Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1930 Ford Model A Coupe Hot Rod Street Rod Rat Rod Scta 1932 on 2040-cars

Year:1930 Mileage:99999 Color: Black /
 Gray
Location:

Canton, Ohio, United States

Canton, Ohio, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:Chevrolet 350
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 1930
Interior Color: Gray
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Model A
Trim: Coupe
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: Chevy Turbo 350
Mileage: 99,999
Exterior Color: Black
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

YOU ARE BIDDING ON A 1930 FORD COUPE. VERY SOLID ,NO PATCH PANELS EVER. FILLED ROOF, REVERSED FIRE WALL, 1932 GRILL .PAINTED TO HAVE A DISTRESSED LOOK. FLAT BLACK. 2 HINGES ON DOORS ,NOT 3 . TURNED UP FRAME HORNS, NOT DOWN. 49 FORD TAIL LIGHTS. SUPERBELL FRONT END. 4 LINK FRONT & REAR. 1972  350 ENGINE 350 TRANS. APX 350/375 HP.  PRO BUILT. 15"FRONT WHEELS 16" IN REAR, FORD CENTER CAPS.REAR TRIM RINGS IT SITS LOWER WITH THE FRONT FRAME KICKED UP 5" & THE REAR UP 8"SOLD AS IS {{ THIS FOR THAT }} NO BIKES

Auto Services in Ohio

West Chester Autobody Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 9366 Cincinnati Columbus Rd, Trenton
Phone: (513) 777-3857

West Chester Autobody ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 9366 Cincinnati Columbus Rd, Goshen
Phone: (513) 268-0219

USA Tire & Auto Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 1501 E Dorothy Ln, Springboro
Phone: (937) 310-5354

Trans-Master Transmissions ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 725 N Main St, Dayton
Phone: (937) 746-5620

Tom & Jerry Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1701 Kenny Rd, Amlin
Phone: (614) 488-8507

Tint Works, LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Customizing, Automobile Detailing
Address: 189 W Olentangy St Suite C, Richwood
Phone: (614) 649-5878

Auto blog

Jay Leno is far beyond driven in his 1971 Pantera

Mon, 23 Jun 2014

Perhaps it's fitting that the band Pantera is known for its heavy metal music, because the DeTomaso Pantera is the automotive equivalent of a metal album. It's short, aggressive and makes a mean sound. It doesn't mess around either, with a Ford 351-cubic-inch (5.75-liter) V8 sending mountains of torque to the rear wheels. This week, Jay Leno takes us on a detailed tour of his '71 to show why it rocks.
There's a regular format to Jay Leno's Garage. It starts with Jay and maybe a guest taking a look at the car and talking about its history, and then they take it out on the open road. However, this video is practically a Pantera buyer's guide. Jay is adamant from the start that the last thing anyone should own is a stock example. To remedy this, he and his guest, the editor of the Pantera Club magazine, take viewers to school about some of the ways to turn them into even better performance machines.
No matter what you do to it, though, the Pantera requires that the driver adapt to it, not the other way around. For example, Jay isn't a big guy by most standards, but he has to cram himself into the cockpit with his shoes off and shirt partially unbuttoned just to go for a drive. Still, once out on the road, it all makes sense with that rumbling V8 and those Italian supercar looks. Scroll down to watch and learn a lot more about this uncompromising '70s performance car.

Ford recalling 2015 Mustang for fuel line leak, 20K Transit Connects for plastic panel

Fri, Dec 5 2014

Ford is recalling 738 examples of the 2015 2015 Mustang with the 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine – 712 in the US, 16 in Canada. A fuel pressure sensor might have been installed incorrectly on the affected cars, and that could result in a fuel leak. At the time of writing the company hasn't heard any reports of any incidents related to the issue, and parties with affected vehicles can take them to the dealer to have the fuel tube assembly replaced free of charge. The 2014 Transit Connect Cargo Van is also the subject of a safety recall, due to a possible problem with adhesive used on the exterior plastic panel on the sliding doors. There are 19,825 units covered by that recall, which dealers will also repair free of charge. You can find more information on both bulletins in the press releases below. Ford Issues Safety Recall for Certain 2015 Mustang Vehicles in North America for Fuel Pressure Sensor Issue Dec 4, 2014 | DEARBORN, Mich. - Ford is issuing a safety recall for approximately 730 2015 Ford Mustang vehicles in North America (actual 728) for a potential fuel line leak. A fuel pressure sensor, which is part of the fuel supply tube assembly, may have been installed incorrectly, potentially resulting in a pressurized fuel leak. A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire. Ford is not aware of any fires, accidents or injuries related to this condition. Affected vehicles include certain 2015 Ford Mustangs equipped with 2.3-liter engines built at Flat Rock Assembly Plant, Sept. 25, 2014 to Oct. 9, 2014. Ford is aware of 712 vehicles in the United States and federalized territories and 16 in Canada. These totals are as of Dec. 3, 2014. Dealers will replace the fuel supply tube assembly at no cost to the customer. *** Ford Issues Safety Recall for Certain 2014 Transit Connect Cargo Van Vehicles in North America for Issue with the Plastic Panel on the Sliding Doors Dec 4, 2014 | DEARBORN, Mich. - Ford is issuing a safety recall for approximately 20,000 2014 Transit Connect cargo van vehicles in North America (actual 19,825) for an issue with adhesion of an exterior plastic panel to the sliding doors. This issue may result in noise, a water leak, a loose panel, or separation of the plastic panel from the vehicle while driving, potentially increasing the risk of an accident or injury. Ford is not aware of any accidents or injuries related to this condition.

Ford fights back against patent trolls

Fri, Feb 13 2015

Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.