Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1988 Ford Mustang Gt Convertible 8k Miles V-8 5.0l Clean Auto Check on 2040-cars

Year:1988 Mileage:8711 Color: Red /
 Red
Location:

Girardville, Pennsylvania, United States

Girardville, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:5 Speed Stick
Body Type:Convertible
Engine:5.0
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Condition:
Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1FABP45E9JF261468
Year: 1988
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang
Trim: GT
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 5 Speed Manual
Options: Convertible
Mileage: 8,711
Sub Model: 2dr GT Convertible
Exterior Color: Red
Vehicle Inspection: Inspected (include details in your description)
Interior Color: Red

OFFERED FOR YOUR BIDDING CONSIDERATION IS A PRISTINE 1988 FORD MUSTANG GT 5.0

5-SPEED CONVERTIBLE.

THIS IS A RUST FREE, NON SMOKER, GARAGE KEPT CAR, DRIVEN ONLY 8,711 MILES!

ALL ORIGINAL, NO PAINTWORK, NO SURPRISES, CLEAN TITLE, CLEAN AUTO CHECK VEHICLE!

PLEASE LOOK CLOSELY AT PHOTOS TO ASSESS CONDITION FOR YOURSELF, THESE PHOTOS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES, THIS CAR IS "STILL IN THE WRAPPER"!!!


 I INVITE YOU TO CONTACT ME WITH ANY QUESTIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING.

 

 

PAYMENT: 

 NO INTERNATIONAL BIDDING PLEASE. I ACCEPT ONLY A $500.00 PAYPAL DEPOSIT, AND THAT DEPOSIT IS APPRECIATED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF AUCTION ENDING.  IF FULL PAYMENT IS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF AUCTION ENDING, AN UNPAID ITEM CASE WILL BE OPENED AND VEHICLE WILL BE RE LISTED IF PAYMENT IS NOT RECEIVED.

SHIPPING: 

THE BUYER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SHIPPING COSTS, HOWEVER, THIS VEHICLE MAY BE PICKED-UP AT THE DEALERSHIP OR YOU MAY CALL TO ARRANGE SHIPPING, AFTER VERIFIED PAYMENT.  

 I STRIVE FOR 100% POSITIVE FEEDBACK AND YOUR SATISFACTION IS MY NUMBER ONE PRIORITY.  IF YOU’RE UNHAPPY WITH ANY PART OF YOUR SHOPPING EXPERIENCE WITH ME, PLEASE LET ME KNOW BEFORE LEAVING NEGATIVE FEEDBACK SO I CAN DO MY BEST TO FIX IT!

HAPPY BIDDING!

 

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Valley Tire Co Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 15 McKean Ave, Brier-Hill
Phone: (724) 489-4483

Trinity Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Inspection Service
Address: 444 Lehigh Street, Trexlertown
Phone: (610) 432-2034

Total Lube Center Plus ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Motorcycles & Motor Scooters-Repairing & Service
Address: 118 Walnut Bottom Rd, Camp-Hill
Phone: (717) 301-4828

Tim Howard Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 12TH Street And Pennsylvania Ave, Clinton
Phone: (304) 797-0171

Terry`s Auto Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 6314 State Route 30, Hunker
Phone: (724) 523-6553

Spina & Adams Collision Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1161 Egypt Rd, Gulph-Mills
Phone: (610) 666-7979

Auto blog

Ford Police Interceptors win acceleration war against Dodge, Chevy

Thu, 17 Oct 2013

Just last month, Ford announced its first-ever non-pursuit-rated version of the Police Interceptor sedan for agencies looking to maximize fuel economy, but that doesn't mean that Ford is giving up on chasing down the bad guys. While the Dodge Charger can lay claim to the fastest lap time at the Grattan Raceway test facility held by the Michigan State Police, the results are now in for the Police Vehicle Evaluation acceleration tests. And Ford's Police Interceptor duo (sedan and utility) came out on top.
In the acceleration tests, Ford says that the Taurus-based PI Sedan with the newly available 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 was the quickest among prospective police cars in both 0-60 and 0-100 mile per hour times. The sedan posted a 0-60 time of 5.66 seconds with all-wheel drive and 5.71 seconds with front-wheel drive, besting V8-powered competitors like the Chevy Caprice and Dodge Charger by more than 0.3 seconds. These rivals close the gap on the AWD sedan in the 0-100 test with the Ford taking 13.5 seconds compared to the Chevy's time of 14.35 and the Dodge's time of 14.7.
As for utility vehicles, the Explorer-based PI Utility, which accounts for 60 percent of Ford's police vehicle sales, essentially went head-to-head with the V8-powered Chevy Tahoe with similar results. Equipped with the new EcoBoost engine option, this big SUV hit 60 mph in just 6.28 seconds and 100 mph in 15.51 seconds compared to times of 8.22 seconds and 21.95 seconds, respectively, for the Tahoe. Other important tests in the PVE include braking and top speed, but while no automakers have stepped up to boast about their numbers in either of these categories, Ford's images show that the V8 Caprice had the highest top speed of the cars at 155 mph while the Tahoe's 139-mph speed made it the fastest utility vehicle.

Chrysler called out over lackluster Ram Runner by racer who helped develop it

Fri, 11 Apr 2014

Fans of off-roading and desert blasting might recall that Chrysler offers an aftermarket conversion that can turn a Ram 1500 into a road-legal desert racer, called the Ram Runner. The kit, sold through Mopar, includes some significant suspension upgrades, body tweaks and a brawnier cat-back exhaust for the truck's 5.7-liter V8.
Considering all of this, comparisons with the almighty Ford F-150 SVT Raptor are common. Among the off-road community, that makes these two a sort of Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang for people that prefer driving on dirt. In the Race-Dezert forum, the discussion as to which truck was better was proceeding as normal - Ram fans said their piece and Ford fans said theirs. Then, a man named Kent Kroeker offered up his two cents.
See, Kroeker is a Baja racer, and the man that helped develop the Ram Runner. Despite his association with the truck, though, he had some less than kind words for Chrysler and the Ram Runner.

2016: The year of the autonomous-car promise

Mon, Jan 2 2017

About half of the news we covered this year related in some way to The Great Autonomous Future, or at least it seemed that way. If you listen to automakers, by 2020 everyone will be driving (riding?) around in self-driving cars. But what will they look like, how will we make the transition from driven to driverless, and how will laws and infrastructure adapt? We got very few answers to those questions, and instead were handed big promises, vague timelines, and a dose of misdirection by automakers. There has been a lot of talk, but we still don't know that much about these proposed vehicles, which are at least three years off. That's half a development cycle in this industry. We generally only start to get an idea of what a company will build about two years before it goes on sale. So instead of concrete information about autonomous cars, 2016 has brought us a lot of promises, many in the form of concept cars. They have popped up from just about every automaker accompanied by the CEO's pledge to deliver a Level 4 autonomous, all-electric model (usually a crossover) in a few years. It's very easy to say that a static design study sitting on a stage will be able to drive itself while projecting a movie on the windshield, but it's another thing entirely to make good on that promise. With a few exceptions, 2016 has been stuck in the promising stage. It's a strange thing, really; automakers are famous for responding with "we don't discuss future product" whenever we ask about models or variants known to be in the pipeline, yet when it comes to self-driving electric wondermobiles, companies have been falling all over themselves to let us know that theirs is coming soon, it'll be oh so great, and, hey, that makes them a mobility company now, not just an automaker. A lot of this is posturing and marketing, showing the public, shareholders, and the rest of the industry that "we're making one, too, we swear!" It has set off a domino effect – once a few companies make the guarantee, the rest feel forced to throw out a grandiose yet vague plan for an unknown future. And indeed there are usually scant details to go along with such announcements – an imprecise mileage estimate here, or a far-off, percentage-based goal there. Instead of useful discussion of future product, we get demonstrations of test mules, announcements of big R&D budgets and new test centers they'll fund, those futuristic concept cars, and, yeah, more promises.