2006 Ford Ranger Xl Standard Cab Pickup 2-door 2.3l, Nice Working Pick Up 91k on 2040-cars
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:4 cyl, 2.3L
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Number of Cylinders: 4
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Trim: XL
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 91,450
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Sub Model: XL 2 door
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
2006 FORD RANGER REGULAR CAB TRUCK
Payments:
A deposit of $500 must be paid within 24 Hours after the Auction is closed. When the deposit has been submitted, the remaining balance must be paid within 7 Days. If payment is made by cashiers or any other loan checks, we will hold the titles for 7 days or until funds have cleared. Vehicle must be inspected before the final bid and paid within 7 days, if the car is not paid in full after 7 days deposit not refundable, SO Please COLLECT your funds before biding on it!
Car is available for inspection by request, for appointment please calls at (267)312-1616.
All taxes and fees associated with registering and transportation of the vehicle are the responsibility of the buyer. We may assist with registration in PA at your request, a $95 documentation fee and out of state temporary tag $ 40(if needed) would be added to final price.
OR Visit us at Autotrackline.com
WE ACCEPT: VISA/MasterCard/Discover/American Express/Diners Club (3%extra charge)
This vehicle is for sale locally and I reserve the right to cancel all bids and end the auction early if the vehicle no longer be available for sale. Please keep in mind that no used vehicle is perfect; expect some normal cosmetic and mechanical wear. Mileage may be slightly different from original at listing one.
Ford Ranger for Sale
2001 ford ranger xlt extended cab pickup 4-door 4.0l
2010 ford ranger super cab sport florida truck low miles perfect!(US $22,400.00)
2006 ranger sport! supercharged!!!! no reserve auction!
2003 ford ranger xlt "edge" stepside.
Clean, xlt, 84,000 mile/motor, new tires(US $3,995.00)
2000 ford ranger xlt standard cab pickup 2-door 2.5l
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Valley Tire Co Inc ★★★★★
Trinity Automotive ★★★★★
Total Lube Center Plus ★★★★★
Tim Howard Auto Repair ★★★★★
Terry`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Spina & Adams Collision Svc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Toyota fears supplier pressure in Australia with GM pull out
Wed, 11 Dec 2013With Ford and General Motors both announcing an end to production in Australia, the country's auto industry is in a bad way. With the exit of two big players, there's increased concern that a third Australian manufacturer, Toyota, will be forced out, as well.
"We are saddened to learn of GM Holden's decision. This will place unprecedented pressure on the local supplier network and our ability to build cars in Australia," Toyota Australia said in a statement. The GM closure of Holden production will be the direct end to 2,900 jobs, but will also force a dramatic reduction in the size of the country's supplier network, as there will simply be fewer cars to build.
In the same statement, Toyota Australia said it would work with suppliers and local government to figure out whether continuing production Down Under was even feasible. According to Automotive News, a representative for the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union told reporters it was "highly likely" that Toyota would also close up shop within the next few years.
Ford profiles surprisingly affluent Focus ST buyers
Fri, 08 Nov 2013It comes as no surprise when Ford says that 32-percent of Focus ST buyers are under 35, but we weren't expecting this: the average annual salary of Focus ST buyers is $127,000. Twenty-two percent of non-ST Focus buyers are under 35, while their average annual salary is $67,000.
We like the Focus ST because it has 252 horsepower, is genuinely fun to drive and offers great value for performance-minded car enthusiasts; facts that are not lost on customers, it seems. Ford says that the Focus ST has the highest percentage of conquest sales for a non-hybrid model it sells, and that the top-four trade-ins are from Honda, Chevrolet, Mazda and Toyota. Demand for the hot Focus is strongest in Los Angeles, Detroit, Houston and Orlando.
"[The Focus ST is] having this kind of halo effect for other vehicles we'd hoped for when we invested in the ST brand," says John Felice, vice president of US marketing, sales and service, because it's helping to boost sales of other Ford vehicles.
Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid
Tue, Jun 17 2014It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.