Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2005 Hyundai Santa Fe on 2040-cars

Year:2005 Mileage:153265 Color: silver
Location:

Aberdeen, Maryland, United States

Aberdeen, Maryland, United States
Advertising:

Auto Services in Maryland

Vision Autographics ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 2595 Hanco Center Dr, Marbury
Phone: (703) 590-8525

Virginia Tire & Auto of Cascades ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 46655 Algonkian Parkway, Potomac
Phone: (703) 433-5062

The Mobile Mechanic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6515 Pebble Brooke Rd., Govans
Phone: (410) 358-5845

Standard Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 2020 Hollins Ferry Rd, Curtis-Bay
Phone: (443) 853-1735

Spiering`s Garage Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 13281 Greensboro Rd, Marydel
Phone: (410) 482-2238

Self Service Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 7721 Baltimore Annapolis Blvd, Harmans
Phone: (410) 787-9221

Auto blog

2017 Hyundai Elantra Awarded Top IIHS Safety Rating | Autoblog Minute

Sat, Jul 30 2016

In vehicle safety news, the Hyundai Elantra has snagged a Top Safety Pick+rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Hyundai Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video crash test autos

Hyundai And Kia Penalized $350 Million For Overstated MPG Claims

Tue, Nov 4 2014

Nearly two years after Hyundai and Kia announced they exaggerated fuel economy numbers for several of their most popular models, the two Korean automakers have paid a heavy penalty for the transgressions. The Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency announced a settlement Monday that will cost the two car companies approximately $350 million. The financial sum includes a $100 million fine, the largest ever levied under the Clean Air Act, and about $200 million in forfeited greenhouse-gas emissions credits. At a time when car buyers rank fuel economy as a top concern when they head to dealerships and the federal government has mandated increased efficiency, Attorney General Eric Holder said the settlement should serve as a warning to automakers not to fudge their numbers. "This will send a strong message that cheating is not profitable," he said. The settlement ends a federal lawsuit filed against the automakers in U.S. District Court, but it's important to note that it doesn't end a class-action lawsuit filed on behalf of consumers. A preliminary settlement in that case, based in Los Angeles, was approved last month, but final approval isn't expected until July 2015. Officials with the EPA said the $100 million figure roughly equals the economic benefits the two companies received from exaggerating the mileage claims on the window stickers of new cars. Fuel-efficient boasts helped Hyundai and Kia establish a strong foothold in the U.S. marketplace. Advertisements for the Hyundai Elantra stated the vehicle achieved 40 miles per gallon in highway driving, and helped the car win the prestigious North American Car Of The Year honors at the Detroit Auto Show for its 2012 model. In July 2011, the advocacy group Consumer Watchdog began receiving complaints from consumers that the Elantra and other Hyundai models fell short of their stated mileage claims in real-world driving. The group wrote to the EPA and Hyundai, asking both to investigate. Government officials said Kia had overstated the mileage on its popular Kia Soul crossover by 6 miles per gallon, and more than a dozen overall models were affected. On Monday, EPA administrator Gina McCarthy said the violations were "egregious." Based on the exaggerations, the EPA calculated that Hyundai and Kia had underreported the greenhouse gas emissions of their fleets by about 4.75 metric tons over the estimated lifetime of the vehicles. That figure aided in the $200 million credit forfeiture.

Renault, Nissan and Hyundai face shutdowns in India over workers' COVID fears

Tue, May 25 2021

CHENNAI, India — Automakers Renault, its alliance partner Nissan and Hyundai face temporary factory closures in India due to growing unrest among workers concerned about rising COVID-19 infections. Workers at Renault-Nissan's car plant in the southern state of Tamil Nadu will go on strike on Wednesday because their COVID-related safety demands have not been met, a union representing the workers told the company in a letter on Monday. Hyundai said it would suspend operations at its plant, also in Tamil Nadu, for five days starting Tuesday, after several workers staged a brief, sit-in protest on Monday amid rising cases in the state. "The management agreed to close the plant after workers expressed concerns over safety after two employees succumbed to COVID," E. Muthukumar, president of the Hyundai Motor India Employees Union, told Reuters. The unrest highlights the challenges companies face in India amid a huge wave of COVID-19 infections, an overwhelmed health system and a shortage of vaccines which is making employees more fearful. Tamil Nadu is one of the worst hit states with more than 30,000 cases a day last week. The state, an auto hub known as India's Detroit, has imposed a lockdown until May 31 but allowed some factories, including auto plants, to continue operating. The strike threat at the Renault-Nissan plant came ahead of a court hearing on Monday over allegations from workers that social distancing norms were being flouted and factory health policies did not sufficiently address the risk to lives. Renault-Nissan has said it is following COVID-19 safety protocols. At the hearing, a lawyer for the workers argued that while the company had reduced the number of shifts, production numbers had not been cut and the headcount remained the same leading to crowding on the factory floor. The company told the court it had reduced the workforce to around 5,000 from 8,000. It also said it had vaccinated employees over 45 and was willing to inoculate those under 45 if vaccines were made available. The two-judge bench presiding over the case said that while the health of workers is paramount, if industries go down there will be no place for them to work. They also said the company must not take advantage of the exemption granted by the state and should reduce production to meet only necessary export orders. "The production should have fallen ... You also have to assuage the feeling of the workers," said the court, which will next hear the case on May 31.