1995 Jeep Wrangler Rio Grande Sport Utility 2-door 2.5l Automatic on 2040-cars
Delta, Pennsylvania, United States
Body Type:Sport Utility
Engine:2.5L 150Cu. In. l4 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
Interior Color: Tan
Make: Jeep
Number of Cylinders: 4
Model: Wrangler
Trim: Rio Grande Sport Utility 2-Door
Drive Type: 4WD
Mileage: 143,000
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Exterior Color: Green
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, Convertible
1995 Jeep Wrangler 4x4. 2.5 litre 4 cylinder, automatic transmission. Has 143,000 miles. Body has little to no rust. Frame is solid. Floors are solid, small patched area at the drain holes on both front floorboards. Carpet was removed before we bought it. Had a new bikini top on it when we bought it and this will be included. We added the hard top which is in very good condition. It originally had a hard top but the rear window was broken out and to replace the window assembly was the same price as the new top. The tailgate has a little bend in it, the spare tire rack was damaged when we got it.That is probably what happened to the rear window. I removed the rack and added the third brake light as it was required for inspection. She liked the jeep better without the rack on the back for visibility. The spare tire is included. This was my daughters first car. She drove it for about 1 year until a Toyota pick-up we had been trying to purchase became available. It has been very dependable for her. I drove it to work for several weeks with no issues. Gas mileage is 14-15 mpgs around town. Not sure highway mileage. The throttle position sensor was just replaced. The temperature sensor was also just replaced. Have a new, never installed crank position sensor that will be included. Was told to keep a spare one in the glove box for emergencies. Cost $60 at Kunkles in Bel-Air. Jeep is currently inspected through November of 2013. The engine runs well and the trans shifts as it should. The 4 wheel drive works with no issues. The interior is in pretty good shape for the year. The drivers seat bottom has some cracking at the seams on the side. The other seats are very nice. The carpet is in place on the back wheel wells. The rear window wiper is functional but needs a wiper blade. The windshield wipers were installed before it got inspected. Tires are about 50% tread. The jeep is all stock and is in better than average condition. It passed inspection with no problems or issues other than a loose muffler clamp that makes a rattle at certain engine rpms. Overall it is very nice. Mileage when purchased was 134000. We bought it from a local dealer for $3500 plus tax and title, and paid $450 for the hard top. Jeep was awesome and very fun to drive. Would make an excellent first vehicle. My daughter passed her drivers licence test on the first try in this Jeep. Hope the good luck continues with the next lucky owner. Thanks for looking.
Jeep Wrangler for Sale
2009 jeep wrangler sport rubicon navigation keyless remote sat. radio 1 owner
2006 jeep wrangler unlimited 6 cyl, 6-spd, 4 inch suspension lift, new 33's(US $13,950.00)
Repairable rebuildable salvage ez rear hit hard top 6 speed excellent save big(US $21,900.00)
2000 jeep wrangler sport
2013 jeep wrangler 4wd sport - free delivery/airfare/ipad(US $23,495.00)
2011 jeep wrangler sport utility 2-door 3.8l
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
X-Cel Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★
Wynne`s Express Lube & Auto ★★★★★
Westwood Tire and Automotive Inc. ★★★★★
Waynes Truck & Auto Service ★★★★★
Triple Nickel Auto Parts ★★★★★
Top Gun Auto Painting & Bdywrk ★★★★★
Auto blog
Car Club USA: Louisiana Mudfest
Tue, Jun 16 2015There's nothing quite like mudding. Big tires, huge power, and crazy-wild gearheads that like to throw down on a mud pit almost as much as a thirty rack of Coors. In the latest, and some might argue greatest yet episode of Car Club USA, we head to Louisiana to throw some dirt at Mudfest. As Louisiana's one and only Mouth of the South puts it, "If you don't mud ride... go to Texas I guess." Joining The Mouth and friendly rivals The Most Hated Mud Sluts, we dive in. Beyond the obvious V8 blasting and tractor-tire spinning, those who know best describe Mudfest as, "Good cooking, good friends, good fun, and a lot of partying." It's a motorsport spectacle unlike any you're likely to find up North or out West, though no less impressive to behold. Follow along with the fun, the impromptu drag racing, the trash talking, and the mechanical madness. And find out why, at Mudfest, "if we don't tear it up, we ain't done it right." Each Car Club USA episode features a different car club or event from across the US, where passionate owner communities gather to share automotive experiences and embark on incredible adventures. From Main Street cruises to off-road trails, catch all the latest car club activity on Autoblog. Chevrolet Ford Jeep RAM Truck Off-Road Vehicles Car Club USA Videos autoblog black
2018 Nissan Kicks vs other tiny crossovers: How they compare on paper
Wed, May 9 2018Update: As we now have now driven the 2018 Nissan Kicks and have all the specs and figures available, we thought it was time to update this comparison post. The data chart has been updated with final Kicks information as well as changes to competitors made for 2019. Anyone else have "Pumped Up Kicks" by Foster the People stuck in their heads? Well, you do now. I couldn't be the only one. Anyway, the 2018 Nissan Kicks is a thing. It replaces the Nissan Juke, which Mr. Stocksdale thought was a bad idea and Mr. Myself thought was a smart idea. Nevertheless, neither of us were especially pumped up by the Kicks. However, the majority of car buyers are all about SUVs, and this littlest segment of them has been multiplying like Tribbles in the past few years. The Juke was one of the first of these subcompact crossovers, but it was probably too oddball for a mainstream audience (not to mention inefficient) and never really caught on. Newer competitors certainly didn't help. Well, to see how the Kicks compares to those very competitors, lets fire up the Autoblog Comparo Generator 3000 (TM). Specifically, we'll be looking at those subcompact crossovers with similarly small dimensions, especially low prices and/or a disinclination to offering all-wheel drive. We're talking about the Nissan Kicks vs the Toyota C-HR, Hyundai Kona, Kia Soul, Honda HR-V and Jeep Renegade. Now, if you're interested in literally the exact opposite SUV segment, check out our recent Mercedes G-Class comparo. Otherwise, on to the spreadsheet: Dimensions and passenger space In terms of exterior dimensions, the new Kicks is right smack in the middle of the segment. It's virtually the same as the Honda HR-V, yet manages to eek out a few extra cubic feet of cargo space behind its raised back seat. The Honda and its "Magic Seat" still beats it in terms of maximum capacity, but it sure is close. The Kia Soul has the biggest maximum number, but that's largely the result of being a box. Its small behind-the-back-seat cargo number is likely a better indicator of how much you'll be dealing with on a day-to-day basis. And in that day-to-day way, the Kicks is excellent. Backseat legroom seems to be a Kicks downside, as all but the C-HR surpass it. (Seriously, it's almost impressive how large the C-HR is on the outside but cramped inside.) However, the Kicks' tall greenhouse not only allows for ample headroom, but seats that are mounted high off the ground.
What would you drive in 1985?
Wed, May 6 2020Bereft of live baseball games to watch, I've turned to the good ship YouTube to watch classic games. While watching the 1985 American League Championship Series last night, several of the broadcast's commercials made its way into the original VHS recording, including those for cars. "Only 8.8% financing on a 1985 Ford Tempo!" What a deal! That got me thinking: what would I drive in 1985? It sure wouldn't be a Tempo. Or an IROC-Z, for that matter, despite what my Photoshopped 1980s self would indicate in the picture above. I posed this question to my fellow Autobloggists. Only one could actually drive back then, I was only 2 and a few editors weren't even close to being born. Here are our choices, which were simply made with the edict of "Come on, man, be realistic." West Coast Editor James Riswick: OK, I started this, I'll go first. I like coupes today, so I'm pretty sure I'd drive one back then. I definitely don't see myself driving some badge-engineered GM thing from 1985, and although a Honda Prelude has a certain appeal, I must admit that something European would likely be in order. A BMW maybe? No, I'm too much a contrarian for that. The answer is therefore a 1985 Saab 900 Turbo 3-Door, which is not only a coupe but a hatchback, too. If I could scrounge up enough Reagan-era bucks for the ultra-cool SPG model, that would be rad. The 900 Turbo pictured, which was for auction on Bring a Trailer a few years ago, came with plum-colored Bokhara Red, and you're damn sure I would've had me one of those. Nevermind 1985, I'd probably drive this thing today. Associate Editor Byron Hurd: I'm going to go with the 1985.5 Ford Mustang SVO, AKA the turbocharged Fox Body that everybody remembers but nobody drives. The mid-year update to the SVO bumped the power up from 175 ponies (yeah, yeah) to 205, making it almost as powerful (on paper, anyway) as the V8-powered GT models offered in the same time frame. I chose this particular car because it's a bit of a time capsule and, simultaneously, a reminder that all things are cyclical. Here we are, 35 years later, and 2.3-liter turbocharged Mustangs are a thing again. Who would have guessed?