Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Used Gmc Acadia Slt Black Interior Leather Sunroof Remote Start on 2040-cars

Year:2012 Mileage:48523 Color: Gray
Location:

North Olmsted, Ohio, United States

North Olmsted, Ohio, United States
Advertising:
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:6
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gas
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1GKKVRED9CJ418585
Year: 2012
Make: GMC
Disability Equipped: No
Model: Acadia
Doors: 4
Drivetrain: All Wheel Drive
Mileage: 48,523
Trim: SLT Sport Utility 4-Door
Sub Model: SLT1
Drive Type: AWD
Exterior Color: Gray
Number of Cylinders: 6

GMC Acadia for Sale

Auto Services in Ohio

West Chester Autobody Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 9366 Cincinnati Columbus Rd, Trenton
Phone: (513) 777-3857

West Chester Autobody ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 9366 Cincinnati Columbus Rd, Goshen
Phone: (513) 268-0219

USA Tire & Auto Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 1501 E Dorothy Ln, Springboro
Phone: (937) 310-5354

Trans-Master Transmissions ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 725 N Main St, Dayton
Phone: (937) 746-5620

Tom & Jerry Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1701 Kenny Rd, Amlin
Phone: (614) 488-8507

Tint Works, LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Customizing, Automobile Detailing
Address: 189 W Olentangy St Suite C, Richwood
Phone: (614) 649-5878

Auto blog

2015 Chevy Colorado to start at $20,100*, GMC Canyon at $20,995**

Tue, 05 Aug 2014

General Motors has just announced pricing for its new midsize pickup trucks, the 2015 Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon. Chevy's truck starts at $20,100, *not including $895 for destination, and the GMC starts at $20,995, **not including $925 for destination. These prices are for the base, extended cab models with the 200-horsepower, 2.5-liter inline four-cylinder engine.
Comparatively, these prices fit nicely with the $18,125 starting MSRP of the Toyota Tacoma and the $21,510 of the Nissan Frontier. Compared to the Colorado, the Canyon's extra $895 gets you niceties like LED running lamps, 16-inch alloy wheels, and a four-way power driver's seat.
Both trucks come standard with the 2.5-liter engine, and a more powerful, 305-hp 3.6-liter V6 will also be available. Pricing has not been announced for the upcoming diesel model, which is expected to launch for the 2016 model year.

2020 GMC Sierra HD caught in double-cab, low-trim gas-engine guise

Mon, Feb 4 2019

Naturally when the 2020 GMC Sierra HD was revealed, GMC picked the flashiest, most-impressive Denali model with the big crew cab configuration and diesel engine. But obviously not all will be equipped that way, so it's exciting to see a lower trim model like the truck above. This 2020 GMC Sierra HD is a more modest SLT trim model equipped with the gas V8 and lacking the MultiPro tailgate. Styling doesn't take a hit with the shorter shape, and arguably, it looks more athletic without so much metal between the wheels. The length is the only real difference, with the rest of the sheetmetal just as chisled on the bigger version. Interestingly, this gas-powered Sierra HD still has a big hood scoop from its diesel sibling. On the current GM heavy duty trucks, only the diesel models get a scoop, and it's specifically for getting more cool air to the intake. The Silverado HD may continue this differentiation, but GMC is clearly keeping it for all models. When the Sierra HD goes on sale this summer, it will be available with either a 6.2-liter gasoline V8 like in this truck, or a 6.6-liter turbodiesel V8 making 445 horsepower and 910 pound-feet of torque, the same as the current model. All models get bedside steps, and the MultiPro tailgate is available either as standard or an option with all trims. Related Video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.