Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1999 Honda Accord Ex Sedan 4-door 2.3l on 2040-cars

US $2,000.00
Year:1999 Mileage:65316
Location:

Baldwin, New York, United States

Baldwin, New York, United States
Advertising:

This Honda Accord EX runs great but has its hiccups here or there. For a 14 year old car 65,000 miles is very low. This car was bought from a mechanic shop in Queens, NY. Had a few issues with overheating but that issue has been repaired. A new radiator was installed in Oct. 2013.I do regular oil changes and maintenance. Selling Price is at $2,000 because it is sort of a fixer-upper. But with the minor issues this price is a great deal. 

Auto Services in New York

Walton Service Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1634 State Route 54, Bluff-Point
Phone: (315) 536-6928

Vitali Auto Exchange ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 236 Main St, Owego
Phone: (607) 797-7900

Vision Hyundai of Canandaigua ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2440 Rochester Rd Rte 332, Bloomfield
Phone: (585) 394-3800

Tony B`s Tire & Automotive Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 684 Main St, Port-Crane
Phone: (607) 729-8670

Steve`s Complete Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 425 E John St, Wyandanch
Phone: (631) 669-2189

Steve`s Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6060 Route 353, Otto
Phone: (716) 938-9130

Auto blog

Honda accused of not reporting all airbag problems

Fri, 17 Oct 2014

The Takata airbag recall that has afflicted a number of automakers may have just taken a very bad turn for Honda, which has already recalled over one million vehicles. Clarence Ditlow and the Center for Auto Safety have accused the Japanese manufacturer of failing to report two "injury-and-death" incidents. To determine just what happened, the company has initiated a third-party audit.
According to Bloomberg, CAS claims Honda failed to report fatalities in 2009 and 2013, a point Honda doesn't seem to contest, indicating that it didn't report so-called "verbal claims."
"It is our understanding that some manufacturers choose to include these types of verbal claims, and that these constitute the majority of the injury-and-death claims that they report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration," the company told Bloomberg via email. "We believe this practice accounts for the vast majority of the difference between the total number of injury-and-death claims reported by Honda compared to certain other manufacturers."

Honda HR-V Prototype looks awfully familiar

Thu, 02 Oct 2014

Is there anything quite so exciting as seeing a brand-new vehicle for the very first time? Part of the allure of auto shows is the chance to see new ideas, just before they're fully baked and ready for public consumption. "Prototypes" you might say, of production models that are just around the corner. Or, in the case of the Honda HR-V, already down the block a ways.
Here in Paris, Honda has unveiled its HR-V Prototype, a nearly production-ready version of a "new SUV for Europe." Before we take umbrage with that SUV designation - as far as we can tell the Fit-based crossover isn't much of a mudder - we should address the fact that at this year's New York Auto Show in April, Honda handed over just a few images and specs of the actually production-read HR-V for the US. Presumably this is a "prototype" for Europe, where the NYC car is US-specific, but we're still scratching our heads a bit.
No matter! Here in France, Honda tells us that the utile little hatch will be available powered by both a 1.5-liter gasoline engine (the one American customers will see), and a 1.6-liter diesel unit, both wearing the company's Earth Dreams Technology label and presumably running cleaner and more frugally than ever. In Europe, a standard six-speed manual will come with both mills, while the 1.5-liter will offer the option of a continuously variable transmission.

It turns out Takata isn't willing to expand airbag recall nationally after all

Wed, Dec 3 2014

There have been "approximately 0.000006 failures per air bag deployment, which is far below the failure rate" of most recalls, Takata claims. Takata has seemingly made an about face following reports that it would expand its regional airbag recall into a nationwide repair effort, issuing a scathing, four-page letter rebutting allegations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and its Office of Defects while simultaneously attacking the government's handling of the situation. The Japanese supplier claims in its letter that the "currently available, reliable information does not support a nationwide determination of a safety defect," arguing that there were "approximately 0.000006 failures per air bag deployment, which is far below the failure rate in the vast majority of the thousands of recalls," The Detroit News reports. Takata then breaks down the two specific incidents mentioned in NHTSA's original recall request letter, a 2005 Honda Accord and 2007 Ford Mustang. Referencing the two crashes, NHTSA Administrator David Friedman said last month "one incident is an anomaly, but two are a trend." The supplier, though, argues the Honda issue is already being covered by that company's soon-to-be-national recall (more on that in a moment). The company then goes on to point out that neither Takata nor NHTSA has been able to analyze the Mustang's airbag inflator, saying that such a lack of examination meant there was "no way to ascertain what actually occurred during the incident, whether any inflator ruptured, and whether any inflator rupture that may have occurred was related to the incidents that led to the current regional campaigns." Takata alleges that NHTSA has disobeyed its own statutes. Takata also took the opportunity to take a few swipes at NHTSA's behavior during the airbag scandal, saying it was "very surprised to receive" a recall request letter because the ODI had yet to even receive the company's responses to a pair of special orders. It also alleged that NHTSA was disobeying its own statute, which says only manufacturers of vehicles and replacement equipment can "decide in good faith whether their products contain a safety related defect," and that the government can only "issue an initial decision that a safety-related defect exists" to those same entities.