2014 Hyundai Sonata Gls on 2040-cars
649 Dunn Rd, Hazelwood, Missouri, United States
Engine:2.4L I4 16V GDI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5NPEB4AC3EH934860
Stock Num: 7326
Make: Hyundai
Model: Sonata GLS
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Venetian Red Metallic
Interior Color: Gray
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 15
Gry Premium Cloth. Suitable switchgear. Fun to drive. If you want an amazing deal on an amazing car that will keep you smiling all day, then take a look at this fun 2014 Hyundai Sonata. Rack up savings on this priced-to-move Sonata. So clean, it looks like it just rolled off the showroom floor. Experience the Mungenast Difference! Visit us at mungenasthyundai.com. Mungenast Hyundai in Hazelwood just off of North Lindbergh and I-270 at 649 Dunn Rd, Hazelwood, MO 63042 888-212-1161 St Louis's Low-Priced Volume Hyundai Dealer! Remember, Hyundai makes the car, Mungenast makes the difference!Prices do not include additional fees and costs of closing, including government fees and taxes, any finance charges, any dealer fees, any emissions testing fees or other fees. All prices, specifications and availability subject to change without notice. Contact dealer for most current information. Advertised price includes all available factory and dealership rebates and discounts. See Mungenast Hyundai for complete details. This offer includes all rebates and dealer cash back to the dealer. Includes the $2000 HMF Bonus cash so this offer in not available with 0% financing. Includes Valued Owner Rebate of $500 and Military Rebate of $500. See a Mungenast Sales Associate for complete details and requirements for rebates. All Dealer Installed Accessories are extra. Come Experience the Mungenast Difference at Mungenast Hyundai. St Louis' Low Price Volume Hyundai Dealership. View the new prices at MungenastHyundai.com At 270 and N. Lindberg on Dunn Rd in Hazelwood, MO. Remember Hyundai Makes the Car, Mungenast Makes the Difference! 888-212-1161
Hyundai Sonata for Sale
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,016.00)
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,016.00)
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,016.00)
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,016.00)
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,016.00)
2014 hyundai sonata gls(US $19,157.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
Xpert Auto Service ★★★★★
Wrench Teach GV ★★★★★
Twin City Toyota ★★★★★
Trux Unlimited Inc ★★★★★
The Tint Shop ★★★★★
The Automotive Shop of Melbourne ★★★★★
Auto blog
Hyundai developing safety system calibrated for 'secondary impacts'
Thu, Jan 24 2019There is an inherent flaw with how traditional airbags are used and deployed: They can only reply to one impact. The Hyundai Motor Group wants to address this with a new "multi-collision airbag system" that focuses on impacts that occur after the first point of contact. Hyundai defines multi-collision accidents as "those in which the primary impact is followed by collisions with secondary objects, such as trees, electrical posts or other vehicles." In a press release, Hyundai noted that about 30 percent of roughly 56,000 accidents between 2000 and 2012 in North America involved these types of multi-collisions, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)'s National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System division. The airbag systems in today's cars don't always go off when the first accident occurs, and when a car goes through a secondary impact, the airbags may no longer provide the best safety. Hyundai's new system can read the positions of the car's occupants and react in a more beneficial way. It can quickly recalibrate after the first impact based on readings from the vehicle and the people inside, which allows the second part of the crash to trigger the airbags. As of now the system is still in development, but Hyundai Motor Group is planning to use it in both Kia and Hyundai vehicles in the future. Which models and which markets it will apply to first are yet to be determined. Related Video:
EPA says it will more closely monitor fuel economy claims from automakers
Fri, 15 Feb 2013The unintended acceleration brouhaha at Toyota led to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration tightening the vise on recall procedures. Likewise, the fuel economy kerfuffle that blew up with Hyundai and Kia's admission of overstated fuel mileage claims could lead to the Environmental Protection Agency policing automaker assertions by performing more audits.
At least, that's what a senior engineer with the government agency said while in Michigan giving a talk, according to a report in Automotive News. What that actually means, however, is still in question. Just ten to 15 percent of new vehicles - something like 150 to 200 cars per year - are rested by the EPA to verify automaker numbers. The EPA's own tests include a "fudge factor" to adjust lab mileage for real-world mileage, and the agency still relies on automakers to submit data for tests that it doesn't have the facilities to perform. How much more auditing can the EPA really expect to do, or perhaps a more relevant question would be how much more accurate could the EPA's audits become?
The price of gasoline, the psychological importance of 40 miles per gallon to a frugal car buyer, an automaker wanting to further justify the price premium of a hybrid, all of these things contribute to fuel economy numbers that insist on creeping upward. Perhaps the senior engineer encapsulated the whole situation best when he said, "Everybody wants a label that tells you exactly what you're going to get, but obviously that's not possible. A good general rule of thumb is that real-world fuel economy is about 20 percent lower than the lab numbers." If the lesson isn't exactly 'buyer beware,' it's at least 'buyer be wary.'
2020 Toyota Highlander vs other 3-row crossovers: There can only be one!
Fri, Dec 20 2019We've done quite a few spec comparison posts involving three-row family crossovers, and when included, the Toyota Highlander has always been the runt of the group. While the rest increasingly seemed to be benchmarking each other toward greater girth, the Highlander was the outlier. That changes a bit for the 2020 Toyota Highlander, but only a bit. It's now larger and more competitive, specifically in regards to the amount of cargo space aft of the third-row seat. As you can see below, this aligns the Highlander most closely to its long-time competitor the 2020 Honda Pilot. However, let's see how it stacks up to others in the segment, which is heavily populated now, so for the sake of space, we've selected the newest entries: Kia Telluride, Hyundai Palisade, Subaru Ascent and Ford Explorer. The order in which they are presented is random. Performance and fuel economy The 2020 Highlander is more than 200 pounds lighter than its predecessor, but has the same 295-horsepower V6 engine that was already one of the strongest in the segment. We'd say that would give it a leg up, but the Pilot and Explorer have proven to be sprinters, delivering 0-60 times in the low-6 range by some publications' stopwatches (or VBoxes, whatever). We don't expect the Highlander to beat them, but it may dip into the 6's. The heavy, less-powerful Subaru Ascent is most likely to take up the rear. It's fuel economy of 23 mpg combined also matches the Highlander and Explorer for segment-best. Remember, however, that the Explorer's turbocharged inline-four engine is likely more susceptible to differences in driving style (read: a heavy foot). Of course, if you're really interested in fuel economy, the Highlander and Explorer are the only vehicles in the segment to offer hybrid versions. The Ford Explorer Hybrid puts a greater emphasis on performance, however, resulting in lower estimates of 25 mpg combined (AWD) and 28 mpg combined (FWD). By contrast, the new 2020 Toyota Highlander Hybrid is estimated to return 36 mpg combined. Passenger and cargo space According to Highlander chief engineer Yoshikazu Saeki, he had a choice of two directions with the new Highlander. He could have indeed made it bigger, matching these very competitors, especially in terms of third-row and cargo space. Or, he could have maintained a smaller-than-average size. He obviously chose the latter. First, it was the size customers had come to expect. Would they be put off by something bigger?






























