1964 Ford Ranchero Pickup. V8 Auto. Ready To Be Enjoyed! on 2040-cars
Ambrose, North Dakota, United States
Engine:8-Cylinder
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Make: Ford
BodyStyle: Classic Car - Custom Car
Model: Ranchero
FuelType: Gasoline
Mileage: 50,400
Trim: deluxe packagew
Sub Model: Pickup
Drive Type: 2 wheel
Exterior Color: Burgundy
Number of Cylinders: 8
Interior Color: Grey/Red
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
RANCHERO IS IN NEAR SHOW CAR CONDITION 260 MOTOR HAS BEEN REPLACED WITH 289 AND HAS APPROX 5000 MILES ON OVERHAUL, CAR HAS BEAUTIFUL METALLIC PAINT JOB, CRAGER RIMS, AIR SHOCKS, DUAL EXHAUSTS CAR HAS LOTS OF SQUAAKUM POWER
Ford Ranchero for Sale
1970 ranchero with a 429(US $5,200.00)
1961 ford falcon ranchero 6 cyl. daily driver runs great gas saver(US $8,000.00)
1974 ford ranchero 500 standard cab pickup 2-door 5.8l
1963 ford ranchero pickup utility truck vintage '63 excellent! drives great 63
1978 ford ranchero gt(US $13,000.00)
1966 ford ranchero base 4.7l 289 no reserve price
Auto Services in North Dakota
Steve`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Steele-Dawson Towing ★★★★★
Steele Auto Body & Lube Center ★★★★★
Vern`s Auto Sales ★★★★
Tim`s Automotive ★★★★
Moorhead Auto Center ★★★★
Auto blog
Ford Fiesta 1.0L EcoBoost sales robust in early going
Tue, 13 May 2014Okay, okay, okay, so I was just a smidge wrong. Those that read my review of the Ford Fiesta with the new 1.0-liter, EcoBoost engine will know that while I really enjoyed the torquey little three-cylinder, I was concerned that Ford's decision to force 1.0-liter owners into a manual transmission, steel wheels and one trim level might hurt sales of the new engine. I was also concerned that the promised 45-mile-per-gallon highway rating wouldn't be enough to tempt buyers into trying an engine that's so far outside of what the general public is use to. My concerns, though, seem to have been for naught.
While not doing a booming business on the triple-equipped Fiesta, Ford is seeing a take rate of four to eight percent per month in the engine's first few months on sale. Now, four to eight percent might not sound like a lot - if, like last year, the Fiesta sells around 71,000 units, there'd be barely 5,600 1.0-liter models on the road. It is also small potatoes relative to the take rate on EcoBoost-equipped vehicles across the Ford range, which US sales analyst Erich Merkle estimates to be roughly 35 to 40 percent of retail sales. Still, according to The Detroit News, the 1.0-liter is getting adopted at roughly the same rate as the sparkling Fiesta ST, which should be a solid indication of just how well this little engine is doing.
The 1.0-liter's success "really speaks volumes, not just to what we're doing with the Fiesta, but with EcoBoost in general," Merkle told Autoblog.
New Chevy ad suggests truck war is alive and well | Autoblog Minute
Sat, Jun 11 2016Senior Editor Greg Migliore discusses Range Rover spy shots, Faraday Future's new executive hire, and the Chevy-Ford truck war. Ferrari Ford SUV Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video transportation faraday future marco mattiacci
2018 Ford F-150 Powerstroke vs. 2018 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel: comparing the specs
Mon, Jan 8 2018Now that Ford has finally released specifications for its diesel Ford F-150, we can finally see how it stacks up against its sole competition, the Ram 1500 EcoDiesel. Naturally, since we haven't driven the new diesel F-150, we can't tell you which is better on the road, but there are interesting things we can glean from the numbers. Compare these and other potential new vehicle purchases using our tool. For one thing, the two trucks are extremely similar from a powertrain perspective. Both trucks use a turbocharged 3.0-liter V6 diesel, with the Ford using a 10-speed automatic, and the Ram using an 8-speed automatic. The Powerstroke engine is built in the U.K. but specifically tuned by Ford for American pickup truck duty. It is also is related to the diesel V6 used by Jaguar and Land Rover. The Ram 1500's engine is made by VM Motori. Only 10 horsepower and 20 pound-feet of torque separate the two, with the Ford getting the slight advantage. The Ford also produces its horsepower and torque slightly sooner than the Ram. Peak power in the Ford comes at 3,250 rpm compared to 3,600 rpm in the Ram, and peak torque arrives at 1,750 rpm in the Ford, and 2,000 rpm in the Ram. View 9 Photos More significant differences become apparent in the payload and towing area, both of which put the Ford at an advantage. The F-150 Powerstroke can carry 2,020 pounds of cargo, or tow 11,400 pounds. The Ram EcoDiesel, depending on configuration, can carry 1,100 to 1,600 pounds of cargo, and tow between 7,560 and 9,210 pounds. Fuel economy might go to the Ford if it hits the company's target of 30 mpg highway. That would beat the Ram's 27 mpg highway. We don't know what Ford's target city mpg is, but the Ram manages 20 in town with two-wheel drive. Four-wheel drive drops the city rating to 19 mpg. View 6 Photos The biggest decider between the trucks might be cost. Ford is only offering its diesel engine on higher end trims, which means that the cheapest diesel F-150 starts at $46,315. That's for a two-wheel drive Lariat extended cab with a 6.5-foot bed. Ram on the other hand, offers the diesel in everything from its ultra-bare-bones Tradesman pickup, allowing for a base price of just $28,585, up to the fancy Laramie Longhorn and Limited trims. Ram's diesel is also available with all cab variants, while Ford's is only offered in extended- and double-cab body styles.