1962 Ford Thunderbird, 2 Dr. Hrd Top on 2040-cars
Lancaster, California, United States
Body Type:Coupe
Engine:390 cubic inch
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Thunderbird
Trim: 2 door hard top
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 67,780
Exterior Color: White
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Red
1962 Ford Thunderbird
Every major mechanical item in this car has been rebuilt or replaced. The original 390 cubic inch engine
and transmission have approx. 2,500 miles since total rebuild. The brake system, upholstery, dash pad,
and all new weather stripping. The interior gauges and chrome are as new. The radio is a replica
T-Bird AM-FM with new speaker. Original radio is included. The car was originally equipped with
A/C, power windows, power seat, swing away wheel, and tinted windows. Fully detailed engine and
engine compartment. Has the original fender skirts. Car was re-painted in the original color of
Corinthian White. This car was purchased new in the high desert area of Lancaster, CA and has
remained in the desert since new. Have all receipts. Current mileage if 67,780. $15,000
Ford Thunderbird for Sale
1960 ford thunderbird factory sunroof, 430, a/c rare, rare, rare!!(US $26,000.00)
1955 ford thunderbird replica- soft top- authentic to original- lo reserve
4 limited edition ford thunderbird cars 2002 - 2005 soft hard top convertibles
1979 ford thunderbird base hardtop 2-door 5.8l(US $3,500.00)
(C $16,000.00)
1961 thunderbird tbird convertible indianapolis 500 pace car clone project
Auto Services in California
Zoe Design Inc ★★★★★
Zee`s Smog Test Only Station ★★★★★
World Class Collision Ctr ★★★★★
WOOPY`S Auto Parts ★★★★★
William Michael Automotive ★★★★★
Will Tiesiera Ford Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM details CEO Mary Barra's pay, contacts with investor David Einhorn
Wed, Apr 5 2017Earnings/Financials Chrysler Ford GM Sergio Marchionne Mary Barra Mark Fields david einhorn greenlight capital
TRANSLOGIC 147: CES 2014 Autonomous Vehicles
Wed, Jan 15 2014We head back to CES in Las Vegas to check on the progress of autonomous vehicles in 2014. We go hands-free on the highway with Audi, narrowly avoid a collision with Ford and hear all about BMW's drifting driverless car. But first we take a ride on Induct's self-driving Navia shuttle.
Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota
Wed, Feb 25 2015It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study




















