2014 Ford Mustang Gt Premium on 2040-cars
US 119 Corridor G, Chapmanville, West Virginia, United States
Engine:Premium Unleaded V-8 5.0 L/302
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic w/OD
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1ZVBP8CFXE5287602
Stock Num: 4F0639
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang GT Premium
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Ingot Silver Metallic
Interior Color: Leather Seats Dark Charcoal
Options: Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 3
From the impressivepower and efficiency of ourV6 models to the legendary strengthof our V8s, each one of our ponies has beenbred to lead. For 2014, there are all sorts ofdramatic new features --- each of themdesigned to excite and delight the Mustang enthusiast in all of us!Mustang keeps the attitude coming with an impressive lineup of engines. There's the Shelby(R) GT500(R) with the most powerful production V8 engine in the world* -- a 662-hp** supercharged 5.8L capable of more than 200 miles per hour on the track. Discover a 305 horsepower, 31 highway mpg* V6 and the 5.0L V8 that pumps out a potent 420 horsepower** and 390 lb.-ft.of torque. And all engines are mated to six-speed transmissions. Visit Thornhill Ford Lincoln for a test drive today! Located along US 119 in Chapmanville, WV. Go In Style......Go Thornhill !!!!! Go In Style...Go THORNHILL
Ford Mustang for Sale
2014 ford mustang v6(US $24,530.00)
2014 ford mustang gt(US $49,380.00)
2009 ford mustang v6 premium(US $13,500.00)
2014 ford mustang v6(US $23,800.00)
1996 ford mustang base(US $3,195.00)
2014 ford mustang v6(US $25,987.00)
Auto Services in West Virginia
Total Auto Glass ★★★★★
Ray`s Automotive ★★★★★
NAPA Auto Parts ★★★★★
MotorCare Oil & Lubrication Center ★★★★★
Merritt & Sons ★★★★★
Hobbs Tire And Supply Inc. ★★★★★
Auto blog
Equus Bass 770 | Autoblog Minute
Wed, Feb 8 2017Equus Automotive combines a Ford Mustang and a Dodge Challenger into one. Dodge Ford Luxury Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video 5g Connectivity Detroit supercar transportation mobility challenger luxury vehicle
Ford decides C-Max shoppers not interested in fuel economy
Sat, Oct 25 2014If you say a car – the Ford C-Max Hybrid, for example – is "fun to drive," can anyone really come up with some empirical evidence against your claim? What about calling it "versatile"? We wonder if Ford has been thinking along these lines when it talks about the green little hatch. Ford is refocusing its sales strategy for the C-Max Hybrid after the model took a sales hit on both sides of the Atlantic recently, Automotive News reports. That sales dropoff may stem from the fact that Ford has had to revise its fuel-economy figures downward for the C-Max twice since last year, most recently in June. That made the company's once-proud fuel-economy comparisons with the Toyota Prius kind of pointless. Ford is going a different route, calling the model versatile (which, to be fair it was also doing a year ago), technologically advanced and fun to drive. Since the C-Max has about 50 more horsepower than the Prius, that last part may be true. Ford representatives didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from AutoblogGreen about the mpg-mention-free advertising direction, but we will update this post if we hear back. Sales of the C-Max Hybrid have suffered in the US. Through September, Ford sold 15,245 C-Max Hybrids, down 36 percent from last year. We shall see if a new focus away from the car's lowered mpg numbers helps. At least Ford can be pleased with sales of the C-Max Energi Plug-in Hybrid, which are up 51 percent compared to 2013.
Ford dinged by OSHA for asbestos at Buffalo plant
Sat, 20 Jul 2013Ford has come under fire from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for violations regarding asbestos exposure in a company metal stamping plant in Buffalo, NY. OSHA has cited Ford for eight violations in total, according to an Automotive News report, and faces fines of up to $41,800. 537 workers are employed at the stamping facility.
The violations include a pipefitter at the facility being exposed to asbestos-containing material while working on a steam line, other workers exposed to the material without respiratory protection and work areas that were not designed to limited the number of workers in contact with asbestos. Further, areas in which asbestos was present were not properly restricted, and levels of asbestos in the air were not monitored.
According to an unnamed Ford spokesperson in the AN report, the company feels that the OSHA citation is erroneous saying, "We have fully cooperated with the local OSHA officials and we don't believe the citations are warranted." Ford also maintains that it will work with the authorities to resolve the issue.