Advertising:
2012 Ford Fusion Se on 2040-cars
US $17,985.00
Year:2012
Mileage:14473
Color:
Location:
2651 West Main, Greenfield, Indiana, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:2.5L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:2.5L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic
Condition: Certified Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3FAHP0HA0CR353859
Stock Num: 13594A
Make: Ford
Model: Fusion SE
Year: 2012
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Charcoal Black
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 14473
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3FAHP0HA0CR353859
Stock Num: 13594A
Make: Ford
Model: Fusion SE
Year: 2012
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Charcoal Black
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 14473
Relax, it's Covered. It's Ford Certified. After passing a rigorous 172 point inspection is a pre-owned vehicle Ford certified, complete with limited warranty coverage and 24-hour roadside assistance. 5 key points to CPO *7-year/100,000-mile Ford powertrain coverage *12-month/12,000-mile Ford limited warranty coverage* 172-point inspection by factory-trained technicians * Carfax Vehicle history report*24/ 7 Roadside Assistance Please visit www.dealerrater.com/inskeepford to see what folks are saying about us at INSKEEP FORD.... This 2012 Ford Fusion SE is offered exclusively by Inskeep Ford This Ford includes: 2.5L 16V I4 DURATEC ENGINE (STD) 4 Cylinder Engine Gasoline Fuel TUXEDO BLACK 202A EQUIPMENT GROUP ORDER CODE Steering Wheel Audio Controls Auto-Dimming Rearview Mirror Sun/Moon Roof Sun/Moonroof MP3 Player Bluetooth Connection Telematics Auxiliary Audio Input Navigation from Telematics REVERSE SENSING SYSTEM Rear Parking Aid CHARCOAL BLACK, CLOTH SEAT TRIM Cloth Seats 6-SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION (STD) A/T 6-Speed A/T *Note - For third party subscriptions or services, please contact the dealer for more information.* Rest assured with your purchase of this pre-owned Fusion SE. Because a CARFAX BuyBack Guarantee is included, you have built-in peace of mind to drive off the lot confidently. The CARFAX report for this 2012 Fusion SE highlights that it's a One-Owner vehicle, and for good reason. A One-Owner vehicle gives you the feel of owning a new vehicle without paying the new car price. This Certified 2012 Ford Fusion SE is a brilliant example of quality meets reliability. This vehicle has been thoroughly inspected and has an assured quality that you won't find with other vehicles. Low, low mileage coupled with an exacting maintenance program make this vehicle a rare find. More information about the 2012 Ford Fusion: Ford's Fusion offers a lot of bang for the buck in a mid-size car, and with a wide variety of engine options, available all-w Inskeep Ford is a three time Presidents Award Winning Dealership. We also have an Award winning service department with Ford Certified Technicians. We carry a large line of Pre-Owned vehicles. All payments listed are with approved credit, some restrictions apply. Need more information? Please call 888-238-0940 or visit our web site www.inskeepford.com
Ford Fusion for Sale
2012 ford fusion sel(US $18,985.00)
2014 ford fusion s(US $19,077.00)
2014 ford fusion s(US $19,077.00)
2013 ford fusion se(US $21,985.00)
2014 ford fusion se(US $24,007.00)
2014 ford fusion se(US $24,067.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
World Wide Automotive Service ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 2661 W Schmaltz Blvd, Unionville
Phone: (812) 339-9261
World Hyundai of Matteson ★★★★★
New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 5337 Miller Circle Dr, Dyer
Phone: (708) 983-6500
William`s Service Center ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Towing
Address: Bowling-Green
Phone: (812) 533-2866
Twin City Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 600 Farabee Dr, Montmorenci
Phone: (765) 447-2999
Trevino`s Auto Sales ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 500 W 150th St, East-Chicago
Phone: (219) 397-1138
Tom Cherry Muffler ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 1203 N College Ave, Gosport
Phone: (812) 323-1456
Auto blog
Consumer Reports: Ford Fusion fun but flawed; Mitsubishi i-MiEV slow, chintzy [w/videos]
Wed, 23 Jan 2013Waiting for a Ford compliment from Consumer Reports these days is like waiting for a low-cost new product from Apple. So we weren't really expecting a glowing review of the 2013 Ford Fusion when CR got its hands on the car. The institute's crew bought three different versions of the Fusion (Hybrid, 1.6-liter EcoBoost and a Titanium with the 2.0-liter EcoBoost) to put through its barrage of tests, and while we aren't too surprised by some of the findings, they're still interesting nonetheless.
CR praises the Fusion for its "eye-catching" design and says that the sportier Titanium trim level is the best-handling midsize sedan they've ever tested, but that's about where the good news ends for Ford. The Fusion Hybrid also posted the best-ever fuel economy CR has recorded in a midsize sedan, but the only problem is that their number was 39 miles per gallon combined - far less than Ford's 47 mpg rating for city, highway and combined. As expected, CR also dinged the Fusion for its MyFord Touch, but some of the other gripes about the car include a cramped cabin and poor fit and finish.
Other Ford products tested this time around include the Focus Electric and C-Max Hybrid. Like the Fusion, CR's observed fuel economy of 37 mpg for the C-Max fell well short of Ford's advertised 47-mpg rating, and both cars were criticized for the use of MyFord Touch. CR notes that the Focus Electric's interior is also cramped, with the battery pack taking up a lot of cargo space.
Shelby GT500 and Roush Stage 3 go head to head at the drag strip
Wed, 07 Aug 2013The Ford Mustang is a brilliantly affordable source of horsepower, with a base 300-plus-horsepower version available for well under $30,000. Jumping up to about $35,000 will get you a solid 420 horsepower from a high-revving V8, while those with some extra disposable income can get a pair of 600-plus-horsepower monsters. Both the Roush Stage 3 with its Phase 3 package and Ford's factory Shelby GT500 even crest the 650-horsepower mark, with 675 and 662 ponies, respectively.
Naturally, someone needed to find out which of these hi-po Mustangs was the quickest. And while this video is quite obviously a dealership commercial, at least there's some solid drag racing between two of the most powerful performance machines available for under $100,000.
With two NHRA drag racers at the wheel, the Stage 3 and GT500 go head to head for three races. Scroll down below to see the results in the full video.
Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age
Thu, 17 Jul 2014In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.