2011 Jeep Patriot - 4-door -2.4l I4 Dohc 16v Dual Vvt- 4 Cylinder Gas- 85k Miles on 2040-cars
CENTREVILLE, IL, United States
Engine:4-Cylinder Gas - 2.4L I4 DOHC 16V Dual VVT
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gas
For Sale By:Dealer
Exterior Color: Silver
Make: Jeep
Number of Cylinders: 4
Model: Patriot
Trim: Sport Utility 4-Door
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Drive Type: F
Mileage: 85,700
Jeep Patriot for Sale
2012 jeep patriot sport suv 4x4 low miles!!!(US $18,995.00)
2009 jeep patriot limited sport utility 4-door 2.4l
2007 jeep patriot 4x4 leather all power clean carfax buy now with 1 yr warranty(US $8,995.00)
2012 jeep patriot latitude altitude 4x4(US $22,950.00)
2012 jeep patriot latitude altitude 4x4(US $22,950.00)
10 patriot 4x2 sport, 2.0l 4 cylinder, auto cvt, pwr equip, cruise,clean 1 owner
Auto Services in Illinois
Vega Auto Repair ★★★★★
Ultimate Deals Vehicle Sales ★★★★★
Tredup`s Inc ★★★★★
Terry`s Service ★★★★★
Stan`s Repair Service ★★★★★
St Louis Dent Company ★★★★★
Auto blog
Watch this 650-hp Hennessey Jeep Grand Cherokee go from 0-60 in 3.9 seconds
Tue, 14 May 2013Hennessey Performance Engineering has created an HPE650 package for the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT fitted with the 6.4-liter Hemi engine. When it leaves the showroom floor it has 470 horsepower and gets from 0-60 miles per hour in 4.8 seconds. When it leaves Hennessey's garage floor after the upgrade it has 650 horsepower - 530 hp at the wheels, according to Hennessey - and gets to 60 mph in 3.9 seconds on its way to running the quarter-mile in 12.6 seconds.
There's more than just a Roots-type supercharger bolt-on, with ported cylinder heads and high-flow headers among the many changes made to the engine. You can watch this pre-2014 facelift silver model prove its spec sheet on the drag strip in the video below.
2018 Jeep Wrangler Spied Looking More Aerodynamic | Autoblog Minute
Sat, May 7 2016This week we got an early look at the 2018 Jeep Wrangler. So what we see in these spy shots, or at least we think we see, is a vehicle that?s going to use more aluminum in a bid to reduce weight and thus improve fuel economy.
Auto Mergers and Acquisitions: Suicide or salvation?
Tue, Sep 8 2015We love the Moses figure. A savior riding in from stage right with the ideas, the smarts, and the scrappiness to put things right. Alan Mullaly. Carroll Shelby. Lee Iacocca. Andrew Carnegie. Steve Jobs. Elon Musk. Bart Simpson. Sergio Marchionne does not likely view himself with Moses-like optics, but the CEO of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles recently gave a remarkable, perhaps prophetic interview with Automotive News about his interest and the inevitability of merging with a potential automotive partner like General Motors. Marchionne has been overtly public about his notion that GM must merge with FCA. For a bit of context, GM sold 9.9 million vehicles in 2014, posting $2.8 billion in net income, while FCA sold 4.75 million units and earned $2.4 billion in net income, painting a very rosy FCA earnings-to-sales picture. But that's not the entire picture. Most people in the auto industry still remember the trainwreck that was the DaimlerChrysler "merger" written in what turned out to be sand in 1998. It proved to be a master class in how not to fuse two companies, two cultures, two continents, and two management teams. Oh, it worked for the two individuals at both helms pre-merger. They got silly rich. And the industry itself was in a misty romance at the time with mergers and acquisitions. BMW bought Rolls-Royce. Volkswagen Group bought Bentley, Bugatti, and Lamborghini, putting all three brands into their rightful place in both products and positioning. No marriages there, so no false pretense. Finally, Nissan and Renault got married in 1999. A successful marriage requires several rare elements in this atmosphere of gas fumes and power lust. But a successful marriage requires several rare elements in this atmosphere of gas fumes and power lust, the principle part being honesty. Daimler and Chrysler lied to each other. The heads of each unit, the product planners, and finance all presented their then-current and long-range forecasts to each other with less-than-forthright accuracy. Daimler was the far greater equal and no one from the Chrysler side enjoyed that. The cultures were entirely different, too, and little was done to bridge that gap. Which brings me back to the present overtures by Marchionne to GM. "There are varying degrees of hugs," Marchionne stated in the Automotive News piece. "I can hug you nicely, I can hug you tightly, I can hug you like a bear, I can really hug you." Seriously?









