2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited Hemi on 2040-cars
Torrington, Connecticut, United States
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.7L Hemi
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Jeep
Model: Grand Cherokee
Trim: Limited Sport Utility 4-Door
Options: Navigation, Premium 17" Chrome Rims, DVD Player, Bose Sound System, Leather and Suede Seats, Front and Rear Seat Heaters, Sunroof, 4-Wheel Drive, Leather Seats, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Drive Type: 4x4 II
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 55,600
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Black And Tan
Warranty: 100,000 Miles
Number of Cylinders: 8
Beautiful One-owner 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited, 5.7L Hemi V8 including all factory options available in 2010.
Jeep Grand Cherokee for Sale
6.4l navigation luxury gr ii srt high perf audio adaptive cruise 1 owner 17k mi(US $52,991.00)
2009 red jeep cherokee laredo automatic
Jeep grand cherokee limited
2008 jeep grand cherokee srt8 - queteux(US $28,500.00)
1997 jeep grand cherokee laredo sport utility 4-door 4.0l
2006 jeep grand cherokee srt8 6.1l sport utility 4-door(US $24,999.00)
Auto Services in Connecticut
Valenti Motors Inc ★★★★★
Tires Plus Wheels ★★★★★
Story Brothers Inc ★★★★★
South Valley Auto ★★★★★
People`s Auto LLC ★★★★★
Pandolfe`s Auto Parts ★★★★★
Auto blog
2019 Jeep Grand Wagoneer Spied | Autoblog Minute
Wed, Oct 19 2016Photo leak gives us our first glimpse at the 2019 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. Jeep SUV Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video 5g Connectivity supercar transportation rendering mobility
Stellantis suspends vehicle production in Russia
Tue, Apr 19 2022MILAN - Stellantis on Tuesday said it was suspending production at its Russian plant due to logistical difficulties and sanctions imposed on Moscow. The world's fourth-largest automaker, which produced and sold the Peugeot, Citro¸n, Opel, Jeep, and Fiat brands in Russia, has just 1% of the country's car market. It runs a van-making plant in Kaluga, around 125 miles (201 kilometres) southeast of Moscow, co-owned with Japanese carmaker Mitsubishi, which halted production at the facility earlier this month. "Given the rapid daily increase in cross sanctions and logistical difficulties, Stellantis has suspended its manufacturing operations in Kaluga to ensure full compliance with all cross sanctions and to protect its employees," Stellantis said in a statement. The plant employs 2,700 people. The company will continue to pay salaries through a local downtime scheme and by using anticipated vacation periods, Stellantis told Reuters. It said it did not know how long the stoppage would last, adding that its priority was its staff and the return of peace. Stellantis had already suspended all exports and imports of vehicles with Russia, following Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, moving production to western Europe. It had also said it was freezing plans for more investments in the country. Van production in Kaluga had remained just for the local market. Scores of foreign companies have announced temporary shutdowns of stores and factories in Russia or said they were leaving the country for good since Russia began what it calls "a special military operation" in Ukraine on Feb. 24. Stellantis Chief Executive Carlos Tavares in late March said the group would have to close the Kaluga plant shortly as it was running out of parts. Separately on Tuesday, General Motors Co said it was extending its suspension of business in Russia due to the conflict and international sanctions. The U.S. automaker, which initially suspended imports into Russia and commercial activity on Feb. 28, said it was laying off most of its 66 employees and providing them with separation packages. GM does not have plants in Russia and only sold about 3,000 vehicles annually there prior to the suspension. (Additional reporting by Ben Klayman in Washington; Editing by Mark Potter and Mark Porter) Government/Legal Plants/Manufacturing Fiat Jeep Citroen Opel Peugeot
In Michigan, car hackers could face life imprisonment
Fri, Apr 29 2016Car hackers may not want to mess with vehicles in and around the Motor City. A pair of Michigan lawmakers introduced legislation Thursday that would punish anyone who infiltrates a vehicle's electronic systems with penalties as harsh as life imprisonment. Senate bill 927 says that "a person shall not intentionally access or cause access to be made to an electronic system of a motor vehicle to willfully destroy, damage, impair, alter or gain unauthorized control of the motor vehicle." Offenders will be deemed guilty of a felony, and may be imprisoned for any number of years up to life in prison. The proposed legislation is one of the first attempts nationally to address the consequences for car hacking, which has become a top concern throughout the auto industry. Critics have accused executives of being slow to respond to the threats, which were first known as long as six years ago but gained attention last July when a pair of researchers remotely controlled a Jeep Cherokee. In January, the industry established an Information Sharing and Analysis Center to collectively evaluate security measures and counter breaches. But the Michigan bill isn't noteworthy only because of the life penalty prescribed; it's noteworthy for what's missing in its details. Language in the bill doesn't delineate between independent cyber-security researchers and criminals who intend to inflict harm or havoc. Under its provisions, it's possible Charlie Miller, pictured below, and Chris Valasek, the researchers who demonstrated last summer that the Cherokee could be remotely commandeered and controlled, could face life behind bars. Provisions of the legislation that prevent a person from "altering" the motor vehicle could ensnare car enthusiasts or gearheads who tinker with electronic systems to boost performance, increase fuel efficiency or add aftermarket features. In that context, Senate Bill 927 seems like the latest measure in a running feud between independent researchers, gearheads and big automakers. Car companies don't like third parties poking around their electronic systems and would prefer the researchers not reveal security weaknesses. Researchers, on the other hand, say many carmakers are either slow to fix or unwilling to repair security holes unless they're able to publish their findings.