2004 Ford Taurus Se - 3.0l V6 - 196170 on 2040-cars
Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.0L V6
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Model: Taurus
Trim: LX Sedan 4-Door
Options: Cassette Player
Drive Type: FWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 62,889
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Green
Interior Color: Tan
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Ford Taurus for Sale
2010 taurus sho (certified)(US $28,980.00)
2002 ford taurus se wagon runs great low miles ex. clean(US $4,900.00)
2008 ford taurus sel sedan 4-door 3.5l-39,210 garage kept miles!!
2003 ford taurus ses loaded clean family sedan - runs / looks great! 1-owner tx(US $3,850.00)
2000 ford taurus 4 parts any & all trans, rebuilt heads and gaskets, 2 new tires(US $1,400.00)
2001 ford taurus, no reserve
Auto Services in Georgia
Woodstock Quality Paint and Body ★★★★★
Volvo-Vol-Repairs ★★★★★
Village Garage And Custom ★★★★★
Tim`s Auto Upholstery ★★★★★
Tilden Car Care Abs ★★★★★
TDS Auto Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford demonstrates Mustang's new Line Lock burnout feature
Tue, 22 Apr 2014Been saving your pennies for a 2015 Ford Mustang? Put in a few extra shifts or some overtime? Got a great down payment ready? Well, however much you saved for your new pony car, start saving more - you'll need the extra money to spend on tires.
That's because the Mustang will come with a system called Line Lock, which can lock the front brakes electronically, allowing drivers to perform big, dumb, smoky burnouts without moving so much as an inch. It's sort of like launch control, only the average driver might actually use it.
Now, line locks aren't uncommon, particularly in drag racing. Usually, a flip of the switch locks the front brakes. The Mustang, besides offering the system from the factory which is unique in and of itself, looks a bit more involved.
2015 Ford Focus
Tue, 14 Oct 2014Sitting down at the pre-drive briefing with Ford engineers ahead of sampling the refreshed 2015 Focus, water bottles clinked as we wet our whistles before Q&A. While pouring a glass, we noticed something stamped on the bottle label: "1L." One liter. We were palming the exact displacement of the EcoBoost engine our group was about to drive. This was undoubtedly coincidence (such bottles litter every conference and dinner table in Europe) but it served to drive home just how small the total swept volume of Ford's wunderkind powerplant really is. It's tiny.
Of course, this isn't our first run-in with the little triple - we've sampled its turbocharged charms before in Ford's smaller Fiesta. At that time, we found it had plenty of poke for the subcompact, but the larger C-segment Focus carries around another 450 pounds or so and pushes a wider profile through the air. Would the three-cylinder have the stuffing to make the most of the Focus' athletic chassis, or would it be a letdown? Would it be the same as it was when we tested it in a Euro-spec Focus a couple of years ago? There was nothing left for it but to head out on the bucolic roads surrounding Versailles the day after the Paris Motor Show and find out for ourselves.
Malcolm Gladwell reflects on engineering, recalls, and compromise
Thu, Apr 30 2015Journalist Malcolm Gladwell has made a career taking on big, complicated topics and humanizing them to make the unwieldy understandable. He has already done this in bestsellers like The Tipping Point and Outliers, and now he has brought the same approach to automotive recalls in a long piece for The New Yorker. The article titled The Engineer's Lament is framed around an interview with the former head of Ford's recall office about the famous Ford Pinto campaign where the position of the compact's fuel tank could cause it to explode in rear-end collisions. Plus, there are detours into Toyota's unintended acceleration cases and the General Motors ignition switch problem. While all the history is illuminating, the heart of the story comes from an examination at the thought process of engineers, and how their thinking differs from other professions. Gladwell comes off as sympathetic to auto engineers in this piece. While he admits that they often approach problems in a sterile way, the writer doesn't try point that out as a failing. It's merely a fact to be understood. The story itself is quite lengthy, but well worth a read if you have the time for an insiders view into how these recalls are assessed on the inside.




















