Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1995 Jeep Wrangler Rio Grande on 2040-cars

Year:1995 Mileage:140000 Color: Green /
 Gold
Location:

Canastota, New York, United States

Canastota, New York, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.5L 150Cu. In. l4 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
VIN: 1J4FY19P0SP208862 Year: 1995
Number of Cylinders: 4
Make: Jeep
Model: Wrangler
Trim: Rio Grande Sport Utility 2-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Drive Type: 4WD
Mileage: 140,000
Number of Doors: 2
Exterior Color: Green
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Gold
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

FOR SALE 1995 JEEP WRANGLER RIO GRANDE, I DO NOT HAVE THE SOFT TOP FOR IT. CONDITION IS FAIR, THIS VEHICLE HAS A HOLE IN THE DRIVER SIDE FLOOR WHERE IT RUSTED OUT. SOME RUST IN THE REAR OF THE CORNER AS WELL. HAS NOT BEEN DRIVEN FOR NEARLY ONE YEAR. BEFORE IT WAS TAKEN OFF THE ROAD I REPLACED THE CLUTCH. SOME BRAKE WORK, SHOCKS, AND RADIATOR. THE ENGINE RUNS GOOD AND BURNED NO OIL.THIS VEHICLE NEEDS SOME BODY WORK TO BE DRIVEN, OR USED FOR A PARTS CAR. ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME .   THANKS FOR LOOKING.

Auto Services in New York

Westchester Toyota ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, New Truck Dealers
Address: 2167 Central Park Ave, Hastings-On-Hudson
Phone: (914) 779-8700

Vision Dodge Chrysler Jeep ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 920 Panorama Trl S, Union-Hill
Phone: (585) 385-5700

Village Automotive Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Auto Transmission
Address: 61 N Country Rd, Wading-River
Phone: (631) 751-3200

TNT Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies
Address: 142 Ralph St, Harrison
Phone: (973) 302-4099

Sterling Autobody Centers ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1024 W Ridge Rd, North-Greece
Phone: (585) 621-2870

Sencore Enterprises ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 3818 State Route 31, Phelps
Phone: (315) 597-2886

Auto blog

Land Rover Defender V8 vs. Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392 | V8 4x4s square off on paper

Thu, Feb 25 2021

Land Rover pulled the sheet off its 2022 Defender on Wednesday, introducing another high-performance V8 to the off-road segment. This time, it's a 5.0-liter, supercharged V8 boasting 518 horsepower. It will be available in both the Defender 90 and 110 models. In the former, Land Rover says it can crack off a 0-60 run in just 4.9 seconds on its way to a top speed of 149 mph. The long-wheelbase 110 will be a bit slower, but "slow" probably isn't the right adjective to use here at all.  But Land Rover isn't the only automaker offering a high-performance variant of its off-road SUV. While Jeep may have been sneered at for presenting the 2021 Wrangler Rubicon 392 on the heels of the 2021 Ford Bronco's introduction, it starts to make a lot more sense in this context. There's reportedly a high-output Bronco on the way, too, so call Jeep the dinosaur of the group all you want, but you can't put a price on being first. Well, you can, actually, but that's not the point.  Thankfully, both Land Rover and Jeep have provided enough specs for us to rough out a comparison chart. Since the Rubicon 392 is offered only in four-door guise, we're looking at the long-wheelbase Defender 110 as its direct competitor here. Have a look: There are a few caveats to mention off the top. For starters, we don't have an official curb weight for the V8-powered Defender yet, as Land Rover has not finalized its U.S. specs. We used the European figures (as provided by a spokesperson), which we expect to be accurate within about 50 pounds. The 0-60 time provided by Land Rover was for the Defender 90, which is smaller and somewhat lighter than the 110. When equipped with the inline-6, the Defender 110 is about a tenth of a second slower to 60 than the Defender 90, so we figure it should be roughly the same for the V8.  While the Defender has nearly 50 horsepower on the Wrangler, that advantage disappears thanks to the Land Rover V8's monster weight penalty, which will fall somewhere between 600 and 700 pounds depending on equipment. Yikes. On the flip side, however, the Land Rover has the edge in top speed, and it's not even close. Chalk that up to the tires, we suspect. We know for a fact that the Rubicon 392's all-terrains dictate its speed limiter; Jeep's own engineers told us as much. This could make for a (hypothetically) interesting drag race, as the Jeep's advantage off the line may evaporate once triple digits come into play.

FCA CEO Mike Manley will take undefined new role after PSA merger

Wed, Dec 18 2019

MILAN — Fiat Chrysler Chief Executive Mike Manley will remain with the new group set to result from a planned merger with French rival PSA-Peugeot, Chairman John Elkann said on Wednesday. In a letter to Fiat Chrysler (FCA) employees on the day the two companies announced a binding agreement for a $50 billion tie-up to create the world's fourth-largest carmaker, Elkann said he was "delighted" that the combined group would be led by current PSA CEO Carlos Tavares. "And Mike Manley, who has led FCA with huge energy, commitment and success over the past year, will be there alongside him," he said. He did not say what position Manley would hold. Elkann — who will chair the new group — said there was still much to be done to complete the merger. "Over the coming months we must work tirelessly and determinedly to fulfill all the approval requirements needed to finalize the commitment we have signed," he said. Related Video:     Hirings/Firings/Layoffs Chrysler Dodge Fiat Jeep RAM Citroen Peugeot FCA PSA merger Mike Manley carlos tavares

Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota

Wed, Feb 25 2015

It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study