Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2000 Ford Mustang Gt on 2040-cars

Year:2000 Mileage:122657 Color: Red /
 Gray
Location:

7028 US Hwy 19, New Port Richey, Florida, United States

7028 US Hwy 19, New Port Richey, Florida, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:4.6L V8 16V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FAFP45X2YF178574
Stock Num: 3728
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang GT
Year: 2000
Exterior Color: Red
Interior Color: Gray
Options:
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Black grille
  • Cargo area light
  • Cassette player with auto-reverse
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Curb weight: 3,429 lbs.
  • Diameter of tires:
  • Door pockets: Driver and passenger
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Dual illuminated vanity mirrors
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front fog/driving lights
  • Front Head Room: 38.1"
  • Front Hip Room: 52.3"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.8"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 53.6"
  • Front sport seat
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 15.7 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 17 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 25 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Glass rear window
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Keyfob remote trunk release
  • Leather steering wheel trim
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Max cargo capacity: 8 cu.ft.
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • Overall height: 53.2"
  • Overall Length: 183.2"
  • Overall Width: 73.1"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Power convertible roof
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power steering
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear bench
  • Rear Head Room: 35.8"
  • Rear Hip Room: 41.0"
  • Rear Leg Room: 29.9"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 41.4"
  • Rear spoiler: Wing
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote power door locks
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Silver aluminum rims
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside under cargo
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Sport
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tires: Profile: 55
  • Tires: Speed Rating: H
  • Tires: Width: 225 mm
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
  • Wheel Diameter: 16
  • Wheel Width: 7.5
  • Wheelbase: 101.3"
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 122657

Contact Dean our General Sales Manager @ 877-244-8047 for any questions or concerns on this or any of our vehicles in our inventory !!

Auto Services in Florida

Zych Certified Auto Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 545 S Orange Blossom Trl, Orlo-Vista
Phone: (407) 886-6545

Xtreme Automotive Repairs Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 5904 Funston St, Hollywood
Phone: (954) 399-3867

World Auto Spot Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 2721 Forsyth Rd N, Lockhart
Phone: (321) 444-6540

Winter Haven Honda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 6395 Cypress Gardens Blvd, Jpv
Phone: (863) 508-2400

Wing Motors Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 125 W 27th St, Carl-Fisher
Phone: (305) 642-4455

Walton`s Auto Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2533 S McCall Rd, Rotonda-West
Phone: (941) 474-0686

Auto blog

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.

Ford Mustang GT350R adds a lot more than just a new letter [w/videos]

Mon, Jan 12 2015

Okay Chevrolet, the ball is in your court. Ford served up one hell of a rebuttal to the track-focused Camaro Z/28, introducing the limited-production Mustang GT350R, complete with over 500 horsepower, over 400 pound-feet of torque and freaking carbon-fiber wheels. Carbon-fiber wheels. Seriously. It's because of those 19-inch hoops, along with some other changes, that Ford was able to slice 130 pounds from the already lightweight GT350 Track Pack. The wheels are responsible for a 13-pound reduction in unsprung weight per corner, while the removal of such superfluous things like the air conditioning, stereo, rear seats, trunk carpet, backup camera and tire inflator accounts for the rest of the weight reduction. Along with the lower weight, Ford has thoroughly reworked the GT350's aerodynamics, adding a simply monstrous rear wing and diffuser, along with vented wheel wells, a new hood vent that both extracts heat and reduces lift. Beside the aero aids, Ford has shod the carbon-fiber wheels in ultra-grippy Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires, just to guarantee the shiny side remains up. View 21 Photos Ford retained the standard GT350's 5.2-liter, flat-pane V8, Torsen limited-slip differential (complete with a 3.73 rear axle ratio), although as power figures haven't been published for the standard car, there's no way to know whether the GT350R received a power bump. What we do know, though, is that the GT350R will not be limited to the track. While that's certainly its natural habitat, owners will be able to register and drive this monster on public roads. Take a look at the official press release on the GT350R, available below. And also be sure to have a peek at both Ford's stock photos of the new car, as well as our full gallery of live images, direct from the Blue Oval's Detroit Auto Show press conference home at Joe Louis Arena. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.

NHTSA advances investigation of Ford Crown Victoria headlights

Sat, Aug 15 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into reports of suddenly failing headlights on 517,945 examples of the 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis. The government started looking into this problem in April when the North Carolina Consumers Council filed a defect petition with the agency. Now, the inquiry has moved to the next step. According to NHTSA's documentation (as a PDF), it examined its own database and worked with Ford to come up with a total of 3,609 complaints of the front lighting control module suddenly failing. When this happens, drivers lose the low-beam headlights, but the high-beams can be used by holding the stalk. Sometimes turning the switch off and on fixes the issue. Additionally, there are 15 allegations of crashes, and one reported shoulder injury. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations "evaluate the scope, frequency, and consequence of the alleged defect" and don't necessarily lead to a recall. NHTSA looked into this problem once before in 2008 and 2009 and decided that a recall wasn't necessary. Ford also extended the warranty on the front lighting control module for these vehicles. INVESTIGATION Subject : Loss of headlights Date Investigation Opened: AUG 10, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15028 Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD CROWN VICTORIA 2003-2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 2003-2005 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: After receiving a defect petition (DP15002) concerning the loss of headlights and other exterior lighting in model year (MY) 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 605 reports (for all submission dates) alleging headlight failure. The complaints indicate failures of both low beam headlights typically while driving, a defect condition that was evaluated under a prior ODI investigation (PE08066). Most consumer VOQs indicate that the headlights failed suddenly and without warning leaving the driver with no forward lighting, however some report the headlights flickered or dimmed prior to turning off. In some cases drivers were able to turn the headlights back on after a period of time while others reported the headlights would not come back on at all.