwide class or how the settlement, and thus attorneys' fees, should be valued. "The majority's failure to correct these errors may be beneficial for the class action bar, but it detracts from compliance with Supreme Court precedent," Ikuta wrote. The 9th Circuit covers nine western U.S. states, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.
