Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Ford Mustang Base on 2040-cars

US $2,000.00
Year:1966 Mileage:34500 Color: Silver
Location:

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Advertising:

1966 Mustang Convertible Base 289 2-bbl, 4 speed TransmissionCar runs and drives very wellCar has all new interior installed in February this year. New convertible top installed in February this year.Parts new or replaced include the following:New TiresSill PlatesNew Heater PlenumNew CarpetDoor PanelsUpholstryHeater Blower MotorQuarter Panel Ornament, running horseRadio SpeakerBattery Tray W/Hold downFuel PumpDistributorAlternatorRadiatorPlug's Points CondenserPlug wiresRebuilt CarburetorThe body has dings and dents that need some TLC and paint.

Auto Services in Tennessee

Watson Auto Sales East Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 3328 N Main St, Crossville
Phone: (931) 787-1779

Stephen`s Tire & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 1730 Fairview Blvd, Bon-Aqua
Phone: (615) 799-2886

Southern Cross Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Roadside Service, Trailers-Repair & Service
Address: 159 East Bockman Way, Doyle
Phone: (866) 421-8784

Seymour Muffler & Brake ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 12227 Chapman Hwy, Seymour
Phone: (865) 573-0400

S And J Complete Auto Services ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 624 Murfreesboro Pike, Bellevue
Phone: (615) 331-1021

Rods Tire and Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 47 Perimeter Pl, Medina
Phone: (731) 783-3664

Auto blog

Ford C-Max, Fusion hybrids subject of MPG lawsuit in California

Fri, 01 Mar 2013

A California lawsuit over the fuel economy claims for the 2013 Ford C-Max was first reported back in December. Based on the numerous reports we've heard of disgruntled owners failing to get their car's EPA fuel economy ratings on the C-Max and 2013 Fusion Hybrid, we suspected there would be more to this story. The Detroit News is reporting that two California law firms are combining their lawsuits against Ford on this matter for "false and misleading" claims.
The article states that there are hundreds of C-Max and Fusion Hybrid owners who have joined the lawsuit, but the issue isn't limited to customers. In December, Consumer Reports extensively tested both the Fusion Hybrid and C-Max and found that both hybrids performed significantly worse than their EPA claims. This all comes just a few months after Hyundai and Kia took the unprecedented step of lowering the fuel economy ratings for all of their 2012 and 2013 model-year vehicles.

Feds looking into Ford Explorer exhaust leak complaints

Fri, 20 Jun 2014

There may be a burgeoning problem with exhaust leaks in the 2011-2014 model year Ford Explorer. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is examining multiple complaints of a gasoline smell in the cabin of these SUVs. However, the exact cause of this problem is still unknown.
"The agency is reviewing all available data and will take appropriate action as warranted," said a NHTSA spokesperson in an email to Automotive News. Owners seem to generally complain on the regulator's website of the smell entering the cabin through the air vents. At this time, the government organization has not yet opened an official investigation into the problem, though. When it does begin inspecting vehicles, NHTSA posts a detailed breakdown of its public data online.
Similar problems have been reported about the Explorer in the past, though. In 2013, Ford issued a recall for the 2013 model year of the SUV due to a fuel leak that could cause drivers to smell a gasoline odor and repaired them again later for another possible leak. In response to Autoblog's questions, Ford responded via email: "We are not aware of a NHTSA investigation. We are currently reviewing the case and in the event that any action is required, we will address it promptly."

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.